tscomptuned - fp black - STOCK BLOCK - virtual dyno vs dynojet / take two - 600whp+ - EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community



Evo Dyno Tuning and Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

tscomptuned - fp black - STOCK BLOCK - virtual dyno vs dynojet / take two - 600whp+

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 4, 2012, 02:35 PM   #1
Silver Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,287
Thanked 44 Times in 38 Posts

Drives: 2004 Evo 8, 2006 Evo IX, 2009 GT-R

tscomptuned - fp black - STOCK BLOCK - virtual dyno vs dynojet / take two - 600whp+

So I made a thread about this car a few weeks ago with virtual dyno showing 570 in 80f temps and then 600whp in cooler temps.. I also said i was going to get the owner on a dynojet for a comparison as well and we did just that.

Below are virtual dyno vs dynojet results.. in Standard, Uncorrected and SAE. The car is from FL so heat is definitely an issue yet it still managed to crack well into the 600whp territory.

Mods are the same as before:

Stock Block & Head
FP Black (JB)
Kelford 272s
Toxic Fab tubular exhaust mani
MAP 3" recirc dump
FP Intake Pipe
BR Filter intake
BR 65mm TB
BR Ported Intake mani
BR Double Pumper
BR Mini Battery kit (A Real One LOL)
BR 3" TBE w/ two Magnaflows (no cat)
Forge RS BOV
Forge MBC
Grimmspeed 3 port
Precision 1200cc Injectors
Spoolin Up COP
ETS 3.8" Garrett core FMIC
ETS 2.5" Upper & Lower Piping
ARP Headstuds
Kiggly HLA pressure reg
ACT Clutch

Boost pressure: 38psi drop to 36psi
Fuel: E85

Please Note: The virtual dyno pull was not done on the same day as the dyno runs, but looks to be very close to the uncorrected / SAE graph on the dynojet. The virtual dyno graph is being shared to show that it is still well within the ball park even though they are not true back to back.. there is a 7-10 day variance here.



smoothing 1 = 613
smoothing 3 = 603
smoothing 5 = 602
smoothing 8 = 599
smoothing 10 = 597

======================

Dynojet results and video:

Uncorrected:



SAE:



Standard:



Unedited Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls3BJGsiaaA
__________________
car #1: TSComp 2.4L BR Vband FF 6466 (10.26 @ 148.14 (3200lb) - E85 37psi)
car #2: 2009 GT-R FBO (10.81 @ 132.19 - 18psi / 93 octane)


- Stock Block/ECU (10.0 @ 146.11)(Scott)
- Quickest & Fastest HX40 Evo (9.73 @ 146.17) (Best MPH 148.95)(Josh)
- Highest TS FP Black 719.78WHP (Tom)
- 3425lb Evo IX 2.0L 6466 (9.86 @ 145.77)(Ronnie)


EcuTek Master Tuner for Nissan GT-R

For Scheduling Remote Tunes please visit: TSCOMPTUNED

Facebook
tom@tscomptuned.net
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 02:44 PM   #2
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: in a basement
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Drives: yougo

FIRST! soooooooooooooooo jealous!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! cant wait to get mine back on the road and tuned. great job as always Tom

Last edited by stinkbomb; May 4, 2012 at 03:14 PM.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 02:45 PM   #3
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Awd_evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FResno, Ca
Posts: 71
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Drives: evo 8-SSL

wow gotta love that stock block, power band looks super great. Gotta be an blast on the street !!!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 02:52 PM   #4
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,365
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts

Drives: 06 Rally Red MR

So out of curiosity what did you revamp to get it to match so close? I spent some time playing with it the other day and was off by 100/100 (on the low side actually) on GotWheelHop's car. I kept getting some weird errors as well so maybe its just I need to update. Not sure but would like to get it that close, especially since I think there are definitely some flat enough roads to get it pretty accurate.

thanks

aaron
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 03:07 PM   #5
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
jonzie04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: MO
Posts: 187
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Drives: 03 evo, 67 camaro

nice job tom!! this guys absolutely insane.... and i love it
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 03:21 PM   #6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
evilempire76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great job. Awesome numbers and once again spot on numbers.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 03:22 PM   #7
Silver Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,287
Thanked 44 Times in 38 Posts

