Notices
ECU Flash

**Need Help setting up V7???** Here is your answer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 01:05 PM
  #196  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I ran into an odd problem using PSI boost control with the 96530706 rom. While the WGDC baseline table works fine (switching gears, etc.), the boost error is almost always positive no matter what I set the boost target to. As a result, I get essentially no boost when I put non-zero values in the boost error adjustment table, since the ECU tries to "correct" my boost to a bogus error value.

Take a look at this log (2&3 gear pull without error correction turned on). The target boost is set to 23 psi (+14.7 PSI boost adder), but the boost error is always max positive.



Just to make sure it wasn't Evoscan logging wrong, I did turn on boost control and did a 3rd gear pull - you can see the ECU "correcting" the boost as low as possible (last column).



for reference, here are my settings and desired boost table:





any idea what might be causing this and how to fix it?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 06:51 PM
  #197  
phenem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 4
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by voidhawk
I ran into an odd problem using PSI boost control with the 96530706 rom. While the WGDC baseline table works fine (switching gears, etc.), the boost error is almost always positive no matter what I set the boost target to. As a result, I get essentially no boost when I put non-zero values in the boost error adjustment table, since the ECU tries to "correct" my boost to a bogus error value.

Take a look at this log (2&3 gear pull without error correction turned on). The target boost is set to 23 psi (+14.7 PSI boost adder), but the boost error is always max positive.


Just to make sure it wasn't Evoscan logging wrong, I did turn on boost control and did a 3rd gear pull - you can see the ECU "correcting" the boost as low as possible (last column).


for reference, here are my settings and desired boost table:


any idea what might be causing this and how to fix it?
Looks like you boost adder is wrong. The scaling you are using is +7.4 so you can go to 32 psi on the boost map. That means your boost adder needs to be 14.7 + 7.4 = 22.1

Make that change and you should be good to go.

Read this thread that I posted so you will understand: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/8092815-post1543.html
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 10:30 PM
  #198  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by phenem
Looks like you boost adder is wrong. The scaling you are using is +7.4 so you can go to 32 psi on the boost map. That means your boost adder needs to be 14.7 + 7.4 = 22.1

Make that change and you should be good to go.

Read this thread that I posted so you will understand: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/8092815-post1543.html
Thanks phenem - I have never used/edited map scaling before and did not realize it was there. Looking around in the ROM I went to the "Boost Desired Engine 'PSI'" table, then "edit" and "Edit Map Definition". Under "Scaling" it currently shows "PSIa8 OMNI4barMAP-Adj".

Since I never boost over 26psi, I don't need the extra headroom and would like to set my boost simply as "boost adder" + "target_value" = "total pressure" (using 14.7 as the adder since I'm at sea level and adding the desired boost value of 23 psi). In order to accomplish this, is all I need to do change the "Scaling" to "PSIa8 JDM3barMAP" in the drop down menu? Also, do I change just the one table or are there more I need to change to make this work?

Thanks again for all the work you put into this!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #199  
ace33joe's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 7
From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Originally Posted by voidhawk
Thanks phenem - I have never used/edited map scaling before and did not realize it was there. Looking around in the ROM I went to the "Boost Desired Engine 'PSI'" table, then "edit" and "Edit Map Definition". Under "Scaling" it currently shows "PSIa8 OMNI4barMAP-Adj".

Since I never boost over 26psi, I don't need the extra headroom and would like to set my boost simply as "boost adder" + "target_value" = "total pressure" (using 14.7 as the adder since I'm at sea level and adding the desired boost value of 23 psi). In order to accomplish this, is all I need to do change the "Scaling" to "PSIa8 JDM3barMAP" in the drop down menu? Also, do I change just the one table or are there more I need to change to make this work?

Thanks again for all the work you put into this!
You need to match the scaling depending on the MAP sensor you have. I am using Omni4barMAP scaling for my Omni 4 bar sensor.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 10:41 PM
  #200  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by ace33joe
You need to match the scaling depending on the MAP sensor you have. I am using Omni4barMAP scaling for my Omni 4 bar sensor.
You're right, I missed that step. I'm using a JDM 3bar and the scaling in the boost adder and the target boost table were set to the Omni. After I changed it, all the values in the table updated to 12 psi for the boost adder and 12.7 psi peak for the boost target, which made my absolute pressure target 24.7 psi (~10psi boost), which is exactly what the ECU was trying to correct to -> mystery explained. Thanks everyone!
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2010 | 01:36 PM
  #201  
cssaddictm4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
I have looked in various areas, I see scaling for JDM 3 Bar and OMNI 4 bar. Is there a specified scaling for the AEM 5 bar map? Or able to scale the AEM as a 3.5 bar etc?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:15 PM
  #202  
ace33joe's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 7
From: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
After some more test

I am quoting myself again, but it seems I also have accel/decel enrich/enlean problem as other USDM EVOs with 96530706 rom.

