It will not be $100. With EcuTeK at $750 which does not always include dynotime, it will be a more effective pricing model, faster results, no need to make an appointment and a flat XXX gain in power and tq. The unit will be PNP.

We are putting the X back on the dyno today to try and break the 100whp mark on the ZChip on the stock Evo X.

 

good luck guys...i better get to work on my evo else sum X's over here might actually start boogeying

 

alrighty then... lets keep this thread focused on ECUFLASH please... Other innovative products can go in their respective vendor forums and/or sections.

Stay on topic please....

 

and steve yes dumping 3k+ into suspension and wheels should make it nimbler, but do the same for an 8 or 9 and your back to square one, im saying stock for stock

 

last off topic post...

Chaz, I'll drive a stock X circles around a stock 8/9. Stock for Stock the X handles better. Research any track time. Other then straight aways, X's do better on the track. The 9 only had them on straights, but then again, I think I remember a test with an evo 6 beating up a 9 on straights too, so newer models losing on straight is nothing new. But as evolution of the evolution keeps goin, newer models handle better. And I'm into suspension and wheels/tires for around 5k sir,

 

any updates on this? I know the cable has been delayed until 7/31, but how about the programming?

 

What were you trying to type? 7/21? Or 7/31? But it should be out this month, right?

 

whoops, lol

fixed

 

its USDM EvoX Rom

http://forums.openecu.org/viewtopic.php?p=18669#18669

 

Awesome. Now the fun can really begin! This will really speed up the Evo X ECUFlash tuning curve.

 

Are there any xml's for the other rom yet ?

 

why not?

 

haha yes

<map name="l" type="1" active="1" help="" class="1" map_struct="" level="0">
<data count="21" offset="#FFFD2" storagetype="uint8" func_2val="[value]" func_val2="[value]" format="%.2f" metric="" caption="" desc="" inc="1" incb="5" incdata="0" incdatab="0" inc_dir="1" cols="1" view="char" color_dir="1"/>
</map>

 

Do you all think the freeware version of IDA4.9 or the trial version of 5.2 would do the job? Not really wanting to spend the money on 5.2 standard without seeing what I'm getting into.

 

looks like the offset for...

low ign
hi ign
fuel hi
fuel lo
fuel hi 1
fuel lo 1
injector latency
boost cut

are the same as the ones i posted for the EDM rom.

however the mivec, boost wg, boost target tables are all different as well as all the RPM scalings and load scalings.

ign load offset 60f76 elements 22
ign rpm offset 616f4 elements 23

fuel load offset 63cc6 elements 21
fuel rpm offset 63d1e elements 16

injector scaling offset 6512e elements 7
boost cut scaling offset 651ca elements 9

That's what i can find so far in 10 mins... More searching in a bit.