Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

BR 2.3RPM, FP Black and issues.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:55 AM
  #76  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Badass!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:13 AM
  #77  
mchristian's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Yea baby!!!!! Great work DB!!!
Can't wait to get my own little bad bish!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:58 AM
  #78  
whiteEvo08Y's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 624
Likes: 6
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Wow that is pretty Good gain David just by putting the right stuff in the car.
Nice power gain.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 03:49 PM
  #79  
mchristian's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Dave, give me a call. I didn't want to fork out cash on new cams but if you can make me a killer deal, I'd like to see what you have in mind and obviously curious on the hp/tq increases. The results already look ridiculously good!
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 06:32 PM
  #80  
suby2evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 303
Likes: 2
From: south florida
Originally Posted by mchristian
Dave, give me a call. I didn't want to fork out cash on new cams but if you can make me a killer deal, I'd like to see what you have in mind and obviously curious on the hp/tq increases. The results already look ridiculously good!
Some GSC S3's would be AWESOME on this car
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 11:20 AM
  #81  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Yes, race is what we call our 4"core and the BFIC is the 4.5" core. The BFIC is probably best for drag racing/shorter sprints and the 4" is better overall for everything else. The BFIC works great as a huge heat sink but the airflow through the thicker core isn't as good and once it gets heated it takes longer to get the temps back down because of it. Both excellent at cooling, one just cools back off faster.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2012 | 11:43 PM
  #82  
17pstockcar's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
David what is the cost of an exhaust system like you have on this car?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 06:16 AM
  #83  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The exhaust on this car isn't what we typically produce, we were out of tubing and waiting so I had to modify his system. If I sold this though all with our lighter weight tubing, two mufflers and set up for the EVO9 JDM rear it would be $1029 and it is the lightest stainless exhaust you can buy.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 09:44 AM
  #84  
uvambo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
From: Kennewick, WA
Originally Posted by David Buschur
Yes, race is what we call our 4"core and the BFIC is the 4.5" core. The BFIC is probably best for drag racing/shorter sprints and the 4" is better overall for everything else. The BFIC works great as a huge heat sink but the airflow through the thicker core isn't as good and once it gets heated it takes longer to get the temps back down because of it. Both excellent at cooling, one just cools back off faster.
good to know thanks
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2012 | 12:12 PM
  #85  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Nice post, those stock framers sure put out a lot of heat in the higher boost range.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 07:13 AM
  #86  
mchristian's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #87  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Nice video. Shifting looked excellent. What was the 60' time? The MPH should be higher with the WHP it made here, was the boost turned up where it should be?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 11:50 AM
  #88  
mchristian's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
1.99 60ft. Lol
With Dunlop direzza star specs I just spin both 1st and 2nd.
38 psi was what you said I could run. I verified it with the new AEM gauge.

Been so busy at work I haven't figured out how to see logs on the AEM and verify boost with the map sensor like you recommended.

How far off you think the MPH is?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 12:08 PM
  #89  
khmerpimpin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: Clovis, California
Originally Posted by mchristian
1.99 60ft. Lol
With Dunlop direzza star specs I just spin both 1st and 2nd.
38 psi was what you said I could run. I verified it with the new AEM gauge.

Been so busy at work I haven't figured out how to see logs on the AEM and verify boost with the map sensor like you recommended.

How far off you think the MPH is?
And I thought those were suppose to be excellent street tires, im sure with a better launch (60ft) you can dip into the high 10's you certanly have the power for it.. What size are the tires? Maybe try boost by gear to get some more traction down low?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2013 | 01:22 PM
  #90  
mchristian's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
They are 265s. Pretty fat rubber for an Evo. I agree, when originally purchased they were one of the top street/autox tires I could find...however they don't hook at this power level street or strip.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 AM.