Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

FP 71HTA Dyno results 2003 Evo 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2013 | 09:07 PM
  #1  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
FP 71HTA Dyno results 2003 Evo 8

I installed a FP 71HTA with the standard cover and 25psi. wastegate spring into a pretty stock 2003 Evo 8. I also installed an Invidia O2 housing, 3" downpipe, Mil.spec 200 cell cat. converter, FIC 850cc injectors, and a little shove to the spring in the Evo 9 cbv. I gained ~40rwhp with the modifications which I'm fine with. It was tuned at 26-27psi. and ~11.0afr's.



Comparison to the previous dyno tune which was with a HKS catback exhaust and a 3 port boost solenoid that FFTEC installed before tuning the car the first time.
Upgrading the intercooler and pipes would help as would a mild camshaft upgrade. I'm taxing the stock stuff right now at that boost level.
The previous dyno numbers on the following sheet are 258hp 249 ft-lbs though I did make a pull with 262 252 unfortunately it's not compared on this sheet.


Reply
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 12:12 AM
  #2  
bac's Avatar
bac
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: south africa
good comparison, basically just turbo swap rest unchanged, and 40whp power increase. Nicely done, cams should wake that motor up.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2013 | 05:33 PM
  #3  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Hey thanks bac. I liked most that the power curve is more responsive than it was stock. So I got an upgrade that spools about 100 rpm slower than the stock evo 8 turbo that I had previously but flows air more efficiently so power build up happens faster. I really like it.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 06:26 PM
  #4  
RMDZidane's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
I installed an ETS 3.5" intercooler along with a LICP to help keep my car healthy while participating in HPDE's which meant I should get an adjustment to the tune. Here is the dyno:
313 awhp and 305 ft-lb torque which is an improvement of 15-20hp from the initial dyno tune after the 71hta install. I had two dyno runs that put down 320awhp but I didn't bother to print them up because the boost wasn't fully adjusted yet. I'm very comfortable with the power the car makes and the tuner assured me the tune is very safe for what I like to do with the car and thats what I care about

Reply
Old Apr 20, 2013 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
LAN_EVO's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA
just want to make sure but this was done on 91 pump correct? i've been keeping my eye on this turbo because i believe its just what im looking for but its so hard to compare different peoples dyno. I have heard that fftec does read a bit lower than most and since i'm stationed in travis afb which is about an hour north of san fran ill be going there for my mods anyways and i really would like to reach about 350whp+ with this turbo on their dyno. i guess what im asking is how much of a gain do you think it would get if you added say gsc s2 cams, 84mm cover, proper fuel mods and upped the boost
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2013 | 05:29 AM
  #6  
ToddRhodes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 3
From: South Bend, IN
Originally Posted by LAN_EVO
just want to make sure but this was done on 91 pump correct? i've been keeping my eye on this turbo because i believe its just what im looking for but its so hard to compare different peoples dyno. I have heard that fftec does read a bit lower than most and since i'm stationed in travis afb which is about an hour north of san fran ill be going there for my mods anyways and i really would like to reach about 350whp+ with this turbo on their dyno. i guess what im asking is how much of a gain do you think it would get if you added say gsc s2 cams, 84mm cover, proper fuel mods and upped the boost
I haven't re-run my setup through VD yet (it's all I have access to) but I have exactly the setup you just described plus some odds and ends and an S1 intake came instead of an S2. Stock IM/TB. VD showed 405 awhp if memory serves on 26 psi last fall. 93 octane gas. I was at 380 prior to the cams, and was about 348 before that with the only mods added being the 71HTA, ported O2 housing, and ported exhaust manifold. It's a *fantastic* turbo IMO. Spools as quickly as stock and is good for 15-20% more power (or at least the potential to do so).
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2013 | 07:26 AM
  #7  
LAN_EVO's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by ToddRhodes
I haven't re-run my setup through VD yet (it's all I have access to) but I have exactly the setup you just described plus some odds and ends and an S1 intake came instead of an S2. Stock IM/TB. VD showed 405 awhp if memory serves on 26 psi last fall. 93 octane gas. I was at 380 prior to the cams, and was about 348 before that with the only mods added being the 71HTA, ported O2 housing, and ported exhaust manifold. It's a *fantastic* turbo IMO. Spools as quickly as stock and is good for 15-20% more power (or at least the potential to do so).
The biggest difference I see between your set-up and the one im shooting for is mainly 91 vs 93 I hate being in cali because no 93 and the closest e85 is about 15-20 miles out of my way so would like to stay on pump.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
50
Apr 17, 2017 11:47 AM
DfunctionEvo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
15
Feb 13, 2017 07:20 AM
ReaperX
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
36
Feb 16, 2016 05:38 PM
AWD Motorsports
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
49
Feb 2, 2012 10:32 AM
supersnow
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
5
Dec 19, 2011 05:32 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:11 AM.