Let's see your fully tuned timing maps
#736
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
^ you need to install an upper clutch switch. It is on here somewhere. I have tried NLTS recently and WOW! I think my clutch squelled when I shifted. I am going to try it out at the track this sunday weather permiting to see what the change in time is. It is definetly something to get used to. I am going to change my tps setting to 90 for the moment until I get used to not lifting.
#739
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Is this OK?
This is my first time trying to smooth out my timing . The top pic is my current set up and the lower is my attempt at smoothing. What do you think? It seems to have too much advance. I don't want to find out the hard way, so any advice would be greatly appreciated.
#741
Evolved Member
Smoothing is going the right direction. Get it smoother and you'll be able to run more timing in certain areas. It takes a lot of patience to run a smooth and powerful map. The car will also drive so much better on a smoothed out map.
#742
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
I did several pulls and I was getting 1 or 2 counts of knock (3k-6k rpm 220 load, but nothing major, until the 4th pull. I got 9-7 counts at 5500 to redline, timing at 10 to 15 respectively.
This time I actually advanced it in the 220-240 load 2k-redline to smooth it out. Is this in the right direction? In the past I'd retard the timing, but then the map wouldn't be as smooth, unless I start retarding the timing in the lower loads too.
On a partially am I suppose to smooth out the fuel map too? Mine looks terrible!
#744
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
I did several pulls and I was getting 1 or 2 counts of knock (3k-6k rpm 220 load, but nothing major, until the 4th pull. I got 9-7 counts at 5500 to redline, timing at 10 to 15 respectively.
This time I actually advanced it in the 220-240 load 2k-redline to smooth it out. Is this in the right direction? In the past I'd retard the timing, but then the map wouldn't be as smooth, unless I start retarding the timing in the lower loads too.
On a partially am I suppose to smooth out the fuel map too? Mine looks terrible!
This time I actually advanced it in the 220-240 load 2k-redline to smooth it out. Is this in the right direction? In the past I'd retard the timing, but then the map wouldn't be as smooth, unless I start retarding the timing in the lower loads too.
On a partially am I suppose to smooth out the fuel map too? Mine looks terrible!
#745
Let me know what you think?
AMS 35r/ Built bottom end (2.0)/ Walbro double pumper/ 1000cc/TBE/ ~22 psi/ 91 pump
Sorry for the poor quality, lemme know if I need to just load the map itself. Thanks guys!
AMS 35r/ Built bottom end (2.0)/ Walbro double pumper/ 1000cc/TBE/ ~22 psi/ 91 pump
Sorry for the poor quality, lemme know if I need to just load the map itself. Thanks guys!
Last edited by rEVoLed; Dec 21, 2010 at 05:52 PM.
#748
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
si, i kept it blocky in the upper RPMs in case i wanted to play with the boost. it worked well when i was turning it up 2 psi at a time from 18 psi. it hit the correct timing everytime. i guess i just didnt see a need to change it.
that 7 block 100-160 load is trying to play around with the 2-step. i got rid of the knock that was going on there. only thing is, i cant get it to richen up there and the logs indicate im only hitting 5 degrees. any suggestions?
that 7 block 100-160 load is trying to play around with the 2-step. i got rid of the knock that was going on there. only thing is, i cant get it to richen up there and the logs indicate im only hitting 5 degrees. any suggestions?