This is all I see when I quote text for the table definition....

"The table definition is listed below for the USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM. <strong>For the 94170015 ROM, change &quot;31db&quot; to &quot;37c7&quot;.</strong> <strong>For the 96530006 ROM, change &quot;31db&quot; to &quot;37c7&quot;.</strong> <strong>For the 90550001 ROM, change &quot;31db&quot; to &quot;3977&quot;.</strong> <strong>USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM</strong>&nbsp;</p><table></table><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.016 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.048 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.080 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.112 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.144 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.176 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.208 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.240 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.272 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.304 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.336 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.368 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.400 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.432 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.464 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.496 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.528 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.560 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.592 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.624 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.656 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.688 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.720 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.752 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.784 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.816 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.848 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.880 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.912 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.944 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.976 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.008 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.040 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.072 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.104 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.136 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.168 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.200 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.232 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.264 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.296 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.328 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.360 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.392 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.424 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.456 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.488 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.520 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.552 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.584 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.616 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.648 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.680 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.712 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.744 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.776 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.808 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.840 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.872 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.904 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.936 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.968 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.000 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.032 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.064 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.096"

there's no definition/address or scaling...just numbers.
Am I missing something???

 

Quoting the post worked when I first tried it. Its not now though. It appears that the admins are trying to fix all these definitions but not doing it in a way that preserves the original information. I'll check to see what they are doing because I really don't want to have to redo all my posts with this kind of information.

 

thanks for the help mrfred! Would certainly be painful to redo all that work.

 

Looks like its only this thread so far. Others have not yet been altered, so they should look ok once the bug is fixed.

 

<p>Hey I apologize, but is a bug that should be fixed this week, I hope.&nbsp;</p><p>Bob</p><p>https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/si...l#post11496812</p>

 

Can Mr. Fred or someone else please repost the table definition as the bug fix doesn't seem to be happening? Thanks a lot.

 

Hi,

I'm trying to figure out a work around for now as the text is still intact in the post but not visible.

Bob

 

I will see what I can do with 9563 right now...

We have the table address, but need the scalings which I would assume would be hex16? but need the x axis address?

 

ok folks, its fixed. The problem is that the new EvoM text parser is interpreting anything with a &lt; or &gt; as being a parser command. When it encounters the ECUFlash definitions, rather than ignorning the incomprehensible command, it decides to delete it. Yay.

 

The LINEARIZATION TABLE AND CLOSED LOOP INTEGRAL GAIN addresses are the same for 9417 and 9653 ???? ill be using FIC 1450s for 9653.

 

I fixed my first post yesterday. It's had the pulsewidth linearization table information on 9417 and 9653 for a while. I don't have the closed loop integral gain table.

 

Thank you!

 

Thanks alot mfred, yours and all the disassemblers contribution for stock ecu is amazing.. added the table..

also added integral gain table. waiting for injectors to arrive .

 

Maybe I am going off topic, but where did you get the integral gain table from? I ma using mrfred's wideband closed loop patch. It works fairly well but it doesn't keep the AFRs as tight as the factory narrow band closed loop. Likely due to the fact that my wideband sensor is further down the exhaust. Tweaking the gain may improve the response.

 

it was in this thread or some other thread which i was searching from. Some one posted it the code wasnt showing, i replied with a quote and got the code. Still havnt tested it yet, however ill post it here once i get back home.