I tried possible solutions posted here and there in this forum (such as decel fuel cut delay), but no success yet.

What would be the difference between 05 EDM EVO and 03 USDM EVO hardware-wise?

I know all ISCV stepping motor unit and throttlebody part numbers are different between 05 and 03-04 EVOs, but is there any other hardware changes that might affect fueling?


Originally Posted by ace33joe
Sorry for keep quoting myself, but here is another update.

I switched to 96530706, the universal VIII rom, and thanks to various tips from members with 03/04 USDM EVOs, it seems it is working ok.

Gear based boost control and boost error logging now work fine!

Only thing I noticed was that it idles at higher rpm (like ~1000 rather than near 850) even after warm-up, so it felt like BISS is more open.

I will adjust BISS using SAS mode from Evoscan, and see if it solves the high rpm problem.

If someone with 03/04 USDM EVO VIII has the same problem with gear base boost control, please try 96530706 rom.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:25 PM
  #203  
Appauldd's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 7
From: Northern KY near Cincy
If you are going to 9653 with an VIII 03 or 04 you need to make sure all of the tables match 9417 settings before attempting to tune anything. (The exception here is the Peripheries as they differ greatly....leave the 9653 peripheries as they are)

As for the gear based boost control, you need to make sure to set up the "RPM Speed to Gear" table properly.

0 6
43.3186 5
61.9912 4
84.6903 3
117.301 2
176.195 1
2899.78 0

"Main Map Wastegate Duty" for the 0 and the 6 gear columns should be all 0

Lastly, your MAP sensor must be set up correctly as well.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #204  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Boost control (using the JDM MAP sensor with PSI control) is now dialed in and working well for me, thanks for all the help everyone!

However, I've run into a snag with my idle: while the car idles fine in most situations (cold start, neutral, etc), whenever I clutch in and come to a (near) stop right after hard acceleration/braking, the idle momentarily drops very low (close to stalling).

Any ideas what table to tweak to fix this? My current (self-tuned) ROM is linked here if you want to look at stuff. Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #205  
Asmodeus6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by voidhawk
Boost control (using the JDM MAP sensor with PSI control) is now dialed in and working well for me, thanks for all the help everyone!

However, I've run into a snag with my idle: while the car idles fine in most situations (cold start, neutral, etc), whenever I clutch in and come to a (near) stop right after hard acceleration/braking, the idle momentarily drops very low (close to stalling).

Any ideas what table to tweak to fix this? My current (self-tuned) ROM is linked here if you want to look at stuff. Thanks!
Usually an indication of a boost leak unless you are SD too?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #206  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by Asmodeus6
Usually an indication of a boost leak unless you are SD too?
Hmm ... I'm not running SD, just PSI based boost control with the JDM3bar. Might be time to do a leak check, although I don't remember having this problem before I switched to v7. Still worth a try though - thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #207  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
here is a quick check of what is different, although it occurs to me you may be going lean or...

better send me you email, can't upload(?)

iscv and decel are a lot different

Last edited by nothere; Apr 6, 2010 at 06:39 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 07:59 PM
  #208  
voidhawk's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Originally Posted by nothere
here is a quick check of what is different, although it occurs to me you may be going lean or...

better send me you email, can't upload(?)

iscv and decel are a lot different
ralph(at)open-aerospace(dot)org - thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2010 | 08:24 PM
  #209  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
here, try this;

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0Bz5...NDgwZTA4&hl=en

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0Bz5...MTA5NGUz&hl=en

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0Bz5...MTEyMGE5&hl=en
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2010 | 01:19 AM
  #210  
Raceghost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 21
From: Out West
Anyone seeing an issue with the gear based boost crossover. No 6 th gear here, and I just copied what was in the 5th gear location to 6th gear? Same goes for the 0 column...? Does this function work strictly off of the speed to gear? I hope I dont need the MAT sensor upgrade. I am still on MAF. I assumed when i read the initial post by MFRED that it would run on the stock MAF.

Also, trying to tune and the boost error in my logs stays the same, -3.048...any thoughts?
The boost is registering, the WGDC is registering, I have verified the EvoScan deffinitons are correct, running out of thoughts.

My ROM deff is 94170715.

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by Raceghost; Apr 8, 2010 at 01:29 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 PM.