Drives: 2004 Evo 8, 2006 Evo IX, 2009 GT-R

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBradley View Post
So out of curiosity what did you revamp to get it to match so close? I spent some time playing with it the other day and was off by 100/100 (on the low side actually) on GotWheelHop's car. I kept getting some weird errors as well so maybe its just I need to update. Not sure but would like to get it that close, especially since I think there are definitely some flat enough roads to get it pretty accurate.

thanks

aaron
nothing has changed. make sure you use the smooth time and rpm feature in the settings though.
__________________
car #1: TSComp 2.4L BR Vband FF 6466 (10.26 @ 148.14 (3200lb) - E85 37psi)
car #2: 2009 GT-R FBO (10.81 @ 132.19 - 18psi / 93 octane)


- Stock Block/ECU (10.0 @ 146.11)(Scott)
- Quickest & Fastest HX40 Evo (9.73 @ 146.17) (Best MPH 148.95)(Josh)
- Highest TS FP Black 719.78WHP (Tom)
- 3425lb Evo IX 2.0L 6466 (9.86 @ 145.77)(Ronnie)


EcuTek Master Tuner for Nissan GT-R

For Scheduling Remote Tunes please visit: TSCOMPTUNED

Facebook
tom@tscomptuned.net
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 04:09 PM   #8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: KSA
Posts: 570
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Drives: BL GTR 1300hp , white EVO8 881whp+ , Gary EVO8 MR , Lambo Superlaggera , Audi A8 2013 , M Binz S500 AMG kit .

great job man
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 04:46 PM   #9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
prowakeskater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Drives: 2011 R35, tb ix gsr, pb sss x grr (sold), ww viii mr (sold), 09 600rr (stolen), 03 wr450 motard (stolen)

so maybe I am at 430hp after all. haha. Good stuff Tom!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 05:05 PM   #10
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Srt4...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Drives: 2003 RR GSR

Very nice!
Cant wait for my bb fpblack
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 05:44 PM   #11
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
escodotcarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 907
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Drives: 2006 IX SE

not to be that guy but I cant see that lasting at all....thats like a ticking time bomb. I know Tom is a great tuner and all but thats pretty much at the limit on the stock bottom end. Good luck
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 05:58 PM   #12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
wizzo 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 3,794
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Drives: 05 EB SSL Evo, 13 Blue R1, 13 Tahoe ltz (Daily), 95 Nissan pickup lowrider(sold)

I have a built motor with higher compression and I'm not even at this level. I must be doing something wrong.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 06:25 PM   #13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
4g63evoeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany NY
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Drives: 9 rs, 99 Tdi golf, 00 powerstroke

wow, love it.

Tom, great job!
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 06:26 PM   #14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Drives: slow and silver

Quote:
Originally Posted by tscompusa View Post
nothing has changed. make sure you use the smooth time and rpm feature in the settings though.
Tom, continuing from what Aaron posted, are you using the logs from the dyno to plot a VDR, or does it have to be a road pull to have accurate results?

Sick numbers for a stock block though. Keep up the good work, man.
Offline
 
Reply With Quote
Old May 4, 2012, 07:24 PM   #15
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (26)
 
kyoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: US
Posts: 6,517
Thanked 34 Times in 34 Posts

Drives: IX

amazing, and very impressive how close vd is even for those high power levels
Online
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Evo 9 stock block FP Black e85/93 inside + hybrid boost - 570WHP tscompusa Evo Dyno Tuning and Results 85 Jul 29, 2016 06:15 PM
TSComptuned 700WHP+ FP Black dynojet #'s inside tscompusa Evo Dyno Tuning and Results 69 Jul 4, 2015 02:02 AM
TSComptuned - EVO 8 BR 2.0L FF STM Holset HX40 GSC S3 E85 | 701hp | 9.92 @ 144.36 tscompusa Evo Dyno Tuning and Results 79 Aug 28, 2014 01:02 PM
BR 2.3 FP Black GSC S2 Toxicfab mani 93 & E85 (VD vs Real dyno comparo inside also) tscompusa Evo Dyno Tuning and Results 16 Aug 3, 2014 07:34 PM
TSComptuned Evo 9 SE Stock block Map EF3 E85 SD 500WHP+ sean89 Evo Dyno Tuning and Results 17 Sep 27, 2013 11:04 AM


Tags
black, block, custom, dyno, dynojet, evo, fp, map, settig, smoothing, software, stock, timing, tscompusa, virtual

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: