Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

20g-9 vs BB 50trim vs 3037 vs 3076

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 12:03 PM
  #121  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
Are you turning up the fuel pressure? I'm hitting high mid 90% DC at 21-22 psi on a WR turbo with AFRs in the low 11s using a UTEC and 660s. I'm sure I'm easily under 400 whp. And while I'm using a UTEC, I'm currently using MAF-offset fueling, so not using the UTEC standalone fueling feature.
Hi,
The fuel differential pressure stays the same (at ~43psi) as stock. And the 500whp I'm talking about is on race gas, not pump gas. So the extra octane affords a big reduction in BSFC which means more power potential.

Inn-Tune writes...
I have no interest in getting between you two, but what does that have to do with 680cc injectors being enough for ANY setup using a GT30R as you said a few moments ago? They simply will not flow enough to match the air that turbo is capable of moving on the right setup.
I was only referring to EVO applications. Sorry if my post implied otherwise. The most we can comfortably squeeze out of an EVO running a GT3076 is around 500whp on an AWD Dynojet. Maybe 520whp if we really lean on it hard with c16. And even on those applications, IDC stays below 95% with AFRs in the high 11s. The only time we step up to 880cc injectors is in GT35 applications where they have supported 560-580whp. As always, YMMV...

shiv
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #122  
Inn-Tune's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
I was only referring to EVO applications. Sorry if my post implied otherwise. The most we can comfortably squeeze out of an EVO running a GT3076 is around 500whp on an AWD Dynojet. Maybe 520whp if we really lean on it hard with c16. And even on those applications, IDC stays below 95% with AFRs in the high 11s. The only time we step up to 880cc injectors is in GT35 applications where they have supported 560-580whp. As always, YMMV...

shiv
My point stands that with the right setup, on an Evo, you will exceed their capacity. The fact that you haven't run into a car that had the head work etc. to do so doesn't mean it's not possible.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #123  
MDoe8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Denver/STL
Wow I didn't realize it would take that much injector. This turbo will be in my future most likely, but not soon enough (20g). This thread has been extremely informative and I'm sure has helped many in the process. Thank you everyone for lending me some of your knowledge

-Mike
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:43 PM
  #124  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
GT35R's we can't get buy on with a 1,000 cc injector if the car is making good power. Good power to me is 500+ on our dyno.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #125  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
I run 680cc injectors up to 30psi on my old GT3076 setup w/ no issues using the stock ECU. I have now stepped to a bigger turbo and will see how much power these bad boys will support. Those standalones really like the big injectors.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #126  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
GT35R's we can't get buy on with a 1,000 cc injector if the car is making good power. Good power to me is 500+ on our dyno.
Once again, this is because of the injector driver's in your AEM not driving the injector as well as it could. To look at this in perspective, a 1000cc injector is 1.8 times larger than the stock injectors which have been proven to support considerable power: 390whp on Dynojets and 340whp on our Dynos (DD and Mustang). Assuming similar BSFCs, fuel pressures and injector driving characteristics, a 1000cc injector should support over 600whp on our dynos. Considering that we've seen 500whp on 880s with room to spare, I think this is pretty close to the mark.

Regards,
shiv
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #127  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
I'm always amazed on how greedy some stand alones are when it comes to injector sizing.
to be honest, the testing i was referring to was using a stock (chipped) p28 honda ecu with an FJO injector driver box. After we put the drive box on, it actually needed *less* fuel.

this turbo moves some air man, the only way to fuel it is to is a 96lb/hr+ injector . I would barely want to run 880s. Probably not 750s and definately not 680s
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #128  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
The most we can comfortably squeeze out of an EVO running a GT3076 is around 500whp on an AWD Dynojet. Maybe 520whp if we really lean on it hard with c16. And even on those applications, IDC stays below 95% with AFRs in the high 11s. The only time we step up to 880cc injectors is in GT35 applications where they have supported 560-580whp.
Originally Posted by Inn-Tune
My point stands that with the right setup, on an Evo, you will exceed their capacity. The fact that you haven't run into a car that had the head work etc. to do so doesn't mean it's not possible.
if you are running 680cc on 30Rs and 880cc on 35Rs, you must either have some restrictions in the turbo setups or perhaps very high backpressures?

If you get a chance to try one of our kits, you will notice they need far more fuel than this if this is what you are used to. A 1000cc-1200cc is what i like for 35R / 550+ whp and a 880-1000 on a 30R (max out around 580whp). A bigger injector *if tuned properly* will have no downside. I run 1600cc in my 792whp street honda, and i get 24-27mpg.

When you say "really lean on it" what are you doing to get that extra power? Taking fuel out or adding spark advance?

If the car is setup properly and can breathe well, you can run practically no timing, keep the a/f rich and the car will still make a ton of power, and not beat the motor up. If you add spark or lean it out, it wont make any more power, just hurt the motor more.

Last edited by Geoff Raicer; Jan 27, 2006 at 03:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #129  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
if you are running 680s on 30Rs and 880s on 35Rs, you must either have some restrictions in the turbo setups or perhaps very high backpressures?
Or the EVO injector drivers allow them to add more fuel...

I made ~450whp at 28psi w/ AFR of 11.2 w/ 680cc.

Last edited by jj_008; Jan 27, 2006 at 03:11 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #130  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by jj_008
Or the EVO injector drivers allow them to add more fuel...
how does that work? BSFC is BSFC...
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:13 PM
  #131  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
how does that work? BSFC is BSFC...
I think it has to do w/ the opening & closing of the injector (injector driving characteristics). Also, we are comparing different standalones and different cars. 90% duty cycle on one maybe 70% on another.

Last edited by jj_008; Jan 27, 2006 at 03:23 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:13 PM
  #132  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Assuming similar BSFCs, fuel pressures and injector driving characteristics, a 1000cc injector should support over 600whp on our dynos. Considering that we've seen 500whp on 880s with room to spare, I think this is pretty close to the mark.
im not trying to be a pest, so please dont take these posts offensive!! i really think this is a great thread.

one very important factor to consider, is that the efficiency of an IC turbo engine plummets as boost starts to go up. You can definately not assume similar BSFCs at high boost on a big turbo as you can at factory boost, small turbo.

Also, if you are tuning a setup with a high backrpessure exhaust side (poor manifold, poor turbine housing, poor downpipe, restrictive exhaust, etc) it will take less fuel than a setup than can breathe well.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:27 PM
  #133  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
im not trying to be a pest, so please dont take these posts offensive!! i really think this is a great thread.

one very important factor to consider, is that the efficiency of an IC turbo engine plummets as boost starts to go up. You can definately not assume similar BSFCs at high boost on a big turbo as you can at factory boost, small turbo.

Also, if you are tuning a setup with a high backrpessure exhaust side (poor manifold, poor turbine housing, poor downpipe, restrictive exhaust, etc) it will take less fuel than a setup than can breathe well.
For us non-engineer or tuner types, what does BSFC stand for? Thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #134  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by atlvalet
For us non-engineer or tuner types, what does BSFC stand for? Thanks.
Brake Specific Fuel Consumption. Or how much fuel you are using, per horsepower, per hour.

-shiv
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #135  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
Brake specific fuel consumption

Damn, Shiv beat me
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:02 PM.