Comparing the 5 speed EVO trans to the 6 speed MR trans
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I agree that double clutching and rev matching can make downshifting to first smoother and without grinding, but only for like parking situations - something around 10mph or less. To me, that is what the three synchros are for, so your 30K car doesn't grind and balk when just trying to manuever between speed bumps at the local strip mall. But, autocross is a different story - its the whole competition versus daily use compromise thing. Maybe you guys should look into getting dog cut cears and forgoing synchros all together. Would that help with downshifting easier, at the expense of daily comfort?
i wish i could get all these MT noobs in the room to understand 2 factual concepts that should never be done.
those are:
1. never double clutch a car that has a synchronized transmission like i just said
2. 1st gear is only used for one purpose; for the purpose of moving from a complete stop
Originally Posted by JF1GD2
FYI, you dont double clutch a car that has synchronizers. that's a trick suited for cars without them, i.e. 60's british sports cars.
i wish i could get all these MT noobs in the room to understand 2 factual concepts that should never be done.
those are:
1. never double clutch a car that has a synchronized transmission like i just said
2. 1st gear is only used for one purpose; for the purpose of moving from a complete stop
i wish i could get all these MT noobs in the room to understand 2 factual concepts that should never be done.
those are:
1. never double clutch a car that has a synchronized transmission like i just said
2. 1st gear is only used for one purpose; for the purpose of moving from a complete stop
BTW I am not a MT n00b
Ben
go e-mail subaru.com, or read theor publication DRIVE magazine and theyll tell you the same thing I said in number 1.
it is difficult to do yes, but regardless of what car you drive, even if another downshifts to 1st easily, you never do it!
it is difficult to do yes, but regardless of what car you drive, even if another downshifts to 1st easily, you never do it!
Originally Posted by JF1GD2
2. 1st gear is only used for one purpose; for the purpose of moving from a complete stop
Originally Posted by gtr
Perhaps on a subbie 5-speed. They don't use triple synchronizer for their health.
what do you expect on an inexpensive performance car? leather, heated seats and navigation too???
it has single synch on 1st, double on 2-5. you're still missing the point, a manual transmission was never designed to be shifted into first while moving, rolling, or being at anything but a complete stop
you can only budget so much into any car in regards to the synchronizers. hell if you want 6 gears in an evo you have to pay another $3,500-5,000. you can only give so much until you're no longer making a profit.
every car has it's demons, too. EVO's eat up clutches and transfer cases, does that make it a less desirable car? despite that, for $29,000 it's still a great performer and a great value, just like the WRX is a great value for $22,000 (bought mine for 21,800 new)
Originally Posted by JF1GD2
FYI, you dont double clutch a car that has synchronizers. that's a trick suited for cars without them, i.e. 60's british sports cars.
Originally Posted by Theibault
Why would the number of gears make a difference in strength limits?
Originally Posted by MR-SilverEVO8
You gotta get more parts in the same available space.... Thus the parts get smaller, less material, less strenght, more fragile..... Still, the 6 speed tranny in the EVO should be plenty strong enough for the car as it is designed for it.
Originally Posted by Eric Lyublinsky
I have driven the 6spd MR and I love the MR but the 6gears are just not need over the 5spd. Just another shift witch is not really useful on the street it might be on the track but on the street 5spd it ****.
IMHO
ERIC
IMHO
ERIC



