Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

FP RED dyno results thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2008, 06:34 PM
  #46  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On the track
Posts: 4,358
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
^ Post the graph!
Old Nov 23, 2008, 06:53 PM
  #47  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
sniper3818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03evo8gsr
got mine dynoed at tunin tech a couple days ago. my evo 8 made 444hp and 368 tq on 91+meth at 21-22psi. had a problem the failsafe triggering during the tune. alfred found the problem, it was the the boost bypass valve. been having a problem with my meth kit and will be switching over to aquamist as sugested by alfed. going for another tune in about 2 weeks ,and hoping everything goes good

Those are some wicked numbers kid
Old Nov 23, 2008, 09:22 PM
  #48  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
03evo8gsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks sniper3818 ill try to post the graph
Old Nov 26, 2008, 03:52 PM
  #49  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
evo8fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: hunting v8s
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here is mine
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=383178
Name:  100_1484.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  39.7 KB
Old Nov 26, 2008, 07:18 PM
  #50  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
El.BlueEvo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ORLANDO, FLORIDA
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine is on my sig..............93 octane no meth stock cams and gears, @27psi...........Awsome turbo, still holding 450+ at 7800

Last edited by El.BlueEvo9; Nov 26, 2008 at 07:25 PM.
Old Nov 26, 2008, 07:21 PM
  #51  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This thread almost makes me wanna say screw my stock turbo goal and go ahead and slap on my FP Red. No I just cant! I only have to wait till Dec 14th's private track event. DAMNIT!!! lol
Old Nov 27, 2008, 09:22 AM
  #52  
Evolved Member
 
dastallion951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: riverside, ca
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
will have dyno graph of my 03 evo8 with fp red on shortly....
car is at tuning tech in colton,ca
goin with built 2.0 block je pistons eagle rods acl race bearings arp main rod and head studs, supertech valve train, 5 angle valve job with stock valves, fp red, balanceshaft eliminator kit, 1 step colder spark plugs, aem wideband(i know no performance mod there), + what i have on already xs engineering fmic and piping, 880 injectors, walbro pump, hks 272 i&e cams, full 3" turboback exhaust including 02 housing, hks ssq bov, dejon tool....
anyone think with these mods i should be able to break 400awhp on a dynojet, on just 91 cali octane?
Old Nov 27, 2008, 07:55 PM
  #53  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
MitsoKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so, right now i'm running a stock turbo setup with a few bolt-ons and stock internals (minus carillo rods). i havn't looked into the FPRed turbo yet but I like what I see with the powerbands on these dynoes. What would be a good setup for one? Header, 02 Housing, ect.?

I'm looking to make 400whp max with a steady curve up to around 6,800.. I'm not looking for a crazy power car. It looks like this turbo is pretty good lag wise too??

Last edited by MitsoKid; Nov 27, 2008 at 08:15 PM.
Old Nov 28, 2008, 12:34 PM
  #54  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (85)
 
Levar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,438
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I have an E85 station less than five miles from my house so any turbo upgrade will have it in the equation. In the near term, the stock IX turbo/E85 combination is working wonders. I do not want to have to buy a double pumper to run the FP Red so I've basically gone away from even considering it as an option. The reason being is that IMO the FP Red has to run on higher boost levels with either E85 or race gas for it to come to life. I just don't think a FP Red on pump gas would be more exciting than the stock IX turbo/E85 combination. I'm open to comments and feedbacks from different perspectives. Thanks!
Old Nov 28, 2008, 02:12 PM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
PsychDr. HN$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 564
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the RED is def a winner
Old Nov 29, 2008, 06:49 AM
  #56  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
El.BlueEvo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ORLANDO, FLORIDA
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pure_evo
I have an E85 station less than five miles from my house so any turbo upgrade will have it in the equation. In the near term, the stock IX turbo/E85 combination is working wonders. I do not want to have to buy a double pumper to run the FP Red so I've basically gone away from even considering it as an option. The reason being is that IMO the FP Red has to run on higher boost levels with either E85 or race gas for it to come to life. I just don't think a FP Red on pump gas would be more exciting than the stock IX turbo/E85 combination. I'm open to comments and feedbacks from different perspectives. Thanks!
Mine was on pure 93octane with no meth or other power additives.
Old Nov 29, 2008, 07:19 AM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (85)
 
Levar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,438
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by El.BlueEvo9
Mine was on pure 93octane with no meth or other power additives.
Manny, I see your point. Seriously, when are you hitting full boost? Also, I see what your Red held at 7800 but I won't be in that area until after my Kelford 272s with springs and retainers are installed. I'm wondering (someone please chime in) if 1200cc injectors would work in lieu of the double pumper.
Old Nov 29, 2008, 01:21 PM
  #58  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Davethewave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yo

Originally Posted by pure_evo
Manny, I see your point. Seriously, when are you hitting full boost? Also, I see what your Red held at 7800 but I won't be in that area until after my Kelford 272s with springs and retainers are installed. I'm wondering (someone please chime in) if 1200cc injectors would work in lieu of the double pumper.
you do not need springs and retainers for the kelford 272's. you'll actually lose power if you put stiffer springs with those cams. good choice on cams though.
Old Nov 30, 2008, 11:10 AM
  #59  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (85)
 
Levar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,438
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I've read through every post thus far in this thread. Over this weekend, I've also read through a couple hundred posts about the BBK Full and Lite turbos as well. I'm one that's tinkering on the fence still undecided about which route is best. On the Mustang dynos, I'm seeing that the average is roughly 369-466whp with roughly 330-378wtq and on Dynojet dynos the average is roughly 376-466whp and 367-415wtq. And when E85 is/was used, it was roughly 470whp and 415wtq. I understand that there are many, many, variables when comparing numbers but to me it's nice to see just to get a general feel of how the FP Red is stacking up on normal day-to-day EVOs. It was/is nice to see some of you going away from the double pumper route as it was a concern of mine and an expense I wasn't too thrilled to make. There was also talk about upgrading the stock ignition system. Would the HKS ignition upgrade suffice? Thanks.
Old Nov 30, 2008, 09:16 PM
  #60  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
04AWDTURBOEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 882
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by pure_evo
I've read through every post thus far in this thread. Over this weekend, I've also read through a couple hundred posts about the BBK Full and Lite turbos as well. I'm one that's tinkering on the fence still undecided about which route is best. On the Mustang dynos, I'm seeing that the average is roughly 369-466whp with roughly 330-378wtq and on Dynojet dynos the average is roughly 376-466whp and 367-415wtq. And when E85 is/was used, it was roughly 470whp and 415wtq. I understand that there are many, many, variables when comparing numbers but to me it's nice to see just to get a general feel of how the FP Red is stacking up on normal day-to-day EVOs. It was/is nice to see some of you going away from the double pumper route as it was a concern of mine and an expense I wasn't too thrilled to make. There was also talk about upgrading the stock ignition system. Would the HKS ignition upgrade suffice? Thanks.
I am using the HKS DLI, and it works great .


Quick Reply: FP RED dyno results thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM.