Notices
ECU Flash

Is this timing map good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #1  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Is this timing map good?

I created this timing map based on the xede timing that I log. I changed the main cells and those that are adjacent to them. Does it look any good?

The car has a TBE, the AFR is in the low 11:1, a fuel pump and a JDM DV.
Attached Thumbnails Is this timing map good?-timing.gif  
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 08:57 PM
  #2  
4WS Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 1
From: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
free bump so he doesnt blow his shiit up lol
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #3  
sekula's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
agree with 4 wheel slide bump
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 09:14 PM
  #4  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Don't worry guys, I am not going to flash my car until after I make certain I know what I am doing. Hence the post. Tuning with the xede is much easier than flashing
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
coolguycooz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: California
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 10:55 PM
  #6  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by coolguycooz
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 12:53 AM
  #7  
mchuang's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 1
From: h town
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
Exactly..the timing map seems ok just need to try and smooth things out a bit, you have a few big jumps here and there.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:23 AM
  #8  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Can't see de map, motor oil in way,,, joke,
Image not avail

Nonetheless, amount of timing should be little different car to car, is this for an VIII?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #9  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
Just to add some more info. The boost is set to 22 psi peak and tapers to 19 by redline and the gas is 93-94 octane.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 06:16 AM
  #10  
nj1266's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by mchuang
Exactly..the timing map seems ok just need to try and smooth things out a bit, you have a few big jumps here and there.
Could you point thoe jumps to me on the map so I can fix them?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 08:19 AM
  #11  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
looks fine to me. I run a bit more timing then that, all over the place, with the same 93 octain and 24psi.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #12  
honki24's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
^totally ditto.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #13  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
That boost level and that fuel I have tuned cars to this map:



The car with this map now has cams (GSC 269's) but before that, it ran that midrange timing. All the same listed mods that you have with a 9.8 hotside. He ran 12.6's on pump with no problems and faster at higher boost and some 112.

Last edited by JohnBradley; Nov 17, 2006 at 11:48 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #14  
coolguycooz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: California
i have a quick question, how come you rescaled to 320 rather then 300, do you actually hit load higher then 300 with only 22 psi tapering down? If so is it because of the cams? If not dosent 7* at peak torque seem pretty high?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #15  
A418t81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, Al
Originally Posted by coolguycooz
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.
For 93 octane and 22 psi at peak tq, 5 deg is a good ways away from too much. Regardless, it really matters what his car thinks about the numbers and not what we eyeball on the board.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM.