Notices
ECU Flash

This look like MBT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 05:12 AM
  #1  
Benja's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia.
This look like MBT?

Hey dudes,

Pretty positive i've hit MBT finishing off the tune on the Prancer tonight.
Upped the mid range timing with nice 10-15tq gains.
Upped the timing above 6k with no gains at all, 2 back to back pulls showed no gains, dropped it back to the previous setting and torque stayed the same.

Fuel is ~E70-75.

Graph below.



First run is the average out of 3 base lines.
Second run is added mid range timing, and the higher top end timing
Third run is the added mid range timing, but the top end timing of the first run.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 06:36 AM
  #2  
andrewzaragoza's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 2
From: DFW, TX
i can't be positive if its past mbt. but i think you could use a few more psi of boost.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 06:51 PM
  #3  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Depends on how consistent you were with the pulls. Same stretch of road, going the same direction, starting at the same speed and run conditions (ECT, throttle application, similar driving conditions before the pull, etc.) How do the 3 baseline runs compare? Do they have max/mins above and below the test runs? If so, you might not be getting consistent enough pulls to find MBT at all.

Did you try upping the mid-range timing any further?

Looks like 5500-6500 might be about right, 6500+ might actually prefer the higher timing so you may not be ramping it in fast enough. Hard to say though, could just be the smoothing.

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Apr 19, 2011 at 06:53 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #4  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
What is your timing at now?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 11:19 PM
  #5  
Benja's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Newcastle, Australia.
Same stretch of road, same direction, start point.
3 baseline pulls were within 3nm of each other.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #6  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Mind posting a plot with just your 3 baseline pulls? Just looking to see how consistent your data is, not really concerned about the peak numbers though.
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #7  
C130flyer's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 464
Likes: 1
From: Elizabeth City, NC
seems rich to me, add more boost and lean it out to 11.8
Reply
Old May 18, 2011 | 11:00 PM
  #8  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by C130flyer
seems rich to me, add more boost and lean it out to 11.8
Its running 12:1 ish right now, i think your looking at the boost side.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PIE-R
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
6
Dec 21, 2019 08:14 PM
darwin_evo
E85 / Ethanol
10
Jul 10, 2017 07:57 AM
l2r99gst
Midwest Region
11
Jun 14, 2010 02:20 PM
tonyboy
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
4
Feb 28, 2010 05:08 PM
SlowCar
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Sep 18, 2005 12:53 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 AM.