Notices
ECU Flash

TephraMod V7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2010 | 05:05 AM
  #1741  
chmodlf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by tephra
i thought i already setup either 00/01 or 02/03 with 2byte_airflow?
Yes 2byte airflow is MUT 02-03.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 07:56 PM
  #1742  
AutoXer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
From: Logan, WV
Originally Posted by AutoXer
After about an hour of searching and sifting, I have to ask. Can someone explain the MUT table in 94170715?

The 2-byte values locations don't look right.

MUT 00 + 01 = 8450 + 8451
MUT 02 + 03 = 89E2 + 89E3
MUT 04 + 05 = Stock

According to The Official 2-Byte thread, the MUT addresses should be:

2byte load
MUT 00 = 895C
MUT 01 = 895D

2byte RPM
MUT 02 = 893A
MUT 03 = 893B

2byte AirFlow
MUT 04 = 89BA
MUT 05 = 89BB

Yes, I've been reading up on Baro and Temp compensated load. None of those addresses seem to match up with what's in the MUT table(00-03).
Originally Posted by Raceghost
On a side note, 2 byte still works. You can utilize it, if you want to change your MUT addresses, or download the latest rom deffinition from Appauldd like I was suggesting.
OK. Anybody know the barometer and temperature compensated load MUT addresses?
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #1743  
PlanoEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 706
Likes: 2
From: My House
Is there any known issues with fuel trim logging problems using V7 with evoscan. I tried unsucessfully tonight on different laptops to log fuel trims and neither worked using two different versions of evoscan leading me to believe the problem is in V7.
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #1744  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
what version of V7 you using?

fuel trims should be fine, unless one of the custom roms has somehow disabled closed loop...
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #1745  
PlanoEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 706
Likes: 2
From: My House
Originally Posted by tephra
what version of V7 you using?

fuel trims should be fine, unless one of the custom roms has somehow disabled closed loop...
I used the 88590715
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 10:35 PM
  #1746  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
so not one of the preconfigured SD rom's? just the ROM straight from my zip?
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #1747  
PlanoEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 706
Likes: 2
From: My House
Originally Posted by tephra
so not one of the preconfigured SD rom's? just the ROM straight from my zip?
yes pm Kracka he was manning the laptops and can tell you exactly what was going on
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 10:40 PM
  #1748  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
i'll wait until he chimes in
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 04:43 AM
  #1749  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
im assuming you had the rear O2 turned off...
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 06:54 AM
  #1750  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
First off let me just say that I don't have any experience using Tephra V7, I've always been a huge fan of V5.10 so thats what I've stuck with for quite some time. PlanoEvo put V7 on his car and I was merely logging it.

Fuel trims (low, mid, high) were not adjusting and were just staying at the default "zero" of .1008 even though we drove for over an hour trying to get them to adjust. O2 feedback trim was cycling normally and as expected. We tried two different laptops running different versions of EvoScan with the same result.

PlanoEvo - My recommendation is to switch back to V5.10 since it was working perfectly for us last week.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 07:45 AM
  #1751  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
well ive seen fuel trims just stop working sometimes... not sure what the problem is...

maybe just reflash the V7 rom again...
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 10:21 AM
  #1752  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
OK thanks. I'll have him reflash the same ROM back on and if that doesn't work we'll just go back to V5.10 and go from there.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #1753  
tnt1106's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Kracka
OK thanks. I'll have him reflash the same ROM back on and if that doesn't work we'll just go back to V5.10 and go from there.
if you are using one of phenems / recompile 88590715 rom's it may have the rear O2 delete mod (somehow in addition to Tephra's?) and when I first changed to V7 this did not allow me to log fuel trims. look under the per bit section and disable that mod.




side note: Tephra, any suggestions on why in the 88591715 the gear does not use (or display in evoscan) properly? I get:
logged / used Gear=1 (for 1rst - 2nd)

Then: Gear=2 (for 3rd=5th)

The gear based boost worked 100% correctly in V6.

Thanks!
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #1754  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
hrmmm.... the only thing i can think of is the MUT addresses have changed... can you let me know what MUTID your logging and what it points to?
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 05:53 PM
  #1755  
tnt1106's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by tephra
hrmmm.... the only thing i can think of is the MUT addresses have changed... can you let me know what MUTID your logging and what it points to?
Evoscan:

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Boost Error" LogReference="BoostError" RequestID="8A" Eval="0.0241*x-3.087" Unit="psi" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-5" GaugeMax="5" ChartMin="-5" ChartMax="5" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="false" />

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Gear" LogReference="Gear" RequestID="40" Eval="x" Unit="units" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="5" Visible="False" />

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVERAGE" LogReference="RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVERAGE" RequestID="42" RequestID2="43" Eval="x/36.37" Unit="rpm/kph" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />



MUT 40 = 8447

MUT 42 = 8448

MUT 43 = 8449

Last edited by tnt1106; May 4, 2010 at 05:56 PM. Reason: mut 43
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:31 AM.