TephraMOD V5.10
Sep 9, 2008, 07:50 AM
#242
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this one
http://www.newark.com/jsp/search/pro...sp?SKU=63M1034
it is +/- 5%
I thoughts that what you had been using. Are you using something different?
Sep 9, 2008, 09:00 AM
#243
Now you tell me. I bought the ones that you posted a link to in the thread about removing your 02 sensor.
this one
http://www.newark.com/jsp/search/pro...sp?SKU=63M1034
it is +/- 5%
I thoughts that what you had been using. Are you using something different?
this one
http://www.newark.com/jsp/search/pro...sp?SKU=63M1034
it is +/- 5%
I thoughts that what you had been using. Are you using something different?
I'm actually using this right now (LINK), its 1% tolernace but I use it because it runs roughly 60*f cooler than the one you have now. The body of that thing is literally like a 1/2" long, super tiny.
Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Sep 9, 2008 at 09:10 AM.
Sep 9, 2008, 11:22 AM
#244
Tephra, there appears to be a small bug in 96260009. The ICS function does not remember if left for more than an hour. Someone else noticed this, and I tried it today.
Sep 9, 2008, 01:18 PM
#245
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I'm getting a P0037 CEL so it seems to not be working right now 
Do you think it might be an issue with v5.10 as other have had the same problem or should I just change to a new resistor?
Do you think it might be an issue with v5.10 as other have had the same problem or should I just change to a new resistor?
Oops, that was a typo in my part. A +/-5% tolerance on a 75 ohm resistor should work for you. Going to a 2 or 1% tolerance resistor is better of course, but that one should be working for you.
I'm actually using this right now (LINK), its 1% tolernace but I use it because it runs roughly 60*f cooler than the one you have now. The body of that thing is literally like a 1/2" long, super tiny.
I'm actually using this right now (LINK), its 1% tolernace but I use it because it runs roughly 60*f cooler than the one you have now. The body of that thing is literally like a 1/2" long, super tiny.
Sep 9, 2008, 01:32 PM
#246
I dunno what the issue might be. Maybe there is resistance in the wiring which, when combined with the resistor, are exceeding 80 ohms at the ECU? You can grab one of the resistors I posted in my last post and see if that helps? It was very cheap and is working for me with the v5.10 patch.
Sep 12, 2008, 10:59 AM
#250
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am having trouble when I try to log which set of maps the ECU is using with EvoScan. This is the entry in the EvoScan data settings. I have added 0x8425 to E3 on my MUT table. When I try to log I get the following results: ALT MAP Activation shows 255 no matter which maps I am on. I am ROM ID 9417015 and I am using the ICS to switch maps. I have confirmed that the maps do switch as I have different boost levels set on each.
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="ALT MAP Activation" LogReference="AltMapActive" RequestID="E3" Eval="x" Unit="unit" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="5" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="5" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="Alt Maps
0= Standard Maps 
3= Alt Maps" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Sep 12, 2008, 11:10 AM
#251
Try this perhaps:
Only because I'm certain this works. I already edited the requestID for you. You used "E" from the y asis and 3 from the x axis I assume.
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Alt Map Activation" LogReference="AltMapActivation" RequestID="E3" Eval="x" Unit="unit" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="20" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="20" ScalingFactor="10" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Sep 12, 2008, 06:12 PM
#252
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a big problem.
I went from 88590013 to 88590015 with the 5.10 version. The car starts and drive perfect......until I go 100% TPS, the car won't move forward at all, it feels like going on neutral.
I haven't tune the boost settings because I just installed the GM boost S, anyways, it feels like fuel cut. Can somebody help me out?
Thanks!
I went from 88590013 to 88590015 with the 5.10 version. The car starts and drive perfect......until I go 100% TPS, the car won't move forward at all, it feels like going on neutral.
I haven't tune the boost settings because I just installed the GM boost S, anyways, it feels like fuel cut. Can somebody help me out?
Thanks!
