88840016 vs 88840017???
Search Threads
Google Search
Threads
Posts
Advanced
Navbar Menu
Home
Forums
Marketplace
New Posts
Gallery
Login
Register
About
About Us
Advertising
Cookie Policy
Privacy Statement
Terms of Service
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Home
Lancer Evo 1-9 Forums
Evo Engine Management / Tuning Forums
/
ECU Flash
88840016 vs 88840017???
Subscribe
Search this Thread
Search
Feb 7, 2012 | 03:03 AM
#
16
dimacoupe
Newbie
dimacoupe
Newbie
close
Jul 30, 2014
Join Date
May 2010
Location
N/A
Posts:
54
iTrader Positive Feedback
100
iTrader Feedback Score
(
6
)
Likes:
0
Liked:
0
Times in
0
Posts
Profile
Posts
88586714 i think, correct if wrong
Reply
0
Feb 7, 2012 | 07:17 AM
#
17
donner
Evolving Member
donner
Evolving Member
close
Jun 25, 2023
Join Date
Aug 2009
Location
Europe
Posts:
199
iTrader Positive Feedback
100
iTrader Feedback Score
(
1
)
Likes:
0
Liked:
2
Times in
2
Posts
Profile
Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dimacoupe
88586714 i think, correct if wrong
You are correct.
Reply
0
Tags
8840013
,
88840016
,
88840016hex
,
88840017
,
address
,
evo
,
evolutionmn
,
grave
,
hex
,
idle
,
limit
,
newton
,
rev
,
rom
,
tephra
,
turns
Subscribe
Reply to Thread
Related Topics
arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow
PATCH: TephraMod V5
Rom 88840016
Load Logging
FS:BBS wheels with Falken Azenis RT-615 255/40/17 (pics)
Back to Subforum
ECU Flash
View Next Unread
Issues interfacing with car on Evoscan & ECU Flash
ECU Flash
Today's Posts
Go to:
ECU Flash
Today's Posts
Reply
Closed
2
/
2
1
2
More
