Evo 10 - Ecuflash - 3 tables
We've got the same disassembly base code, but I'm in a similar situation (baby instead of house). I probably won't do much with the X stuff until I get flex fuel working on the IX. Colby has the same disassembly base code, so hopefully he will take some time to seek out the main tables.
Same situation .. starting a new job, on job training .. and now staying at a place with 0 access to the net !!!!
Good news is I got a few subroutines defined .. the codes are much easier to decipher (or maybe I'm just getting better with the mitsubishi coding structures
)Bad news is some of the tables posted here are talking about wrong stuff ..
Worse news is I got no more time to do this as my new job starts to kick in ..
Damn, see Big Valley's Evo X run 11.2sec. on streetfire.net? I assume they slapped in a stand-alone on it? I'm anxious to see how many X's run below 11's at the DSM Shootout this year
Especially with a reflashed stock ECU
Especially with a reflashed stock ECU
Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Jun 19, 2008 at 07:31 PM.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Mrfred thanks I got the software now ..
Same situation .. starting a new job, on job training .. and now staying at a place with 0 access to the net !!!!
Good news is I got a few subroutines defined .. the codes are much easier to decipher (or maybe I'm just getting better with the mitsubishi coding structures
)
Bad news is some of the tables posted here are talking about wrong stuff ..
Worse news is I got no more time to do this as my new job starts to kick in ..
Same situation .. starting a new job, on job training .. and now staying at a place with 0 access to the net !!!!
Good news is I got a few subroutines defined .. the codes are much easier to decipher (or maybe I'm just getting better with the mitsubishi coding structures
)Bad news is some of the tables posted here are talking about wrong stuff ..
Worse news is I got no more time to do this as my new job starts to kick in ..

Once/if the cables are out and people can read and write them with Ecuflash it might spur people on a bit. I've had no time to look further at this, I'm not getting a X because it is too heavy for only a 2.0 engine, SST tunability is unknown. A minor point is that they haven't changed to direct injection with our fuel over $10 a gallon I'd want it to have some decent acceleration to start with and then be exciting afterwards. They've gone CO2 mad over here on taxes, some big AMG/Jag/Lexus/BMW/Audi stuff is getting very well priced, I'd probably keep the IX and get one of those or wait until 2009 when the GT-R comes here.
Last edited by jcsbanks; Jul 11, 2008 at 07:44 AM.
seriously if sumone had taken the time to redesign the cylinder head on the 4g63 i think you couldve made huge advancements, but yea X is heavy ...ive driven one and you can feel the difference, not quite as nimble, not to say if given a choice between the X and sumthing else i wouldnt take the X, theres a white GTR over by me now...thats what i want lol
Once/if the cables are out and people can read and write them with Ecuflash it might spur people on a bit. I've had no time to look further at this, I'm not getting a X because it is too heavy for only a 2.0 engine, SST tunability is unknown. A minor point is that they haven't changed to direct injection with our fuel over $10 a gallon I'd want it to have some decent acceleration to start with and then be exciting afterwards. They've gone CO2 mad over here on taxes, some big AMG/Jag/Lexus/BMW/Audi stuff is getting very well priced, I'd probably keep the IX and get one of those or wait until 2009 when the GT-R comes here.

dam TTP, you guys dont play lol...and i never said i thought the X was a bad car...i just think that do to its weight difference compared to an 8 or 9 it would require a substantial amount more HP to make up the difference in weight...would never say its a bad car tho...there turn-in and turn-out capabilitys alone make it an amazing vehicle
seriously if sumone had taken the time to redesign the cylinder head on the 4g63 i think you couldve made huge advancements, but yea X is heavy ...ive driven one and you can feel the difference, not quite as nimble, not to say if given a choice between the X and sumthing else i wouldnt take the X, theres a white GTR over by me now...thats what i want lol
Don't count your chickens this early on. The X mapping is flawed from the factory. We have the fix for it. With about 3psi and our ZChip in development, we have seen +85whp and +65tq with a huge improvement in driveability. 337.2whp. We WILL get 350whp before we are ready to make the final product.
We know its a little off from the ecuflash thread, but this is in response to the car being a slug from the factory. We will hit +100whp without a reflash on this STOCK EvoX complete with full monolith catalytic converter, and stock intake! Stay tuned to the other EvoX General thread.
We know its a little off from the ecuflash thread, but this is in response to the car being a slug from the factory. We will hit +100whp without a reflash on this STOCK EvoX complete with full monolith catalytic converter, and stock intake! Stay tuned to the other EvoX General thread.
IDK what the price is going to be yet but I thought I read somewhere in the realm of 100$ ? If thats true, then you've offered what seems to be an invaluable tuning tool for a super affordable price. I'm excited to see how it turns out.


