New Bolt in turbo... FP White Rabbit.
Originally Posted by Imyurturboluva
The SEARCH option always works.


Originally Posted by 954DRGSR
Then there wouldn't be any dyno A vs dyno B debates. We could just see the difference gained by the addition of the turbo.
Last edited by 954DRGSR; Jun 15, 2005 at 05:22 PM.
No surging whatsoever under any condition. This turbo has been on our "family" Evo daily driver for almost 8500 miles for durability testing. During this time, my wife has driven this car to work and back every day that I haven't kidnapped it for testing. LOL. With the boost set at 18psi, she could not tell a difference between it and the Rabbit. Driveability is virtually the same as stock.
Our Dynojet wasn't in place at the time we changed out the turbos, so I do not have a stock turbo figure for you guys on the same car. I will see what I can do about finding a similar vehicle to test for a benchmark, but honestly, there has been so many pulls done on stock turbos that it's not my highest priority. I personally feel there are plenty of comparable AWD dynojet numbers out there.
The temperature in the dyno bay was 87 degrees today during testing. All pulls were done back to back with the only rest occuring during the draining of the tank and dumping in the racegas... which was done without unstrapping the car. These results should represent real-world attainable numbers for those qualified to produce the results.
I will try to keep your questions answered in a timely fashion. I'm not a big forum poster, so I'll try to make additional time to keep you informed.
Take care.
Our Dynojet wasn't in place at the time we changed out the turbos, so I do not have a stock turbo figure for you guys on the same car. I will see what I can do about finding a similar vehicle to test for a benchmark, but honestly, there has been so many pulls done on stock turbos that it's not my highest priority. I personally feel there are plenty of comparable AWD dynojet numbers out there.
The temperature in the dyno bay was 87 degrees today during testing. All pulls were done back to back with the only rest occuring during the draining of the tank and dumping in the racegas... which was done without unstrapping the car. These results should represent real-world attainable numbers for those qualified to produce the results.
I will try to keep your questions answered in a timely fashion. I'm not a big forum poster, so I'll try to make additional time to keep you informed.
Take care.
Originally Posted by Az3ar
You seem to have great spool on this turbo but in most cases stock turbo have hit 270~280WHP @ 4K RPM where this one hit 250 (NOT bad at all)
Originally Posted by platinumspecv
im ordering mine TODAY. Imagine this setup with alkey!!!!!!!!!!
I knew it was going to be good.
Tym,
I will have every basic bolt-on with this turbo (however no cams or cam gears). Will I need a fuel pump and/or new injectors (mods-intercooler, intercooler piping, XEDE, TBE)?
I will have every basic bolt-on with this turbo (however no cams or cam gears). Will I need a fuel pump and/or new injectors (mods-intercooler, intercooler piping, XEDE, TBE)?
Originally Posted by Tym Switzer
No surging whatsoever under any condition. This turbo has been on our "family" Evo daily driver for almost 8500 miles for durability testing. During this time, my wife has driven this car to work and back every day that I haven't kidnapped it for testing. LOL. With the boost set at 18psi, she could not tell a difference between it and the Rabbit. Driveability is virtually the same as stock.
Our Dynojet wasn't in place at the time we changed out the turbos, so I do not have a stock turbo figure for you guys on the same car. I will see what I can do about finding a similar vehicle to test for a benchmark, but honestly, there has been so many pulls done on stock turbos that it's not my highest priority. I personally feel there are plenty of comparable AWD dynojet numbers out there.
The temperature in the dyno bay was 87 degrees today during testing. All pulls were done back to back with the only rest occuring during the draining of the tank and dumping in the racegas... which was done without unstrapping the car. These results should represent real-world attainable numbers for those qualified to produce the results.
I will try to keep your questions answered in a timely fashion. I'm not a big forum poster, so I'll try to make additional time to keep you informed.
Take care.
Our Dynojet wasn't in place at the time we changed out the turbos, so I do not have a stock turbo figure for you guys on the same car. I will see what I can do about finding a similar vehicle to test for a benchmark, but honestly, there has been so many pulls done on stock turbos that it's not my highest priority. I personally feel there are plenty of comparable AWD dynojet numbers out there.
The temperature in the dyno bay was 87 degrees today during testing. All pulls were done back to back with the only rest occuring during the draining of the tank and dumping in the racegas... which was done without unstrapping the car. These results should represent real-world attainable numbers for those qualified to produce the results.
I will try to keep your questions answered in a timely fashion. I'm not a big forum poster, so I'll try to make additional time to keep you informed.
Take care.
I have the Dyno video of the cars run for you guys! Follow the "White rabbit"...........
http://www.switzerperformanceinnovat...ideo/video.htm
Right click and "Save as" to get the video to work fellas.
Last edited by evolvedmb; Jun 15, 2005 at 05:41 PM.
Daaayum!!! Those are some sick #s for stock cams! I can only imagine how much better they would be w/ some aftermarket cams. Another quality high performing product from FP. Rock on guys!
hehe.. I was constantly amazed back in my DSM days when people were posting up good #s w/ the FP Green and Red turbos. This turbo just continues that trend. No hype needed. The numbers speak for themselves.
Im liking those numbers however, like someone said, I am skeptical because of the use of AEM EMS.
Id say 90% of the guys that would buy this turbo will have reflashes, Im one of them. I dont knwo who said it but 20-30whp with EMS over reflash is way too optimistic IMO. I made 346whp on basically BR Stage 3 mods on 93. I dont see too many standalone guys on pump doing 365+whp (my mods + EMS), and if they do have those numbers, they have a bunch of other mods to go along with it. However, I will say the EMS is good for another solid 10-15whp.
Given that, 355+whp on pump with stock cams is quite impressive... I think cams could easily put that up to 380+whp. All Im looking for is 380+whp. 380 would make me very happy!!!!!!!!
Either way, Im glad to see some positive results, however, Im waiting for some dynojet runs with reflashes to see how it performs. If I see something impressive, FP is getting my dollar.... fifteen hundred and fifty of them to be exact.
BTW - is it safe to assume injectors will be needed with this turbo to run it even on pump gas?
Tom
Id say 90% of the guys that would buy this turbo will have reflashes, Im one of them. I dont knwo who said it but 20-30whp with EMS over reflash is way too optimistic IMO. I made 346whp on basically BR Stage 3 mods on 93. I dont see too many standalone guys on pump doing 365+whp (my mods + EMS), and if they do have those numbers, they have a bunch of other mods to go along with it. However, I will say the EMS is good for another solid 10-15whp.
Given that, 355+whp on pump with stock cams is quite impressive... I think cams could easily put that up to 380+whp. All Im looking for is 380+whp. 380 would make me very happy!!!!!!!!
Either way, Im glad to see some positive results, however, Im waiting for some dynojet runs with reflashes to see how it performs. If I see something impressive, FP is getting my dollar.... fifteen hundred and fifty of them to be exact.
BTW - is it safe to assume injectors will be needed with this turbo to run it even on pump gas?
Tom
Last edited by Soon2BEVO; Jun 15, 2005 at 06:43 PM.


