Notices
ECU Flash

Datalog Lab Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #31  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
A Few more things that I need to update since I first posted in this thread:

1. The frontal area is actually 27.64. The one that I was using before was wrong.
2. To get the most accurate power graph from the log select garph contents until one data point after peak rpm. So if your peak rpm is 7688 and the next rpm point is 7500, then select 7500 rpm as the end point. You can do that by reducing the numbers in the "To" box.
3. Set your smoothing to 7 or 8 inorder to get the best looking chart.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 12:22 AM
  #32  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
what do you suggest for the weight since I have the SSL package? I know the sunroof and system upgrades must throw off the original 3263 figure
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #33  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Inprogress
what do you suggest for the weight since I have the SSL package? I know the sunroof and system upgrades must throw off the original 3263 figure
The Evo 9 with SSL has a curb weight of 3338 lbs. Curb weight includes a full gas tank and all the fluids.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #34  
Inprogress's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Sounds great, thanks!

I've also attached my dyno via DLL in case anyone's interested, pretty solid numbers if you ask me. I don't have anything to compare it to, but will hang on to it from now on to compare when I do upgrades in the future. Oh and the weight is factored as 245 for me + laptop, subs in the trunk, backpack, tools; just for clarification
Attached Thumbnails Datalog Lab Dyno-dlldynonov1st.jpg  

Last edited by Inprogress; Nov 2, 2007 at 11:41 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:02 AM
  #35  
Thoe99's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
Originally Posted by nj1266
A Few more things that I need to update since I first posted in this thread:

1. The frontal area is actually 27.64. The one that I was using before was wrong.
2. To get the most accurate power graph from the log select garph contents until one data point after peak rpm. So if your peak rpm is 7688 and the next rpm point is 7500, then select 7500 rpm as the end point. You can do that by reducing the numbers in the "To" box.
3. Set your smoothing to 7 or 8 inorder to get the best looking chart.
Where did you find the frontal area? Most sources I've seen published says 24.92. This is the first time I've seen 27.64.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #36  
Terry S's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Tustin, CA
Nevermind. Its up.

Terry S
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Noize
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner
29
Sep 27, 2016 05:18 PM
Chris@AMS
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
117
Sep 8, 2010 10:43 AM
TrinaBabe
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
88
Oct 31, 2007 03:04 PM
brodienuchies
Evo General
17
Aug 20, 2007 09:54 AM
xtnct
Evo General
3
Apr 29, 2003 07:54 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 AM.