Is this timing map good?
#6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Originally Posted by coolguycooz
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
That boost level and that fuel I have tuned cars to this map:
The car with this map now has cams (GSC 269's) but before that, it ran that midrange timing. All the same listed mods that you have with a 9.8 hotside. He ran 12.6's on pump with no problems and faster at higher boost and some 112.
The car with this map now has cams (GSC 269's) but before that, it ran that midrange timing. All the same listed mods that you have with a 9.8 hotside. He ran 12.6's on pump with no problems and faster at higher boost and some 112.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Nov 17, 2006 at 11:48 AM.
#14
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have a quick question, how come you rescaled to 320 rather then 300, do you actually hit load higher then 300 with only 22 psi tapering down? If so is it because of the cams? If not dosent 7* at peak torque seem pretty high?
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by coolguycooz
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.