Evo X Logging
I tried logging mode23 today and it did not work. I have Evoscan v2.6beta installed and I am using mrfred's latest xml file posted in this thread. The ECU is flashed with the correct code.
I kept getting the following error code:
Error: Conversion from string "&HLC" to type 'integer' is not valid.
I tried with WDBO2 enabled and disabled and got the same result. I tried with "mode23 mod only below here" checked and unchecked and still got the same results.
When I swapped back to my CAN xml file, the logger worked.
What am I doing wrong?
I kept getting the following error code:
Error: Conversion from string "&HLC" to type 'integer' is not valid.
I tried with WDBO2 enabled and disabled and got the same result. I tried with "mode23 mod only below here" checked and unchecked and still got the same results.
When I swapped back to my CAN xml file, the logger worked.
What am I doing wrong?
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I tried logging mode23 today and it did not work. I have Evoscan v2.6beta installed and I am using mrfred's latest xml file posted in this thread. The ECU is flashed with the correct code.
I kept getting the following error code:
Error: Conversion from string "&HLC" to type 'integer' is not valid.
I tried with WDBO2 enabled and disabled and got the same result. I tried with "mode23 mod only below here" checked and unchecked and still got the same results.
When I swapped back to my CAN xml file, the logger worked.
What am I doing wrong?
I kept getting the following error code:
Error: Conversion from string "&HLC" to type 'integer' is not valid.
I tried with WDBO2 enabled and disabled and got the same result. I tried with "mode23 mod only below here" checked and unchecked and still got the same results.
When I swapped back to my CAN xml file, the logger worked.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks mrfred.
I do have some questions. Does the TBEC table add/subtract WGDC to the passive or reactive solenoid? Is there a third load to be logged for the boost? I know we can log the timing and fuel load, but is there one for the boost?
I do have some questions. Does the TBEC table add/subtract WGDC to the passive or reactive solenoid? Is there a third load to be logged for the boost? I know we can log the timing and fuel load, but is there one for the boost?
So you are saying that WGDCC changes are based off of the reactive solenoid that is maxxed out at 100% at WOT unless you are running a pill? So how does the WGDCC react or correct when the reactive solenoid is at 100%? Have you logged it? Can you post the log of passive and reactive solenoids and WGDCC during a WOT run?
So you are saying that WGDCC changes are based off of the reactive solenoid that is maxxed out at 100% at WOT unless you are running a pill? So how does the WGDCC react or correct when the reactive solenoid is at 100%? Have you logged it? Can you post the log of passive and reactive solenoids and WGDCC during a WOT run?
When still using both solenoids and bigger turbos you can have the passive set at 0 and reactive set at a certain %. The curve will not be "full" like a single solenoid until you start using the passive solenoid %.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I have discovered that the ECU uses the following scaling for the OBD_MAP signal (ie mode1 pid 0xb)
kpa = adc_map * 1.345 + 0.25
the ECU also caps this at 255kpa (as per the standard
)
kpa = adc_map * 1.345 + 0.25
the ECU also caps this at 255kpa (as per the standard
)




.. they are correct you know
2byte ???