Notices
ECU Flash

TephraMOD V6 - testing!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #751  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
maybe thats the key.

base idle should be "just under" your target idle...
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #752  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
That's possible and worth a shot for those having the problem. Maybe set your BISS idle to 750RPM (stock setting) and use the ECU to raise idle from there.

Edit: I just saw that you said your paypal emails haven't been coming through. I sent you a little the other day...not much, but another donation to thank you for the great work. Just wanted to make sure you got it.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #753  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
I am not getting the p0505 DTC and i'm using the 96530006 ROM from the 96940011 USDM '05 ROM. It's strange that some '05's are having this issue, whilst others are not.

Tephra, when will your V7 be available for use? I'm using v5.10 with great success, but i would like to try V7.

Side Note: I adjusted my BISS to the stock idle of 750rpms, then set the idle to the desired RPM in the ROM. Maybe this is the key.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:06 PM
  #754  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
cool

V7T5 is can be used now. I know of several people using it with no problems.

I would think - barring anything serious - that it will become the final for V7.
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:13 PM
  #755  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by tephra
cool

V7T5 is can be used now. I know of several people using it with no problems.

I would think - barring anything serious - that it will become the final for V7.
Awesome! Where can i get it??
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #756  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
go back a few pages... (maybe 10??)
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 11:59 PM
  #757  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
That's interesting then. Wonder why some have the issue and some don't then..
Indeed.

I've been running it in my personal 05 for awhile with no issues and have probably tuned 10+ 05's with that rom (only use it on the E85 maps switchers) with no issues. I have however had one or two that have had that issue.

It's very odd that 2 out of a dozen or so get it but the rest don't.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #758  
house_of_senate's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: USA
I really want to use the altmap for my e85 tune but I found it necessary to also increase my injector latencies. Any thoughts on this? I could probably just find latencies that my pump and e85 tune are decently happy on, it just wouldnt be dead on.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #759  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
The latencies you plug in are a function of the characteristics of your injectors. If the injectors you are using are linear, you haven't messed with the maf scaling (basically lying to the ecu about airflow levels), and/or any other lying to the ecu then you should not need to change latency values.

However fuel consumption is a characteristic that needs to be adjusted when switching fuels. Thus global injector size and startup IPW needs addressed.

For a data point I'm running 1000cc/min injectors. Just 2 hours ago I went from E85 that I had been running for 3 weeks back to 92 pump. After the ethanol ran through the fuel system you absolutely can not tell that I changed fuels except for the lack of in boost power.

My suggestion is to spend more time with the car. Along the way you will learn a lot of other things and find your problem.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #760  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by house_of_senate
I really want to use the altmap for my e85 tune but I found it necessary to also increase my injector latencies. Any thoughts on this? I could probably just find latencies that my pump and e85 tune are decently happy on, it just wouldnt be dead on.
If you've got the injectors scaled well, the same latencies will work spot-on for both E85 and gasoline.
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #761  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah you will find that your current latencies might be "good enough" for pump, but not "good enough" for E85.

BUT finding the best latencies for E85 will also be the best latencies for pump...
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #762  
evo8dad's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
From: Sellersville, PA
So 96530706 can be used for any VIII? Any plans for a "universal" IX ROM?
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #763  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
96530706 can be used for any 8, except dual solenoid 8's, for which I will do a 96260009.

88570008 *might* become the official IX ROM... pending testing by various users
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #764  
dan l's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: USA
Pending testing as in you have testers or you need testers?
Reply
Old May 14, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #765  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
well if no-one complains about 96530706 V7T5 in the next couple of days I will port that to 88570008 and anyone can try that out.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 PM.