Notices
ECU Flash

HOW TO - Control boost using ECUFLash and 3 port GM boost solenoid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #106  
dudical26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
I have not done a full RPM pull, I will go get a log.

I was just working on getting my new injectors dialed in and wanted to get a decent AFR before doing a high RPM pull.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #107  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by dudical26
I have not done a full RPM pull, I will go get a log.

I was just working on getting my new injectors dialed in and wanted to get a decent AFR before doing a high RPM pull.
Sounds good, looks like you are taking a good approach to tuning.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:04 PM
  #108  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
[sigh] razorlab that was not very confidence inspiring. I don't like having one of "those" cars. mrfred, yes it was "interesting" that I didn't get fuel cut. I might just have to try to induce it via short delay and low boost limit values. I don't like not having that as a decent safety against disconnected hoses and accidental tuning errors.

What is annoying about keeping the upper TBEC zeroed out is I lose the WGDC increase during 1st and 2nd gear. grrr I might as well put my MBC back on or take the time (less than I've spent so far) to install my ProfecB. [sigh] I'd be tuning for timing and AFR by now.

well anyway I'll keep trying. I set the upper half to +1 in each cell to see what would happen on my drive to and from the train ... damn if the morning, cool, seemed much better but this afternoon, warm, I hit 1.6 again without any sign of drop off. I wasn't logging so I don't know what WGDC was doing. Likely won't get to do that until the weekend again but we'll see.

oh yeah and I'm gonna see if I can force a negative correction by setting BDEL way low. I want to prove that my ecu will even do it cause so far even the little negative correction I've seen has stayed above BDEL and I want to see it drop BELOW my BWGDC settings.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #109  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
has anyone considered, and experimented with, the idea that the Boost Cut Delay Timer might relate as much to downward boost correction as it does to fuel cut?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #110  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Jumperalex
has anyone considered, and experimented with, the idea that the Boost Cut Delay Timer might relate as much to downward boost correction as it does to fuel cut?
My base tune from Vishnu had the delay time set to something like 130899490 ms, and at one point I was able to get nice up/down corrections in the WGDC. I still had the problem though of too much upward correction during spool-up. It would be nice to have a hard ceiling on the WGDC values.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #111  
dudical26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: NNJ
Here is a 3rd gear pull (up a hill)

Code:
RPM	TPS	Timing	WGDC	Load	AFR	MAP
2875	48.235	14	71	124.937	14.5	4.1
2937	54.902	11	68.5	138.793	13.7	6
3031	100	9	68	161.495	11.9	9.1
3156	100	7	67.5	186.446	11.2	12.6
3281	100	5	67.5	219.327	11.2	16.5
3500	100	4	68	249.29	11.2	20.1
3625	100	4	68.5	244.731	11.3	21.1
3812	100	5	69.5	239.081	11.5	21
4031	100	4	69.5	247.946	11.5	21
4218	100	5	69.5	243.513	11.4	20.9
4375	100	5	69.5	240.381	11.3	20.6
4500	100	5	69.5	240.277	11.4	20.7
4687	100	5	69.5	240.155	11.2	21.3
4843	100	4	69.5	240.381	11.3	21.6
5062	100	5	69.5	244.609	11.3	21.7
5218	100	5	69.5	244.731	11.3	21.5
5406	100	6	69.5	245.716	11.4	21.5
5531	100	7	69.5	245.716	11.3	21.6
5687	100	7	69.5	245.838	11.2	21.3
5906	100	8	69.5	241.362	11.2	20.9
6062	100	9	69.5	236.762	11.2	20.7
6218	100	9	69.5	238.081	11.2	20.3
6406	100	10	69.5	233.459	11.2	20.1
6562	100	10	69.5	231.246	11.1	19.8
6656	100	11	69.5	228.836	11	19.6
6781	66.667	27	69.5	177.255	11.4	12.5
Here is my WGDC
Attached Thumbnails HOW TO - Control boost using ECUFLash and 3 port GM boost solenoid-boost.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #112  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
sure .. go rain on my parade. I see how you are man. yeah a hard limit, or just a damn more responsive TBEC I wonder if any of the more accomplished ecu hackers are looking into that part of the code. all we really need is to find where the ECU determines if/when to make adjustments and, assuming there is a time factor, reduce it. even better if the up delay could be longer than the down delay. it would be a sweet hack and would make the ecu much more closed-loop like for boost control.

oh yeah and and and ... if they could figure out a way to tie it into the lean-spool code and use that "spool" condition as a way to increase the downward reaction time to catch the spike ... yeah yeah I know.

Hey mrfred didn't you say disabling lean spool really helped your spiking? what about hurting your spool though? I mean it IS there for a reason ...

just thinking outloud again ... if the spool upward correction is a problem, what about zero-ing out all upward values except say the -2 and -5 so that there is just enough upward correction to handle gear differences and actually prevent upward corrections when load is way below BDEL such as during spool?

