TephraMOD V6 - testing!
I have a late 04 EDM VIII (has the 96530006 ROM as standard) and I don't see the problem you are highlighting above in the quick logs I have done. It appears to be working fine to be honest.
I know this doesn't help you, sorry, but it does indicate that it may not be a problem in all vehicles.
I know this doesn't help you, sorry, but it does indicate that it may not be a problem in all vehicles.
well the "min load ..." table controls when the WG is first acted upon.
but according to that table it should kick in about 86% load...
so I am not sure whats going on...
can you do a 3rd gear pull from like 1800rpm? i need to see the bottom end of the load + wgdc + rpm + tps
but according to that table it should kick in about 86% load...
so I am not sure whats going on...
can you do a 3rd gear pull from like 1800rpm? i need to see the bottom end of the load + wgdc + rpm + tps

If the WGDC kicks in at 1.9 psi where the wastegate crack pressure is 11-13psi, what is the problem?
I think I might have found the culprit.
It seems the BCS Re/Deactivation table is different between the 03 and 05 Evo's.
Here is the difference, 03 Evo value on top, 05 Evo value on bottom. I also notice that my WGDC goes to 100% right about 2250rpms and 120 load.

Bryan from GST noted it in this post here
Edit: the addresses for these 2 tables are also different. 2003 with 94170015 address in 1668, 2005 96530706 address is 1a68
It seems the BCS Re/Deactivation table is different between the 03 and 05 Evo's.
Here is the difference, 03 Evo value on top, 05 Evo value on bottom. I also notice that my WGDC goes to 100% right about 2250rpms and 120 load.

Bryan from GST noted it in this post here
Edit: the addresses for these 2 tables are also different. 2003 with 94170015 address in 1668, 2005 96530706 address is 1a68
Last edited by dude; Jun 7, 2009 at 08:17 AM.
"Of course they were *****, Donny; they were threatening castration! Are we gonna split hairs here? Am I wrong?" 
I don't think it should be a big issue, but I can see where you are coming from. The issue isn't serious, but we are making minor improvements so we might as well not make minor deficiencies
Good that you found the solution

I don't think it should be a big issue, but I can see where you are coming from. The issue isn't serious, but we are making minor improvements so we might as well not make minor deficiencies

Good that you found the solution
"Of course they were *****, Donny; they were threatening castration! Are we gonna split hairs here? Am I wrong?" 
I don't think it should be a big issue, but I can see where you are coming from. The issue isn't serious, but we are making minor improvements so we might as well not make minor deficiencies
Good that you found the solution


I don't think it should be a big issue, but I can see where you are coming from. The issue isn't serious, but we are making minor improvements so we might as well not make minor deficiencies

Good that you found the solution
But seriously, I wasn't able to see if changing the BCS Re/Deactivation address/values gave me 100% WGDC like it should. Damn business travel and hampering my tuning.
Is there anyone else here running v7 coming from a 9417 rom? Or am I the only guy on my island on this...
The dude abides.
But seriously, I wasn't able to see if changing the BCS Re/Deactivation address/values gave me 100% WGDC like it should. Damn business travel and hampering my tuning.
Is there anyone else here running v7 coming from a 9417 rom? Or am I the only guy on my island on this...
But seriously, I wasn't able to see if changing the BCS Re/Deactivation address/values gave me 100% WGDC like it should. Damn business travel and hampering my tuning.
Is there anyone else here running v7 coming from a 9417 rom? Or am I the only guy on my island on this...

Other's have said they have converted using my USDM distribution without any trouble as well. Some had minor hick-ups but mostly the problems of the user not transferring their data properly or deleting all the XML's so the data displays properly.
I am running it without any trouble, but then again I have a 03' VIII the bastard child of all EVO's! 
Other's have said they have converted using my USDM distribution without any trouble as well. Some had minor hick-ups but mostly the problems of the user not transferring their data properly or deleting all the XML's so the data displays properly.

Other's have said they have converted using my USDM distribution without any trouble as well. Some had minor hick-ups but mostly the problems of the user not transferring their data properly or deleting all the XML's so the data displays properly.
I am running it without any trouble, but then again I have a 03' VIII the bastard child of all EVO's! 
Other's have said they have converted using my USDM distribution without any trouble as well. Some had minor hick-ups but mostly the problems of the user not transferring their data properly or deleting all the XML's so the data displays properly.

Other's have said they have converted using my USDM distribution without any trouble as well. Some had minor hick-ups but mostly the problems of the user not transferring their data properly or deleting all the XML's so the data displays properly.
Keep in mind this rom "works" in my car and I wouldn't call it "trouble"...it starts, runs, builds boost, changes timing and afr etc. It just doesn't work exactly how I want it to in regards to handling WGDC the same way as the 9417 ROM.
If you guys can empirically state that you do not have the same issues, please email me your xml and rom image. christopher.byrne at gmail and I will install ecuflash in a new directory, replace the xml, load your map and change nothing other than the immob code and injector settings and see if I was the source of the error.
Are you using my modded version or Tephra's version and you are modding it yourself? If you are modding it yourself download my version and try that too, maybe there is something you are not copying over.
Make sure you copy in the appropriate XML that Tephra includes because you do have to delete any previous v6 or v7 XML that you might have in your ECUFlash directory.
I have 100% confirmed WGDC working perfectly as expected. If you look a few posts up I was having issues but it was my min load for WGDC map that was the culprit.
So I'm assuming both of you have logged WGDC during a pull starting below 2250rpms and are absolutely sure that WGDC is 100% and not 0%???
Keep in mind this rom "works" in my car and I wouldn't call it "trouble"...it starts, runs, builds boost, changes timing and afr etc. It just doesn't work exactly how I want it to in regards to handling WGDC the same way as the 9417 ROM.
If you guys can empirically state that you do not have the same issues, please email me your xml and rom image. christopher.byrne at gmail and I will install ecuflash in a new directory, replace the xml, load your map and change nothing other than the immob code and injector settings and see if I was the source of the error.
Keep in mind this rom "works" in my car and I wouldn't call it "trouble"...it starts, runs, builds boost, changes timing and afr etc. It just doesn't work exactly how I want it to in regards to handling WGDC the same way as the 9417 ROM.
If you guys can empirically state that you do not have the same issues, please email me your xml and rom image. christopher.byrne at gmail and I will install ecuflash in a new directory, replace the xml, load your map and change nothing other than the immob code and injector settings and see if I was the source of the error.
sorry to drift off on this v6 topic but i have a quick question. i just finished the v5.10 for my 2003 evo8 ''rom 94170015'' is this v6 available for this map and is it bug free like the v5.10 and lastly do i have to do this all over again. hahah.thanks guys for the help



