TephraMod V7
After about an hour of searching and sifting, I have to ask. Can someone explain the MUT table in 94170715?
The 2-byte values locations don't look right.
MUT 00 + 01 = 8450 + 8451
MUT 02 + 03 = 89E2 + 89E3
MUT 04 + 05 = Stock
According to The Official 2-Byte thread, the MUT addresses should be:
2byte load
MUT 00 = 895C
MUT 01 = 895D
2byte RPM
MUT 02 = 893A
MUT 03 = 893B
2byte AirFlow
MUT 04 = 89BA
MUT 05 = 89BB
Yes, I've been reading up on Baro and Temp compensated load. None of those addresses seem to match up with what's in the MUT table(00-03).
The 2-byte values locations don't look right.
MUT 00 + 01 = 8450 + 8451
MUT 02 + 03 = 89E2 + 89E3
MUT 04 + 05 = Stock
According to The Official 2-Byte thread, the MUT addresses should be:
2byte load
MUT 00 = 895C
MUT 01 = 895D
2byte RPM
MUT 02 = 893A
MUT 03 = 893B
2byte AirFlow
MUT 04 = 89BA
MUT 05 = 89BB
Yes, I've been reading up on Baro and Temp compensated load. None of those addresses seem to match up with what's in the MUT table(00-03).
Is there any known issues with fuel trim logging problems using V7 with evoscan. I tried unsucessfully tonight on different laptops to log fuel trims and neither worked using two different versions of evoscan leading me to believe the problem is in V7.
First off let me just say that I don't have any experience using Tephra V7, I've always been a huge fan of V5.10 so thats what I've stuck with for quite some time. PlanoEvo put V7 on his car and I was merely logging it.
Fuel trims (low, mid, high) were not adjusting and were just staying at the default "zero" of .1008 even though we drove for over an hour trying to get them to adjust. O2 feedback trim was cycling normally and as expected. We tried two different laptops running different versions of EvoScan with the same result.
PlanoEvo - My recommendation is to switch back to V5.10 since it was working perfectly for us last week.
Fuel trims (low, mid, high) were not adjusting and were just staying at the default "zero" of .1008 even though we drove for over an hour trying to get them to adjust. O2 feedback trim was cycling normally and as expected. We tried two different laptops running different versions of EvoScan with the same result.
PlanoEvo - My recommendation is to switch back to V5.10 since it was working perfectly for us last week.
side note: Tephra, any suggestions on why in the 88591715 the gear does not use (or display in evoscan) properly? I get:
logged / used Gear=1 (for 1rst - 2nd)
Then: Gear=2 (for 3rd=5th)
The gear based boost worked 100% correctly in V6.
Thanks!
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Boost Error" LogReference="BoostError" RequestID="8A" Eval="0.0241*x-3.087" Unit="psi" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-5" GaugeMax="5" ChartMin="-5" ChartMax="5" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="false" />
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Gear" LogReference="Gear" RequestID="40" Eval="x" Unit="units" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="5" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVERAGE" LogReference="RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVERAGE" RequestID="42" RequestID2="43" Eval="x/36.37" Unit="rpm/kph" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
MUT 40 = 8447
MUT 42 = 8448
MUT 43 = 8449
Last edited by tnt1106; May 4, 2010 at 05:56 PM. Reason: mut 43



