welcome back scott

ill be coming by soon for some more upgrades

great numbers btw

 

The weather correction is disabled. All dynosheets numbers since late 2009 are uncorrected 1.00. Whether reading HP/TQ or HP-WCF/TQ-WCF, they both will read without the barometric sensor and dyno room temperature sensor inputs. They have been disabled on every dynosheet since late last year.

We do not and have not changed any parasitics multipliers, dyno roller weights etc, EVER and never will, period.

With the first 12-18 months of the dyno being run as it came from MD wiht WCF enabled and enough experience and seasons pass with the dyno to see trends in weather and its affect on the WCF, we made a decision to run without allowing the weather station to affect the numbers to make it easier to judge day to day and pull to pull comparisions without a "live" moving correction based on the dyno's built in sensors.

 

Nice numbers, but do I see close to 1000 rpm slower spool? I know that doesn't matter so much to everyone, but it is worth noting that anyone toting the Black as spooling not much later than stock is not being very accurate.

 

boost levels please!!!

 

It says 26 on the final pull

 

 

What was going on at the end of the run to cause that nasty dip in power?

 

thats turbo is breaking all the rules......

 

Nice Red Evo .

It is hard to find them around.

Making good power.

Congrats .

 

As long as the turbo isn't the one that breaks then all is well. Angel is scheduled to come back in to get the springs and retainers that are holding him back installed in the next few days so that should bump the power on top a bit where the stock valves are floating from the weak stock valve springs.

 

It looks more like the pull started 1000RPM later with the Black, so it's not a fair comparison.

I too would like to know just where the full spool is on a Black compared to stock. I'm guessing it's more in the 400-500RPM slower, certainly not 1000RPM slower.

 

Here is the spoolup to 350tq.

Looks like about 674rpms.

 

^^ Cool, thanks for expanding the graph to show where the runs started.

So that's not bad at all for the power made, 674rpms slower spool. I wonder if some FP 4R cams would knock a couple hundred off that too...?