Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Sheet Metal Intake on Staock Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 07:32 PM
  #16  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
i'd rather spend a little bit more money on the AMS intake manifold.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #17  
wilson1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
From: CA
what is the advantage of a sheet metal intake?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 06:15 AM
  #18  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
I can't see any aftermarket intake manifold being of much use with the stock turbocharger. Most SMIM move the peak and overall powerband higher in rpm range. Doing this is at odds with the stock turbo, as it's already out of airflow capacity before you hit the limits of the stock intake.

I would say not to even look at a SMIM unless you have a significantly large turbo that can make serious power in the 8000-9000rpm range. IE, GT35 or larger.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 06:19 AM
  #19  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by wilson1
what is the advantage of a sheet metal intake?
The advantage of a sheet metal intake is that it shifts the power up to an rpm that ususally matches the camshaft and turbo selection. It makes more high rpm power, and sacrifices some low end power.

This is good if you have 280's, GT35, and enough sack to rev/shift at 8500-9000. Up real high rpm, a good SMIM should be worth significant power.

This is bad if you have small-street cams, stock turbo and at 8500rpm the turbo can't even hold 18psi. Then your wasting your time.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 08:26 AM
  #20  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (185)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
in simplest terms, the advantages are what it allows you to do. These manifolds, be they sheet metal, or some other material (Kansai is cast, JUN is stainless for example), have internal volumes much large than stock. The runners also tend to be longer, which increases velocity into the head. Given their larger volume, they also allow for installation of a larger throttle body, which means a larger upper IC pipe, larger endtank, and larger turbo outlet...they all work together.

On the head side, the increased volume and velocity really make the cams sing.

All in all, it is a mod that people tend to do when they have a serious, and I mean serious setup
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #21  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
That is a good point.. I should mention that I have almost everything else upgraded, or will have..

I do personally think an intake manifold upgrade (whether ported or sheet metal) is best for more highly modified cars with upgraded turbos, but they do great with any turbo that can sustain higher boost or air volume... a ported intake manifold, and head, are a good start for a stock turbo though.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #22  
mikiblueeyes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: FAAAR FAAAR AWAAY :)
so what you guys think, results be on build 2.3 stroker taking it t0 8000RPM, with build head and WR turbo. Also 272s cams running with alky at 25-26psi.???
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #23  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by mikiblueeyes
so what you guys think, results be on build 2.3 stroker taking it t0 8000RPM, with build head and WR turbo. Also 272s cams running with alky at 25-26psi.???
you would have far better results saving the $600-$800 on the intake manifold, and combining it with the $1300 of the WR turbo, and buying a larger turbo than the WR.

IMHO a sheet intake and a little WR turbo are a missmatch. The stock intake manifold would likely have a better overall powerband with this small turbo.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #24  
mikiblueeyes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: FAAAR FAAAR AWAAY :)
So basically I will lose power with sheet intake and stockish turbo.??

Starting from What turbo and what boost levels would the manifold make sense?


Thnaks
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:31 AM
  #25  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
The manifold is designed to maximize high rpm power (e.g. 8000-10,000 rpm) at the expense of some low speed efficiency and increased lag. Your factory turbo is not sized for high rpm power. Therefore, what happens is you get some increased lag, and your turbo falls flat on its face in the region where the manifold really starts working. Additionally, your short duration 264 cam set isn't suited for 8-10k rpm even if you had a turbo that could do it, and gears won't resolve that.

The most fundamental strategy in making performance modifications is selecting components that match, and you're talking apples and oranges.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:35 AM
  #26  
DSMotorsport's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: Blairstown, NJ
Originally Posted by Ted B
The manifold is designed to maximize high rpm power (e.g. 8000-10,000 rpm) at the expense of some low speed efficiency and increased lag. Your factory turbo is not sized for high rpm power. Therefore, what happens is you get some increased lag, and your turbo falls flat on its face in the region where the manifold really starts working. Additionally, your short duration 264 cam set isn't suited for 8-10k rpm even if you had a turbo that could do it, and gears won't resolve that.

The most fundamental strategy in making performance modifications is selecting components that match, and you're talking apples and oranges.
Smash that nail! Well said.

100% agreement with Ted, as ususal.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 07:32 AM
  #27  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (185)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, New York
agree as well..I would not bother going through the time and expense of a stroker and a built head only to choke it with a WR. If you are going to go for that sort of setup, which is on the order of a pretty insane motor, strap on a turbo with some cojones and enjoy it
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EvoMoto
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
14
Jan 12, 2006 06:00 PM
EvoMoto
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
65
Nov 17, 2005 12:20 PM
EvoMoto
Evo 'For Sale' Exterior Styling
48
Oct 25, 2005 12:30 PM
EvoMoto
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
10
Sep 26, 2005 01:54 PM
EvoMoto
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
84
Aug 23, 2005 09:54 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:21 AM.