Where is the price at i didnt see it on the website/or in this thread ?

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Widebandphillip

Calibrations are always in question. They could have calibrated it to show a lower number. This is why i hate dyno numbers.

What do you know? A DynoDynamics Dyno is much more accurate and reliable dyno produced. It will make the same numbers back to back no matter what the conditions are. DD dyno's are know for reading lower than other dyno's such as DynoJets. However, I would much rather be tuned on a DD dyno than a Dynojet due to the fact that results can be seen in real time. You have to wait for a run to complete to see results on a dynojet. There's no way of telling if an event is occurring with the Dynojet during a run until it is over.

 

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...=129954&page=1

3071 with a cat on 91

356 whp

WBP for you that's 357 at the crank

 

Sorry to go OT, but I wonder if one of the Vishnu guys could estimate what hp the BJ's mani adds. Any experience with a Magnus? How do they compare?

 

Reading that thread iirc the consensus was that most of the power (26 hp diff between this 3071 and David's (264/272?) at 330whp ) was attributable to the 280 cams.

I think the jury is out on intake manifolds, but I'm no expert.

 

Shows what you know. Dynodynamics puts out accurate numbers and dynojets read HIGHER. Plus i don't even like dyno dynamics. Dynapack forever. Do you even know why getting a reading realtime is even useful?

 

80/200 You never did answer my question. Math anyone?

 

Are you saying that Dyno Dynamics dynos don't give realtime data?

 

Where did i say it didn't?

 

When we ran the BJ manifold with the GT35R, the gains weren't very big. I don't recall seeing more than 10whp at the top end compared to the stock manifold. I also recalling loosing a bit of power down low. This was went the car was putting down close to 500whp on our dyno (approx 600whp on an AWD Dynoject). But, then again, we really didn't do any careful a/b/a testing with the manifold so these conclusions should be taken with a grain of salt.

Shiv

 

If you re-read your post, you wrote that you liked dynapacks because they give realtime data. I got the feeling that you suggested that the other dyno's don't offer that feature. If i was wrong, pardon me.

Shiv

 

IC, yea i was just referring to event horizon's post about dyno dynamics.

 

Thanks Shiv, rr

 

Since you stuck your nose in my thread talking about our turbo kit I will take the liberty to just come in here once and say, "That is the absolute biggest joke of an idea I have ever seen. Not only does the design stink it is apparently made of fairly thin wall tubing and it is going to break."

With the release of this contraption you call an adapter I now see why you wanted to just pop into our thread about our turbo kits a few weeks ago and place doubt about how our wastegate was positioned.

Shiv, you are a real piece of work.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com

 

Wait, who the hell do you think you are coming in here taking ****. Where in here does it have ANYTHING to do with your turbo kit? Yeah, its great and all that you sponsor these forums, but get a life. Also, the adaptors are cast, not tube.

I'm really getting sick of this whole tuner thing. It’s just plain ridiculous. We all drive the same damn car, but we act like each other's tuner is either Ford or Chevy. It’s just stupid. Look, if you want this to stop the tuners need to step up to the plate and stop acting like teens in high school. All the BS bickering back in forth is just old. David, if Shiv said something to you, why can't you just take it like a man, put up some facts to back up YOUR claim, and not bring the name calling and childish behavior into it. Let the other tuners trash their rep themselves. People do have eyes, and can read.

This type of behavior should not be coming from someone that sponsors the forums. You have to set an example for the others.