I wonder, are the upward corrections additive? that is to say if you are in the -10 cell does it just add 6.5? or does it add 16.5?? that would make a difference in what I would set the -2 and -5 values.

and are we sure the "difference" is a % deviation or is straight difference? would just give me more detail on what to change those values on the left side to.

ok the wife wants Chik-Fil-A shakes and I can't deny her
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #113  
accident's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: NEbraska
here is my most recent settings. I'm hitting about 1.5 bar and taper down to 1.3 to redline. I zeroed out my upper TBEC table and lowered the bottom to -5.
I still need to raise my upper rpm MWGDC settings but I think I'm getting closer to my BDEL. So if I'm hitting my upper BDEL+BCLO target if I raise my upper TBEC table back up will I still stay within my target but hopefully pick up spool?
another question, I added the WGDC setting in my evoscan v0.99 it reads it on the screen but when I go to check the log after the run I can't get it to show?
ed
Attached Thumbnails HOW TO - Control boost using ECUFLash and 3 port GM boost solenoid-gmmap10.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #114  
accident's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: NEbraska
here is a screen from my 1st- 4th pull
Attached Thumbnails HOW TO - Control boost using ECUFLash and 3 port GM boost solenoid-log10.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 07:46 PM
  #115  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Jumperalex
I hit 1.6 again without any sign of drop off. I wasn't logging so I don't know what WGDC was doing.
Are you sure your BDEL + Offset aren't too high per each RPM?

What gear are you hitting 1.6?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #116  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Does anyone know what the impedance of the GM BCS is? Mitsu OEM BCS?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #117  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Jumperalex
sure .. go rain on my parade. ...

ok the wife wants Chik-Fil-A shakes and I can't deny her
Yeah, I was also thinking about the possibility of changing the ROM code to get better control over boost. However, I thought it be good to first figure out why some people aren't having boost overshoot and others are.

You should try disabling lean spool to see for yourself what its like. With it disabled, it doesn't quite have that "urgent" spool-up feeling, but it still spools plenty fast. And actually, I like the engine response better with it disabled. It has a more predictable response. Daily driving is easier as well as anticipating the boost response when going WOT at lower rpms.

To answer your other question, the boost correction is additive. After making one correction, if the load still is below the target value, then it can more correction. So if you have a max upward correction of "1", then the ECU will keep adding 1+1+1+1... until the load reaches its target value.

You could try just limiting the max upward correction to "2". This will keep the WGDC from increasing too much with spool up but still allow some long term upward drift perhaps to compensate for lower gears. Hard to say though because the lower gears are gone in an instant.

But definitely try disabling lean spool too.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #118  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by accident
...
another question, I added the WGDC setting in my evoscan v0.99 it reads it on the screen but when I go to check the log after the run I can't get it to show?
ed
If it reads on screen, then its somewhere in the log.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:46 AM
  #119  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
Originally Posted by razorlab
Are you sure your BDEL + Offset aren't too high per each RPM?

What gear are you hitting 1.6?
You can see what I have them set at in my earlier post, they don't seem too high. I'm hitting 1.6 mostly in 4th. I can soetimes see it in 3rd if I go WOT at 4000-4500 but it quickly settles. and if I start at <3000 you get the 1st curve in that post which was with positive TBEC zeroed out.

Mr. Evo IX: my GM tested out to 26ohm and my stock tested at 32.5ohm

Last edited by Jumperalex; Jul 10, 2007 at 02:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:48 AM
  #120  
Jumperalex's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 3
From: Alexandria VA
Originally Posted by mrfred
Yeah, I was also thinking about the possibility of changing the ROM code to get better control over boost. However, I thought it be good to first figure out why some people aren't having boost overshoot and others are.

You should try disabling lean spool to see for yourself what its like. With it disabled, it doesn't quite have that "urgent" spool-up feeling, but it still spools plenty fast. And actually, I like the engine response better with it disabled. It has a more predictable response. Daily driving is easier as well as anticipating the boost response when going WOT at lower rpms.

To answer your other question, the boost correction is additive. After making one correction, if the load still is below the target value, then it can more correction. So if you have a max upward correction of "1", then the ECU will keep adding 1+1+1+1... until the load reaches its target value.

You could try just limiting the max upward correction to "2". This will keep the WGDC from increasing too much with spool up but still allow some long term upward drift perhaps to compensate for lower gears. Hard to say though because the lower gears are gone in an instant.

But definitely try disabling lean spool too.
ok well that wil be the next thing I try, and then I think I'm gonna try some testing of TBEC to see what I get with only filling in the first two positive corrective values.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.