Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

20G turbo upgrade from Buschur Racing.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 05:21 AM
  #826  
DragNRacing's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 1
From: WI
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya he said him self some post befor dont remeber were. he said everything he has from up to stage 4, which does not inclue head work, or pistions and what not like that. so if his car has that its misleading, corret me if im wrong.
David does have head work, a built motor, and a lighter car. However I do not and am still getting nearly the same results from the 20G-9-5 with a 6spd that sucks for drag. I do have their full stage 4 with the Revolver cams. My entire mod list is in my signature under the "Buschur Signature Stage" link but a built head and motor are definitely not necessary.

Last edited by DragNRacing; Apr 27, 2006 at 05:25 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 05:33 AM
  #827  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
I think I may have to check these revolver cams out.. you're trapping around 3mph faster than I was in the 1/8th before my 6blade crapped out.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:14 AM
  #828  
mike1023's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 1
From: NY
Originally Posted by DragNRacing
David does have head work, a built motor, and a lighter car. However I do not and am still getting nearly the same results from the 20G-9-5 with a 6spd that sucks for drag. I do have their full stage 4 with the Revolver cams. My entire mod list is in my signature under the "Buschur Signature Stage" link but a built head and motor are definitely not necessary.

ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:17 AM
  #829  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
Originally Posted by justchil
I think I may have to check these revolver cams out.. you're trapping around 3mph faster than I was in the 1/8th before my 6blade crapped out.
The only way you can run the revolvers are the jun 272'a is if you have a standalone....
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #830  
justchil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Yeah I know that's the only thing keeping me from getting them. I'm just running HKS 264's right now. Not work 2-3k to upgrade cams right now

Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. I haven't seen to many stock turbos trapping 120+ but that could be ignorance on my part. I'd like to trap 150mph on my 20G but lets be realistic here.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:33 AM
  #831  
fsugatorbait's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
Please take the time to form complete sentances. I read better english in my alphabet cereal this morning.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:38 AM
  #832  
Brian's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Internets
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.

Yeah shave off some weight, standalone, built motor all around better setup and VPC16. I would expect it to do better.


You want big, go big.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:45 AM
  #833  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
I wish there was an "easy" was around emmisions testing with the aem. I know it can be done if you convert back to the stock ecu.....but I dont want to mess what all of that bs
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 06:47 AM
  #834  
kmcconn9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 3
From: Hagerstown
I think this turbo is the ultimate street setup...

I am going to get either the 20g-9-5 or go with the turbo dave said should be out by the end of the year for this car...

Then go big on my second evo which will be a evo 9 rs...in about 2 years
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:03 AM
  #835  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by kmcconn9
The only way you can run the revolvers are the jun 272'a is if you have a standalone....
On the Buschur forum, Al said he can get nearly any cams to idle with the OEM rubber MAF pipe.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #836  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
I have said this once already in the thread, u see the numbers that the 20g-9-5 is putting out. aparently u want some 500hp beast, sorry to break the news to u but the 20g isnt going to cut it. u will need at least a 35r. so do me a favor, stop the ranting about " o i have seen this and that " because i really dont think any of us here care.
Originally Posted by mike1023
ya your traping 120 on a 20g not good if i had i would want to trap at 124 if not better. 11.3 would want that 11 ot 11.9. so i think good luck, i seen stock turbo do bette then that still.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:19 AM
  #837  
RSGuy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
I would think that 430whp Dyno-Jet would be possible with the 20G-9 on race gas with the required supporting mods, possible standalone, and good tuning. That would be right around 500hp at the crank. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 500 crank horsepower doesnt seem that out of reach with the 20G-9....
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:41 AM
  #838  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
very true. but your not getting any more hp from th turbo at that point.
Originally Posted by RSGuy
I would think that 430whp Dyno-Jet would be possible with the 20G-9 on race gas with the required supporting mods, possible standalone, and good tuning. That would be right around 500hp at the crank. Correct me if I'm wrong, but 500 crank horsepower doesnt seem that out of reach with the 20G-9....
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:46 AM
  #839  
mike1023's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 1
From: NY
well i seen a plenty of stock turbo going 118 117 no bluid motor. and with weight rediction i dont see it having a problem with more, also i think 20g can do 500hp why not lol stock turbo people at 450 right.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:54 AM
  #840  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
u know what, buy one and if u can get 500 hp from it, than i will buy u the biggest cookie i can find.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 AM.