Do you have an FP Turbo?
Here is my 2005 Evo 8 back when AWD Motorsports did my BR2.4LR with an FP Black. First is the 93 oct map the 2nd is my Q16 map
93 OCT
Q16
I have a newer set up now.Thats in my sig. Working on getting a new bottom end that is why you don't see one in my sig.
93 OCT
Q16
I have a newer set up now.Thats in my sig. Working on getting a new bottom end that is why you don't see one in my sig.
Last edited by FL_SilverEvo8; Apr 6, 2013 at 05:25 AM.
Yes, your reaction to not being able to use virtual dyno numbers. Thanks. 
EDIT> Let me clarify so I don't sound like a complete jerk - I'm not laughing AT you, I'm laughing along with many others who have similar thoughts on VD numbers. I'm not singling you out.
EDIT> Let me clarify so I don't sound like a complete jerk - I'm not laughing AT you, I'm laughing along with many others who have similar thoughts on VD numbers. I'm not singling you out.
Last edited by Craig King; Apr 6, 2013 at 06:28 PM.
Evolved Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
I'm pretty sure you're the only one laughing about it...But from what I get from your reaction is VD numbers are complete bull**** and all the reputable tuners/shops that use VD are a joke as well...hmmm
vd can be great as a tunning tool, but some people can not stand when people throw numbers around that are rarely backed up
I made 630whp on VD, i went 134.6 mph in the 1/4 with all season's shifting into 5th gear. That sounds pretty spot on MPH to WHP. Id be willing to bet im making 615-630whp on a dynojet.
its now on the car, makes about 500HP but sorry, dont have any graphs
Newbie
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Hta3582. My car was right around 610whp at the time. I could really use a new key chain. Mine's falling apart....
Evo IX 9.96@139.83mph STOCK BLOCK DAILY DRIVEN STREET CAR!!! - YouTube
Evo IX 9.96@139.83mph STOCK BLOCK DAILY DRIVEN STREET CAR!!! - YouTube
Last edited by itsmrrizz2you; Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM.
with all due respect, this is a prime example of vd numbers being waaaaayyyyy off, and the only reason why you trapped 133 on that 11.0 run was because your et was so slow. better 60 along with faster shifting would have brought your et down and your mph as well. check out the dyno vs track results in the drag racing section and see how your numbers compare. not trying to be a dick, I just hate seeing these big numbers and little results, unless your car weighs like 3800lbs I just don't see it. sorry for the off topic
with all due respect, this is a prime example of vd numbers being waaaaayyyyy off, and the only reason why you trapped 133 on that 11.0 run was because your et was so slow. better 60 along with faster shifting would have brought your et down and your mph as well. check out the dyno vs track results in the drag racing section and see how your numbers compare. not trying to be a dick, I just hate seeing these big numbers and little results, unless your car weighs like 3800lbs I just don't see it. sorry for the off topic
you cant really shift any faster then this: