Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Buschur Racing's first 2.4 L engine build, results inside.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2010, 02:43 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Buschur Racing's first 2.4 L engine build, results inside.

The initial results are finally in.

Here is the build:

2005 EVO8

BR 2.4 liter engine, 9.5:1 compression, billet crank, billet steel rods, forged pistons
Standard head with springs/retainers and just combustion chambers fitted to 2.4
Kelford 272 cams
MAP ported and coated exhaust manifold
FP RED
MAP ported intake manifold
BR 65 mm throttle body
BR 3" turbo back
BR Race FMIC
Stock ECU using Tephra 7
93 octane of some sort
BR manual boost controller

The car, I believe has some poor fuel in it as it is very knock prone and at the end of the dyno session today I dumped a few gallons of race gas in it to see what would happen to the knock counts, they dropped to zero. I am out of time today so Monday we will drain the fuel out and put in some fresh Shell 93 and put it back on the dyno.

The car was tuned, as you will see on the sheet, with a peak boost of 25.2 psi. The car makes 25.2 psi with the FP Red at 4000 rpm and also makes 444 ft lbs of torque at 4000 rpm. Power is excellent but with a better timing map in the car I am sure that even at this boost level the HP and Torque figures will both climb considerably.

I'm happy with the build, even at this level and even if there are no improvements from changing fuel and re-tuning.

Old Jan 7, 2010, 02:46 PM
  #2  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (74)
 
Gary@MellonRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: miami florida
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damm impresive, david buschur do u think this build has a 9.9 in it on race gas ?
Old Jan 7, 2010, 02:50 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
ROGERV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow at only 25psi...Very Nice !!
Old Jan 7, 2010, 02:55 PM
  #4  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
PeteyTurbo@KHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Philly, Jersey
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Force identical scales

Looks good
Old Jan 7, 2010, 02:59 PM
  #5  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
E-SPEC INDUSTRIES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In on the first page for this one!!!
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:04 PM
  #6  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very nice as expected!!!

Mike
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:05 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
dsm25psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte,NC
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAP intake and exhaust manifold???
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:06 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Malvern, PA
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sweet!!!
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:22 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
ch53avitech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dsm25psi
MAP intake and exhaust manifold???
I'm guessing the MAP products were already on the customers car.

The spool rate is really impressive. I'd like to see a FP HTA86 or similar on in there. Someone is going to be a happy customer.
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:26 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
MJ23FE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NJ.201
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very nice results! Is it me or is torque falling hard as hell?

Also something I noticed, why not use ECU controlled boost?

-Jalal
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:49 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
xRoguex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,666
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
The manifolds were already on it before I dropped it off.


We will see what more comes out from the better gas. Either way - this curve AS IS is good for what.. 11.2-11.4 or so.. if I can drive haha.

=)

Originally Posted by MJ23FE
Very nice results! Is it me or is torque falling hard as hell?

Also something I noticed, why not use ECU controlled boost?

-Jalal
I asked David which he wanted to use - I had both his and the GM 3-port on hand.

Last edited by xRoguex; Jan 7, 2010 at 03:57 PM.
Old Jan 7, 2010, 03:50 PM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
ChrisCarey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Awesome results and for lack of a better phrase "mad props" to the Buschur team for getting Will back on the road so quickly!
Old Jan 7, 2010, 04:24 PM
  #13  
Newbie
 
galant306m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice!

Sorry dont post much here, this was posted on my natural forum haha. Will be following this now though and may stop in time to time, to ask a few questions. Finishing up a 2.4 dohc build in my galant atm.

Last edited by galant306m; Jan 7, 2010 at 04:27 PM.
Old Jan 7, 2010, 04:25 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I forgot if you mentioned it somehwere, but what's the rod ratio on this motor?
Old Jan 7, 2010, 04:29 PM
  #15  
Newbie
 
galant306m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they are the same rods as the 4g63's just a different crank and larger pistons.


Quick Reply: Buschur Racing's first 2.4 L engine build, results inside.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:54 AM.