Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.
View Poll Results: Do You believe it?
YEs
75
26.22%
No
211
73.78%
Voters: 286. You may not vote on this poll

469AWHP on STOCK TURBO!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:27 AM
  #211  
dsm95hybrid's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I agree, he is right. But when people come on here and boast about numbers on their dyno, it changes the whole deal. All they need to do is say how much they gained from last time, but no, they do like marksevo and say,

"I dyno'd 335whp!! That's equivalent to 388whp on a Dynojyet, yay!!!"
Then he stated "well at least 360whp DJ and according to Buschur's dynojet for stage III mods, David Buschur indicates 361whp.

Sorry, but now we're supposed to believe he's making all that power on 93oct with basic bolt-ons, right? All that really mattered is that he went from his baseline of 279 to his new reading of 335 (although only 272tq for some very strange reason), which is very significant, since it included switching from one flash to another.
You are mixing up two different people.
Mark and Manie are two different people. Mark got 264's and his first flash. Manie HAD 264/272's and replaced another flash.

292whp to 332whp is Marks.

279whp to 335whp is Manie's

Get your facts straight assface.

Would you have me believe that a regular bolt-on Evo w/FMIC is going to make more power on a MD than a regular bolt-on Evo PLUS WHITE RABBIT on a Dynojet when both are on 93 oct? Since the WR Evo dyno'd 328 this weekend right after trapping 112 (perfect correlation to whp), that would mean the 335whp MD car would be able to trap 115-116 on pump gas. I'd _love_ to see it...
How does 328whp= 112mph
and 332whp= 115-116mph.

You are an exaggerative moron. Maybe another 4whp for me will add 4mph to my 115.51mph?

You spend all this time trying to discredit others facts. Take a look at your own.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:28 AM
  #212  
dsm95hybrid's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
And to put this dyno setting crap to bed, here is an email from Mustang.

"The company Mustang buys the vehicle look-up tables from recently came out with information for vehicles up to I believe 2004. As for the Evo, 3300lb and 13.0 HP @ 50 would be fine. As long as the weight is within a couple hundred lbs of what it really is, the load on the car isn't going to be that substantially different. As for the HP @ 50, 13.0 is about average for all cars and again isn't going to affect the loading on the vehicle that much.

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.

Thanks,
Tim @ Mustang
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:56 AM
  #213  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by dsm95hybrid
How does 328whp= 112mph
and 332whp= 115-116mph.
You are an exaggerative moron. Maybe another 4whp for me will add 4mph to my 115.51mph?

You spend all this time trying to discredit others facts. Take a look at your own.
Wow, I didn't think I'd have to explain this one to you, but I guess I was wrong:

That 328whp is on a DYNOJET, therefore 112mph.

That 332whp is on a MUSTANG DYNO, therefore 115-116mph.

Duh. You're smarter than that, Scott. The whole point of this argument was that his 332whp was more of a Dynojet reading than a true Mustang Dyno reading. You have been trying to convince me that it's a true Mustang Dyno reading, which means his car really dynos around 360+ on a Dynojet WITH PUMP GAS AND NO ALKY. Hah, what a joke.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 08:16 AM
  #214  
dsm95hybrid's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
The whole point of this argument was that his 332whp was more of a Dynojet reading than a true Mustang Dyno reading. You have been trying to convince me that it's a true Mustang Dyno reading, which means his car really dynos around 360+ on a Dynojet WITH PUMP GAS AND NO ALKY. Hah, what a joke.
http://www.buschurracing.com/EVO_Stage3.html

Tell it to Dave Buschur. I don't consider him a joke...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #215  
Speedlimit's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 101
From: NR Reading PA
I just read 4 pages of this and I'm not sure what the heck is the argument. The only dyno numbers that can be compared are same dyno - same day - same car and the differences (plus/minus) after mods and or tuning. That is it! Any other comparison is useless.

Also, we are tired of getting reported posts for abusive and abrasive language. Those of you who cannot discuss and argue without name calling will be ask to leave. Clean it up or we will.

Speedlimit...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:32 PM
  #216  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by dsm95hybrid
http://www.buschurracing.com/EVO_Stage3.html

Tell it to Dave Buschur. I don't consider him a joke...
Nice 2-wheel dyno with 60 less tq than hp...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
99evoVI
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
0
Feb 1, 2016 04:53 AM
99evoVI
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Sep 10, 2015 03:57 AM
ApacheToYaDome
ECU Flash
14
Jun 6, 2013 04:48 AM
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
51
Jan 5, 2011 07:39 PM
Mellon Racing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
66
Mar 2, 2010 01:59 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 PM.