Notices

Evo X Logging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #511  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
I tried logging mode23 today and it did not work. I have Evoscan v2.6beta installed and I am using mrfred's latest xml file posted in this thread. The ECU is flashed with the correct code.

I kept getting the following error code:

Error: Conversion from string "&HLC" to type 'integer' is not valid.

I tried with WDBO2 enabled and disabled and got the same result. I tried with "mode23 mod only below here" checked and unchecked and still got the same results.

When I swapped back to my CAN xml file, the logger worked.

What am I doing wrong?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #512  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by nj1266
I tried logging mode23 today and it did not work. I have Evoscan v2.6beta installed and I am using mrfred's latest xml file posted in this thread. The ECU is flashed with the correct code.

I kept getting the following error code:

Error: Conversion from string "&HLC" to type 'integer' is not valid.

I tried with WDBO2 enabled and disabled and got the same result. I tried with "mode23 mod only below here" checked and unchecked and still got the same results.

When I swapped back to my CAN xml file, the logger worked.

What am I doing wrong?
This is covered in the previous page or the page before that.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #513  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Thanks mrfred.

I do have some questions. Does the TBEC table add/subtract WGDC to the passive or reactive solenoid? Is there a third load to be logged for the boost? I know we can log the timing and fuel load, but is there one for the boost?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #514  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
the passive solenoid is.... passive

hehe
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #515  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
tephra, have you found the intake & exhaust VVT degrees?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #516  
gunzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by SiC
tephra, have you found the intake & exhaust VVT degrees?
Max is 25 intake variation and 35 exhaust ..
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #517  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by gunzo
Max is 25 intake variation and 35 exhaust ..
Yeah, 10-35* for intake and is exhaust +10 to -25*? I was trying to figure this out that's why I wanted to log the VVT degrees.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #518  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
no - funny you should ask, I was looking for them yesterday !
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #519  
gunzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by SiC
Yeah, 10-35* for intake and is exhaust +10 to -25*? I was trying to figure this out that's why I wanted to log the VVT degrees.
Hmm .. thought I passed them to you ?? .. they are correct you know

it's 10-35 intake opening referenced BTDC

0-35 exhaust closing referenced ATDC
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #520  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by gunzo
Hmm .. thought I passed them to you ?? .. they are correct you know

it's 10-35 intake opening referenced BTDC

0-35 exhaust closing referenced ATDC
Okay, I think the formulas may be off, I'm seeing -12* (peak load WOT) to +21* (idle) for intake.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:45 PM
  #521  
gunzo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
Originally Posted by SiC
Okay, I think the formulas may be off, I'm seeing -12* (peak load WOT) to +21* (idle) for intake.
2byte ???

ok .. I'll go check and pm you
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #522  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by gunzo
2byte ???

ok .. I'll go check and pm you
Yes, 2byte
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 11:03 PM
  #523  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by tephra
the passive solenoid is.... passive

hehe
So you are saying that WGDCC changes are based off of the reactive solenoid that is maxxed out at 100% at WOT unless you are running a pill? So how does the WGDCC react or correct when the reactive solenoid is at 100%? Have you logged it? Can you post the log of passive and reactive solenoids and WGDCC during a WOT run?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #524  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 1
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by nj1266
So you are saying that WGDCC changes are based off of the reactive solenoid that is maxxed out at 100% at WOT unless you are running a pill? So how does the WGDCC react or correct when the reactive solenoid is at 100%? Have you logged it? Can you post the log of passive and reactive solenoids and WGDCC during a WOT run?
It pulls from the reactive solenoid if needed. I've seen it in logs. The passive solenoid is a odd feature.

When still using both solenoids and bigger turbos you can have the passive set at 0 and reactive set at a certain %. The curve will not be "full" like a single solenoid until you start using the passive solenoid %.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #525  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I have discovered that the ECU uses the following scaling for the OBD_MAP signal (ie mode1 pid 0xb)

kpa = adc_map * 1.345 + 0.25

the ECU also caps this at 255kpa (as per the standard )
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:45 AM.