Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

big numbers on a stock 9 turbo on e85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2011 | 11:06 PM
  #1  
tscompusa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
big numbers on a stock 9 turbo on e85

Well I guess i just tuned what we call a freak when they make these kinds of numbers on a stock turbo without doing anything crazy.

Fuel: E85 (tested between 85-87%)
ECU: Stock ECU + Speed density /w omni4bar & fuel temp & ECU boost control
Location: California
Tuning Method: Remote Tuned
Mod list:

06' Evo 9 SE
Mil.Spec ported OEM turbo manifold w/Swain White Lightening coating
PPI ported OEM 10.5 hotside w/Swain White Lightening coating
Stock ported 9 turbo with FP 84mm compressor cover
Forced Performance 25 psi wastegate actuator
Cosworth 272 M2 cams
Fidanza adjustable exhaust cam gear
SuperTech dual valve springs and titanium retainers
ARP head studs
AMS fuel rail
PTE 1000cc injectors
Walbro 255
AMS 3" TBE
Invidia 02 housing
Buschur Racing 84mm intake pipe powder-coated in wrinkle black
Nisei fmic intercooler
Nisei lower and upper intercooler piping
Tial Q BOV
AMS Koyo half-size radiator w/slim fan
Grimmspeed 3 port (ECU Boost controlled)


First pull of the night with timing & fuel where we left off prior:



Final results after 10 or so more pulls completed:



And one more to back it up:


Last edited by tscompusa; Sep 16, 2011 at 11:12 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2011 | 11:08 PM
  #2  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Thanks for all your hard work Tom! You have busted your a$$ on this tune and my wife and I really appreciate it! More props to come!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 06:20 AM
  #3  
awd2gen's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 466
Likes: 1
From: Frederick, MD
Tom knows his S*it. nice power man!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 06:40 AM
  #4  
1UpMoto's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 4
From: 305
Nice, what kind of timing are you running up top?
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 06:56 AM
  #5  
JorgeYaHeard's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor, WA
Holy Torque! 400lb.ft. by 4000rpm that must be fun to drive!
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 07:52 AM
  #6  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
That curve looks like *** especially with that big hp spike mid way. Increase smoothing. Its not making as much power like its suggesting.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 08:59 AM
  #7  
S13 Curtis's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Orlando,FL
Originally Posted by project_skyline
That curve looks like *** especially with that big hp spike mid way. Increase smoothing. Its not making as much power like its suggesting.
Damn dude your never happy lol.

It still made good power.

I wonder if that FP Compressor housing mad a big difference.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 09:33 AM
  #8  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
Originally Posted by S13 Curtis
Damn dude your never happy lol.

It still made good power.

I wonder if that FP Compressor housing mad a big difference.

It for sure does on 92/93 pump, but overall it should even on E85.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 10:29 AM
  #9  
TheBoz's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Numbers are looking good. with those numbers you should be a high 11 at the track, and even faster with an awesome driver. There seem to be a lot of stock turbo cars poping up on e85 these days.

lets get a video of that FP FAP. Everyone with a stock turbo wants to hear that thing . I have my anti surge cover in the garage right now, I just have to build an intake for it.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #10  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
Originally Posted by TheBoz
Numbers are looking good. with those numbers you should be a high 11 at the track, and even faster with an awesome driver. There seem to be a lot of stock turbo cars poping up on e85 these days.

lets get a video of that FP FAP. Everyone with a stock turbo wants to hear that thing . I have my anti surge cover in the garage right now, I just have to build an intake for it.

It sounds close to the other FP turbos except not as loud and transformer sounding like
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 11:06 AM
  #11  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Sorry guys no vids for now. Tried launching her last night and the stock clutch is done. So, she will sit till a new clutch is installed. She is pulling hard as fawk though for a stock turbo. I'd guarantee mid to low 11s. About 3 years ago I ran a 7.8 @ 90 in the 1/8 mile with a crappy 1.8 60', ****ty track, and a whopping ~330hp.

Last edited by 1QYK9; Sep 17, 2011 at 11:10 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 11:09 AM
  #12  
4xforce's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: norcal
FWIW my car has basically the same mods minus the FP housing and cams and it made in the 440's with minimal smoothing using VD tuned on e85. Higher smoothing produced a normal looking curve and 428hp. I don't see what smoothing is being used in these graphs but I would think if I had cams I could have seen about 20 more ponies which would be right about where the OP is. So it seems reasonable.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #13  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by project_skyline
That curve looks like *** especially with that big hp spike mid way. Increase smoothing. Its not making as much power like its suggesting.
Thanks for your constructive feedback! Remember the pulls were done on the street, not a dyno, and as much as we tried to find the smoothest road possible it wasn't perfect. Any bumps in the dyno plot are a direct result of the road and nothing else.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 11:20 AM
  #14  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 4xforce
FWIW my car has basically the same mods minus the FP housing and cams and it made in the 440's with minimal smoothing using VD tuned on e85. Higher smoothing produced a normal looking curve and 428hp. I don't see what smoothing is being used in these graphs but I would think if I had cams I could have seen about 20 more ponies which would be right about where the OP is. So it seems reasonable.
Smoothing was 3.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #15  
1UpMoto's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 398
Likes: 4
From: 305
Do you have any before graphs from when you didnt have the FP cover? I am making a little less power with a similar setup, But I didnt get to finish tuning it due to my clutch taking a crap on me.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:52 PM.