88770005 xml needed !!!! please help
88770005 xml needed !!!! please help
does anyone has correct xml for 88770005 ? ( Evo 9 GT wagon 6 speed )
I really need it, cuz i couldn't read my rom properly because the one that i have, it messed up and not correctly xml
if anyone has it please let me know as soon as possible
or you could email me xml to LTHANAKRITL@GMAIL.com
Thank you in advance !!!!!!
I really need it, cuz i couldn't read my rom properly because the one that i have, it messed up and not correctly xml
if anyone has it please let me know as soon as possible
or you could email me xml to LTHANAKRITL@GMAIL.com
Thank you in advance !!!!!!
Thank you! I'm in Thailand now. And try to read all table. For now timing map, fuel map, are fine. But im going to use 3 port which i need to use Max wastegate table but the table value are not line up like what it should be. Dont u have to complete one?
I'm still running the stock setup boost solenoid (twin 2 ports), hitting around 23psi at redline and still climbing (logged through JDM MAP sensor). Unfortunately my car was tuned by a local tuner here using ECUTEK, which has a very good definition for the wagon ROM. Unfortunate because ECUTEK does not allow public use of their software.
If you find the correct addresses for boost control, can you let me know? I need to adjust my WGDC and reduce my boost a fraction.
Trending Topics
In the XML there is <!-- *** Turbo Wastegate Control, Single Solenoid *** -->, I'm using a twin 2 port solenoid setup, which I thought was a stock JDM setup. Is this XML definition not suitable for my solenoid setup?
If I'm good to use these tables, how would I adjust to reduce my boost a little? (I'm getting boost creep till it hits fuel cut, near the top end).
Interesting that it only displays correctly in a certain version of ECUFlash, I open it in that version and post back.
Cheers.
Right, I've downloaded ECUFlash 1.44.3719, done a bit of mucking around with rommetadata locations (only because I've mucked around with them previously for some weird issues I was having a while ago). And now I get the following tables:

Much much better, it's quite relieving to finally have a a good definition opening properly after looking for so long. Thanks for the help Todd.

Much much better, it's quite relieving to finally have a a good definition opening properly after looking for so long. Thanks for the help Todd.



