763whp/595tq STOCK ECU, SpeedDensity, E85 by TTP!
#106
Evolving Member
iTrader: (68)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats on times and mph Scott!!!, I went to Bradenton but the best i could do was 11.5 costing 2/3 of the way down the track cuz my 5th gear would lock me out completely, so i need an evo 8 3/4th gear which i think my boy Raif back north has one for me over the winter when i go home.
#118
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Van Buren, OH
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car shouldnt be that much lighter. Hence the saying for something being wrong in the weighting department. My car isnt anywhere close to being gutted. Missing the AC in my car is more than made up for by taking all the seats and sway bars out.
I just find it hard to believe that this car weights over 3300 pounds when:
running slicks, light wheels, no sway bars, all seats removed, missing half the exhaust, no spoiler and etc.
Things dont add how you can take weight out and the car still weighs more than it did from the factory. Are all the parts you add heavier than stock? because to me thats the dumbest thing there is.
Im just trying to comprehend how half the interior can be out and the car still weighs that much?
I just find it hard to believe that this car weights over 3300 pounds when:
running slicks, light wheels, no sway bars, all seats removed, missing half the exhaust, no spoiler and etc.
Things dont add how you can take weight out and the car still weighs more than it did from the factory. Are all the parts you add heavier than stock? because to me thats the dumbest thing there is.
Im just trying to comprehend how half the interior can be out and the car still weighs that much?
#119
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
Our dyno, for reference, reads the same as CBRD's. Cars have been dyno'd both places are are close enough to call them the same.
Also for reference I spoke to Mustang Dyno yesterday about your dyno. The numbers that my dyno and CBRD's dyno are spitting out are what they consider normal. Any other comments they made will only turn this into a pissing match.
Since you referred to my dyno again, I came by to put out just those few facts. Beyond that it doesn't matter.
I think we can both admit that I've built more than my share of fast EVO's, as in 9's and quicker. I look at your mod list and I look at your MPH, both simple enough to do. I can get within 25 whp of guessing what any combination I am familar with is going to make generally on OUR dyno, not yours. Based on what it makes here I can tell what an EVO should trap. Doing all of this tell me your car would probably trap right where it did, 143'ish with the mods you have on it, the fuel and such. So good job getting that part of the job done, seriously. On this dyno or CBRD's though the power level would be, at best 600'ish.
I know dyno's are tuning tools and none of us should argue about it. The problem with myself and a ton of other vendors since they are contacting me left and right, is the numbers you are putting out are so over inflated that for an un-informed EVOm member to read them they think you must know something the rest of us don't, I can assure you that's not the case.
That is why the rediculously high numbers are a PITA for everyone, except you and a few others that do the same thing.
Also for reference I spoke to Mustang Dyno yesterday about your dyno. The numbers that my dyno and CBRD's dyno are spitting out are what they consider normal. Any other comments they made will only turn this into a pissing match.
Since you referred to my dyno again, I came by to put out just those few facts. Beyond that it doesn't matter.
I think we can both admit that I've built more than my share of fast EVO's, as in 9's and quicker. I look at your mod list and I look at your MPH, both simple enough to do. I can get within 25 whp of guessing what any combination I am familar with is going to make generally on OUR dyno, not yours. Based on what it makes here I can tell what an EVO should trap. Doing all of this tell me your car would probably trap right where it did, 143'ish with the mods you have on it, the fuel and such. So good job getting that part of the job done, seriously. On this dyno or CBRD's though the power level would be, at best 600'ish.
I know dyno's are tuning tools and none of us should argue about it. The problem with myself and a ton of other vendors since they are contacting me left and right, is the numbers you are putting out are so over inflated that for an un-informed EVOm member to read them they think you must know something the rest of us don't, I can assure you that's not the case.
That is why the rediculously high numbers are a PITA for everyone, except you and a few others that do the same thing.
Last edited by David Buschur; Nov 5, 2009 at 01:40 PM.
#120
That's interesting because I talked to Ed Morgante at MustangDyne and he stated that yours was low reading and ours was calibrated correctly. We walked through the whole diagnostics and he verified the load cell was calibrated perfectly and roller weight was 2152.52lbs.
I would trade you home tracks any day of the year. Boy would we love to test and tune our Evo in 32*F weather with zero humidity. We would surely pick up a few mph easy with a 50*F drop in intake air temperature and density.
Our dyno, for reference, reads the same as CBRD's. Cars have been dyno'd both places are are close enough to call them the same.
Also for reference I spoke to Mustang Dyno yesterday about your dyno. The numbers that my dyno and CBRD's dyno are spitting out are what they consider normal. Any other comments they made will only turn this into a pissing match.
Also for reference I spoke to Mustang Dyno yesterday about your dyno. The numbers that my dyno and CBRD's dyno are spitting out are what they consider normal. Any other comments they made will only turn this into a pissing match.
Last edited by TTP Engineering; Nov 5, 2009 at 01:52 PM.