Is this timing map good?
Is this timing map good?
I created this timing map based on the xede timing that I log. I changed the main cells and those that are adjacent to them. Does it look any good?
The car has a TBE, the AFR is in the low 11:1, a fuel pump and a JDM DV.
The car has a TBE, the AFR is in the low 11:1, a fuel pump and a JDM DV.
Originally Posted by coolguycooz
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
3* to -1* is too much at peak torque? The real determining factor is the amount of boost being used at peak torque and the rest of the powerband for that matter.
Originally Posted by mchuang
Exactly..the timing map seems ok just need to try and smooth things out a bit, you have a few big jumps here and there.
That boost level and that fuel I have tuned cars to this map:

The car with this map now has cams (GSC 269's) but before that, it ran that midrange timing. All the same listed mods that you have with a 9.8 hotside. He ran 12.6's on pump with no problems and faster at higher boost and some 112.

The car with this map now has cams (GSC 269's) but before that, it ran that midrange timing. All the same listed mods that you have with a 9.8 hotside. He ran 12.6's on pump with no problems and faster at higher boost and some 112.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Nov 17, 2006 at 11:48 AM.
i have a quick question, how come you rescaled to 320 rather then 300, do you actually hit load higher then 300 with only 22 psi tapering down? If so is it because of the cams? If not dosent 7* at peak torque seem pretty high?
Originally Posted by coolguycooz
seems a bit too advanced at peak torque. for 91 or 93 that might be a little too advanced. just try logging a pull.







