Notices
ECU Flash

max boost on stock internals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #61  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Yep - well thats the changes I have made, more WGDC sooner to let it spike to 23/24 and then hold it for a bit longer. + some timing changes
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 07:36 PM
  #62  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
yeah i am not happy unless i see SOME minimal knock.
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #63  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
lol :P
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #64  
jibbed's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
LOL! I'm guessing that friend is me...

And as far as the intake mod, see attached...

Originally Posted by Asmodeus6
If this is about the intake tube itself.
Get new friends...
Attached Thumbnails max boost on stock internals-intakecut2.jpg  
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #65  
Asmodeus6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Thats alot different.

*phew*

thank god!
Reply
Old May 29, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #66  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
what did you think I meant?
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 05:46 AM
  #67  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 7
From: Berkeley, CA
I think he thought you were referring to the snorkel between the airbox and the turbo.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #68  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by kanyonkid
i would think u would wanna do a 255 fuel pump... more boost=more fuel for safety
Stock IX pump has been shown to work fine up to 350 whp.
Reply
Old May 30, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #69  
logic's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 7
From: Berkeley, CA
I hate putting fuel system capacities in terms of whp, especially when we can put it in terms of things we can regularly and accurately measure.

The stock IX pump (per AMS' testing) flows 167lph at 70psi. Assuming you're running stock fuel pressure (43 psi) and 25psi of boost, you're asking the pump to operate at 68psi at full tilt. So, assuming good voltage to the pump , somewhere around 165lph is being supplied at that point, or to put it in terms of injector sizing, a maximum of 690cc/min per injector.

That's enough to support around 52lbs/min of air at 12:1, or 48lbs/min at 11:1 (assuming your injectors can keep up), and there's room to improve here if you have the luxury of setting a lower fuel pressure with larger injectors. An Evo IX turbo, if I'm reading the interwebs right, can operate in the neighborhood of 42lbs/min. So, the headroom on the stock IX pump looks pretty good to me.

(Going off-topic: I should point out for the archives that the IX pump is unique here; the VIII pump has a high-pressure bypass that causes it to crap out between 65-67psi. It means, quite literally, don't run more than 22psi of boost on a VIII turbo without doing something about the pump. I assume everyone in this thread already knows that, but just in case someone comes across this thread later, it'd be good to note it here.)

(Going a little further off-topic: notice that maximum flow on the pump is in the 690cc/min/injector range. That makes the stock injectors (560s) very weak for this turbo when considering it's potential; with stock injectors, you'd be limited to supporting around 42lbs/min at 12:1, or around 39lbs/min at 11:1. Since these are all maximums, you're pushing it with the stock injectors if you start winding it up. Mathematically, 720s would seem to make a very good match for the stock pump, since you'd only be running them around 80% IDC when the pump was at full tilt. Toss in 950s or 1000s for E-85 and be happy. I'm surprised that Mitsubishi did so well on sizing the pump to the turbo, but so poorly on sizing the injectors.)

(Yet more off-topic: if you're running more than 25psi or so on the stock turbo, regardless of how good or bad an idea that might be, you're starting to push it on the stock IX pump. Again, assuming you're running stock fuel pressure; mildly under-pressurizing larger injectors can always get a bit more flow out of the pump, but atomization at the head will suffer.)
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 12:48 AM
  #70  
Asmodeus6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by logic
I hate putting fuel system capacities in terms of whp, especially when we can put it in terms of things we can regularly and accurately measure.

The stock IX pump (per AMS' testing) flows 167lph at 70psi. Assuming you're running stock fuel pressure (43 psi) and 25psi of boost, you're asking the pump to operate at 68psi at full tilt. So, assuming good voltage to the pump , somewhere around 165lph is being supplied at that point, or to put it in terms of injector sizing, a maximum of 690cc/min per injector.

That's enough to support around 52lbs/min of air at 12:1, or 48lbs/min at 11:1 (assuming your injectors can keep up), and there's room to improve here if you have the luxury of setting a lower fuel pressure with larger injectors. An Evo IX turbo, if I'm reading the interwebs right, can operate in the neighborhood of 42lbs/min. So, the headroom on the stock IX pump looks pretty good to me.

(Going off-topic: I should point out for the archives that the IX pump is unique here; the VIII pump has a high-pressure bypass that causes it to crap out between 65-67psi. It means, quite literally, don't run more than 22psi of boost on a VIII turbo without doing something about the pump. I assume everyone in this thread already knows that, but just in case someone comes across this thread later, it'd be good to note it here.)

(Going a little further off-topic: notice that maximum flow on the pump is in the 690cc/min/injector range. That makes the stock injectors (560s) very weak for this turbo when considering it's potential; with stock injectors, you'd be limited to supporting around 42lbs/min at 12:1, or around 39lbs/min at 11:1. Since these are all maximums, you're pushing it with the stock injectors if you start winding it up. Mathematically, 720s would seem to make a very good match for the stock pump, since you'd only be running them around 80% IDC when the pump was at full tilt. Toss in 950s or 1000s for E-85 and be happy. I'm surprised that Mitsubishi did so well on sizing the pump to the turbo, but so poorly on sizing the injectors.)

(Yet more off-topic: if you're running more than 25psi or so on the stock turbo, regardless of how good or bad an idea that might be, you're starting to push it on the stock IX pump. Again, assuming you're running stock fuel pressure; mildly under-pressurizing larger injectors can always get a bit more flow out of the pump, but atomization at the head will suffer.)
Really nice post.

And yes. I thought he was talking about whacking a hole in the intake tube.
I almost cried.

All good now tho.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 05:40 AM
  #71  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
The bad thing about the bypass valves in the pumps is that they just slam open. So everything is fine and then BAM no fuel pressure. Then it takes the wideband a quarter second to respond to the problem, but usually the motor has already started misfiring. Theirfore you can't always datalog the problem because you have sensor lags.

At any rate an 8 should have a pump as a first mod IMO. The 9 can usually keep the stock pump until you upgrade injectors.
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 05:55 AM
  #72  
injentech42's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 1
From: New York
you better get headstuds
Reply
Old May 31, 2008 | 06:59 AM
  #73  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
why Injen?

Ash - sif im going to put a hole after the filter OR MAF :P hhahaa
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #74  
jibbed's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Who knows - you might be onto something!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 11:20 PM
  #75  
Viciouslord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 649
Likes: 1
From: DA BOTTOM B!*@#
my stock motor has just over 75,000 miles and im still pushing 33 psi. daily with 100% meth.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:22 AM.