How much is the arduino? I'd hate to have to use a piggy back, it's kind of defeats the purpose of this whole factory ALS issue. Don't you think that -20 are good enough to produce some decent PSIs with the right amount of fuel/air mixture? As an example, I get 15psi of boost at -5 when antilag launch control is enabled vs only 4psi without antilag at 5500rpm. Off course, LC antilag is supported by a humongous amount of air/fuel

 

Well the arduino is 30 usd, so its relatively cheap. I agree piggy back is not in my favor. However if some of the user interface, or function simply cannot be accomplished with stock ecu. a 30 dollar piggy back would totally be worth the effort and would support things 0-5v and pwm should we need a little better control than the stock ecu offers. again for the ability and added control, i really dont thing it would be a terrible thing to have to add a piggy back. Also something this simple would offer support for those older cars that did not have the modern ecu programming to run the sas from the factory. Granted i will be attempting to work ALS out on a SD2.0 rom and go back to a 8858 v7 if I have to.

-20 should be good, ill know soon enough!

 

Foxbat, got your package today. Thanks so much! now we begin this process! Laraimie pm me!

 

PM sent.

 

Faster than expected :]
You might need to enlarge the holes on the banjo bolts so they are roughly the same diameter as the sas pipework.

Please keep me posted & let me know in case you require any further parts.

 

^ 6.5mm should be ok, maybe up to 7.5mm.

 

Drilled at 6.35 or .25" already. I will go larger. 7.14 or 7.9 are my next choices.. im gonna go bigger based on we need more. Does this need to flow like a proper bpv?

 

Ratsbud did you get my pm?

 

yup, sorry, I was just plannin to mail it out, this thing seriously wont cost peanuts to ship.

PS punched them holes out to 7.9mm today. Which is quite large to look at.

I cant wait for boost on overrun. Theres a sd 2.0 rom that has SAS programming in it too.. neato!

 

I now have a total of 4 holes 5/16= 7.9mm in the banjo's. I am noticing a significant difference in flow of the runners. The short side/near side banjo gets a lot more airflow than the far side/passenger side banjo. I think, that I will need to balance the flow a little more some how.

What are youre guys thoughts on that?

 

This might be normal since the short side is closer to the valve, in later WRC Evos both banjos were installed on the driver side. What kind of BOV are u using? With pops'n'bangs a recirculation-type bov would help produce louder, machine gun kind of bangs. It would be great if u could post some pics as you go along!
Are you going SD?

 

Ive been on sd for a while. I did find thar theres a sd rom for sas vehicles .. ausdm ix .. jb says it can be done on a standard rom maf or sd.. i dont get that idea totally yet. I am using a greddy type s recirc.. i may consider no bpv at all if that helps function.

 

Laramie: ill send your can out tomorrow.

I got a decent fixup on a sas mani from another member in the us.

Really appreciate everything that you folks are helping me and others achieve here. I intend no secrets of the sucess or failures of this. Group high five haha.. sigh

 

Thanks.
What manifold are you going to use?

 

Stock e7 mani.