Silly idea to log boost in EvoScan??
I used to work with Honda ECUs (Assembling/Disassembling Code) and it may be in different locations.
Try to use a Hex Editor to look for those values (in Hex) inside of your ECU *.hex / *.BIN file. I bet that you will find that sequence and find the offset in the EDM file.
Send me the binary and I will try to look for the string in there. Can anyone confirm if the EDM model has a JDM Map Sensor or USDM? Then, I will know what string to look.
email: joed.rodriguez@gmail.com
Try to use a Hex Editor to look for those values (in Hex) inside of your ECU *.hex / *.BIN file. I bet that you will find that sequence and find the offset in the EDM file.
Send me the binary and I will try to look for the string in there. Can anyone confirm if the EDM model has a JDM Map Sensor or USDM? Then, I will know what string to look.
email: joed.rodriguez@gmail.com
Yes the units are completly different.
I get:
1920 246
65535 246
27064 248
65535 249
27186 251
8 253
25 0
32 2
40 3
fault unit is 4
It is the USDM.
I get:
1920 246
65535 246
27064 248
65535 249
27186 251
8 253
25 0
32 2
40 3
fault unit is 4
I used to work with Honda ECUs (Assembling/Disassembling Code) and it may be in different locations.
Try to use a Hex Editor to look for those values (in Hex) inside of your ECU *.hex / *.BIN file. I bet that you will find that sequence and find the offset in the EDM file.
Send me the binary and I will try to look for the string in there. Can anyone confirm if the EDM model has a JDM Map Sensor or USDM? Then, I will know what string to look.
email: joed.rodriguez@gmail.com
Try to use a Hex Editor to look for those values (in Hex) inside of your ECU *.hex / *.BIN file. I bet that you will find that sequence and find the offset in the EDM file.
Send me the binary and I will try to look for the string in there. Can anyone confirm if the EDM model has a JDM Map Sensor or USDM? Then, I will know what string to look.
email: joed.rodriguez@gmail.com
Last edited by DanielAustria; Mar 15, 2007 at 11:32 AM.
Shouldn't 0 volts be -14.7 psi instead of -14.5? Also could you share with us the other data points on the chart you posted? You have 10 dat points on the chart but it is not clear what is the voltage and the psi.
Last edited by nj1266; May 10, 2007 at 01:03 AM.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Which chart do you mean?
A perfect vacuum at sea level would be -14.7 psi. I suppose that would have been the better value to use. The 0.2 psi doesn't matter in the correlation though. It falls well within the estimation error. Without attaching the sensor to a vacuum chamber, I couldn't say within +/- 0.5 psi what pressure actually corresponds to 0 volts.
Which chart do you mean?
Which chart do you mean?
Last edited by nj1266; May 11, 2007 at 05:29 PM.
One more question mrfred:
Where did you come up with the number 1.4546 in the JDM formula of V=0.1028p+1.4546? Is that the voltage that you measured @ the altitude that you are at?
The formula comes from the chart that you posted here
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...3&postcount=23
Where did you come up with the number 1.4546 in the JDM formula of V=0.1028p+1.4546? Is that the voltage that you measured @ the altitude that you are at?
The formula comes from the chart that you posted here
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...3&postcount=23
Last edited by nj1266; May 11, 2007 at 05:36 PM.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
One more question mrfred:
Where did you come up with the number 1.4546 in the JDM formula of V=0.1028p+1.4546? Is that the voltage that you measured @ the altitude that you are at?
The formula comes from the chart that you posted here
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...3&postcount=23
Where did you come up with the number 1.4546 in the JDM formula of V=0.1028p+1.4546? Is that the voltage that you measured @ the altitude that you are at?
The formula comes from the chart that you posted here
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...3&postcount=23
P [psig] = 9.73V - 14.14
The correlation based on the 1.334*x used by the ECU would give a P vs V correlation of
P [psig] = 9.87V - 14.7
Take your pick. The correlations are within 0.2 psi of each other at boost values from 18 to 28 psi.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_altitude
Multiply kPa*0.1451 to get psi. Most people are not at sea level, so a more representative offset might be something closer to 14.3 to 14.5 psi. You are in Long Beach, so you could actually use 14.7. :-)
V=0.1028p+1.6
Am I correct? Or am I worng?
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I wouldn't expect atmospheric pressure on an Evo 8 MAP sensor to read the same voltage as the JDM MAP sensor. My location is just 300 ft above sea level. My correlations should be perfect for you.
PSI----Volt
-14.7---0
-8.9----0.593
-4.4----1.056
0-------1.508
20.1---3.574
32.7---4.870
I will log with my LM-1/LMA-2 soon and se how the numbers compare to the log from the OBD2 port. I suspect that the LM-1/LMA-2 will give me more data points than the OBD2 port. This is based on my experience when I logged the RPM from the OBD2 and the LMA-2. The OBD2 data was slower than the LMA-2 data.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I think I was correct in my assumption about your numbers being altitude based. Today I measured the voltage from the JDM MAP sensor @ the ECU pinout (it is the solid yellow wire on the right most ECU plug when you are looking stright @ the ECU from the passanger side). The voltage was 1.508 @ sea level. So the voltage-to-psi conversion to use if you are logging the JDM MAP with an LM-1/LMA-2/SSI-4 and you are @ sea level should be:
PSI----Volt
-14.7---0
-8.9----0.593
-4.4----1.056
0-------1.508
20.1---3.574
32.7---4.870
I will log with my LM-1/LMA-2 soon and se how the numbers compare to the log from the OBD2 port. I suspect that the LM-1/LMA-2 will give me more data points than the OBD2 port. This is based on my experience when I logged the RPM from the OBD2 and the LMA-2. The OBD2 data was slower than the LMA-2 data.
PSI----Volt
-14.7---0
-8.9----0.593
-4.4----1.056
0-------1.508
20.1---3.574
32.7---4.870
I will log with my LM-1/LMA-2 soon and se how the numbers compare to the log from the OBD2 port. I suspect that the LM-1/LMA-2 will give me more data points than the OBD2 port. This is based on my experience when I logged the RPM from the OBD2 and the LMA-2. The OBD2 data was slower than the LMA-2 data.
V = 0.1028*P - 1.4546
If you are measuring 1.508 volts with the ign on and the motor not running, then use:
V = 0.1028*P - 1.508
I assumed that 0 psi = 1.508 volts and plugged 1.508 into your equation to get the results. With that -14.7 psi was equal to 0.00316 volts. I followed the same method for all the other psi values.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evoscan
ECU Flash
1338
Aug 16, 2020 04:22 AM
Ian0611
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
13
Apr 3, 2013 01:21 PM





