Evo IX 2-byte Load & Lean Spool for Dummies
I've just added the 2 byte load tables
I'm not certain about the lean spool disable...does it achieve the same results as what this thread discribes:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=259571
It seems like it does except that the boost enhancement tables are already shown in my rom. Any help is appreciated.
I'm not certain about the lean spool disable...does it achieve the same results as what this thread discribes:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=259571
It seems like it does except that the boost enhancement tables are already shown in my rom. Any help is appreciated.
Bump...I went ahead and added the "LeanSpoolEnable/Disable" tables as well. Again does this achieve the same thing as the changing the Boost Enhancement Start/Stop tables?
Thanks
Thanks
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
There's an error in the low bit address in the original post. It is INCORRECTLY written as:
<table name="2 byte load low bit" address="3EE6A" category="Misc" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint16" />
The CORRECT table address for the 88590015 ROM is:
<table name="2 byte load low bit" address="3EE8A" category="Misc" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint16" />
<table name="2 byte load low bit" address="3EE6A" category="Misc" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint16" />
The CORRECT table address for the 88590015 ROM is:
<table name="2 byte load low bit" address="3EE8A" category="Misc" type="1D" level="1" scaling="uint16" />
Since I has the incorrect address based on this tutorial, I want to make sure that I (and anyone else that used the incorrect address) sets the values back correctly.
The incorrect address I referenced for 2-byte load low bit was "3EE6A" and the original value I had in that location was "0". Is this correct? With a value of "0" I assume that the address isn't used at all, but I just want to be sure nothing breaks.
The incorrect address I referenced for 2-byte load low bit was "3EE6A" and the original value I had in that location was "0". Is this correct? With a value of "0" I assume that the address isn't used at all, but I just want to be sure nothing breaks.
I just checked again.
I have the original values as:
2-byte High - 3EE86 - 27169
2-byte low - 3EE8A - 27168
Incorrect 2-byte low - 3EE6A - 0
Can anyone verify?
I have the original values as:
2-byte High - 3EE86 - 27169
2-byte low - 3EE8A - 27168
Incorrect 2-byte low - 3EE6A - 0
Can anyone verify?
Last edited by TouringBubble; Apr 20, 2007 at 07:55 AM.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
That's correct for the 88590015 ROM. It may also be correct for the 88590013 and 14, but I don't have those xml files setup right now.







