Its so much better than 1.0.0.3 but with change comes bugs. Im trying to zap all of them ... but its taking a little while longer than I planned. Keep the faith.

 

not tuned....

 

pretty cool, now you have a baseline to compare against when you get tuned

 

I remember asking you about this a few months back and was shot down.I have also never noticed this being enforced, is this a new rule now? I think it's great but would be nice to see ALL of the data that adds to the equation.

 

Basically the day I started seeing VDR chart show up in the dyno section, the rules changed in the sticky to say what dyno type and setting was used. So its basically been a rule since day one with VDR. Nothing was ever said prior though regarding DLL.


ANYWAYS..... The new 1.0.0.4 will have ALL the data on the chart. EVERYTHING, total weight used, CF used, smoothing used, gear used and tire size used, type of car ie gearing used, etc.

There will be total transparency .

 

Oh, I totally forgot about DLL lol.. In my field of work, seeing any form of simulation gives me the heebee-jeebee's Although I had showed a VDR plot to one of my buddies from Mustang and he thought it was pretty cool.

 

no, that all started with DLL and TTP complaining to get it blocked. The irony in that is that he was told by every Mustang dyno owner on the forum that his numbers were crazy inflated.

 

$60,000-125,000.00 real dynamometers should not be compared to virtual programs that are a simulation of a real tuning tool.

Our numbers have always read exactly the same as any other MD owners. A year or so ago we were displaying WCF sheets as that is the default of the dyno. Uncorrected and WCF are both recorded and able to be displayed on any dynosheet. We haven't used a WCF dynosheet since last year. All of our current dynosheets are measured at 1.00 correction (even our own streetcar in our signature) which should equate to 6-15% lower than a Dynojet.

 

i made lower than expected but here it is

 

no two dyno's should be compared directly. Your 60,000-125,000 dynamometers is trying to simulate the street where this program is getting the data from. And the bottom line is you were posting the wrong number for a year thinking you were breaking records

 

The data is not coming from the street. It is coming from the datalogger from the output of the ecu which based on laptop speed and data transfer rate can dictate the numbers.

We did not think we broke any records, we did and did so without blowing our engine up like we have seen so many others do.

 

ok

 

This cars making way under power. I just did a friends evo 8 with evo 8 turbo, fmic, cams, mr bov crushed, intake, exhaust, clutch, walbro, etc

did over 400/360 on this program at 20psi spike to 26. 95ron? **** gas with only 13* uptop and 7* at peak.. australia. it is cold there tho right now.

 

yeah, Patric and I spoke on the phone yesterday, he's going to give me a shot at tuning it this time and see if I can find the missing power. He's just waiting on some tuning related goodies to show up from us so he can do a remote tune.

 

lol good i was hoping he would get the hint lol. youll have him ripping in no time when is your motor going back in car man? been a very long time now.. arent you going nuts? or do you just use the 3000gt etc to take your mind off the evo?