turbooutlaw1976

iTrader: (2)

Here is the configuration:

06 IX GSR

* Stock IX motor (bone stock)
* Stock cams
* Stock head
* Stock exhaust manifold (no porting)
* 3" Agency Power exhaust - turbo back
* Meghan O2 housing
* Buschur 4" I/C + BR I/C Pipes + Forge BOV
* Tune by "Big Al" - DynoFlash
* Dyno Used - Pruven Performance
* Boost level - 24PSI (IX turbo), 24 PSI (FP Black)
* 880cc Precision Injectors
* 255LPH pump

NOTE: These results compare the stock IX turbo to the FP Black on a healthy stock IX motor @ the same boost level. An Aquamist is being installed and I will post the "high boost" graph.

NOTE: These results are real. I have no reason to post false data. I'm just an everyday Evo owner sharing results.

Here are the results:

-Evo Aaron-

iTrader: (17)

Interesting, good numbers for pump, quite a bit more lag

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Nice, how much boost were these two pulls? Not really alot more lag, different start points on the dyno pull dont help. We have seen 3900 for full boost (seems to not matter how much boost) on the black. The black is only about 200rpm more lag than the Red.

bluebanana23

iTrader: (26)

Thanks for posting the graphs. Too bad it wasn't done on the same day but nice too see another comparison. How come you haven't upgraded cams yet?

turbooutlaw1976

iTrader: (2)

Actually, it was 24 PSI

shuttlegoose

iTrader: (17)

can't see the pics

NitrousOxide

cant see the pic as well!

bbyevo8u

iTrader: (14)

please post the dyno sheet again! why did you take it down?

boostedtres

iTrader: (4)

dyno sheets?

JakeTheVIII

iTrader: (35)

Yea what happened?

red03evo

iTrader: (20)

where's the info?

[I.R.A.]_FBi

no sheet

240Z TwinTurbo

iTrader: (25)

When you make a post that shows someone spent $2,000 for 45hp@wheels that is bad for business

mitdrx

iTrader: (15)

I was just thinking the same thing

CMB

iTrader: (5)

^ you guys are in the dark. That turbo is just getting warmed up at 24 psi.