Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Most WHP on Pump Gas 93/94 Octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 06:39 AM
  #76  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Guys please keep this thread on topic of PUMP GAS #'s Only. If you post race gas, alky,etc.. I will delete them. We want to get real world #'s here. Lets see who has the strongest pump gas car out their.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 06:42 AM
  #77  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000
I wasnt happy with my stock turbo because after 5500 rpm the car lost power and was on the way down in HP
Yeah I remember that dyno. You made like 400whp but everywhere after 5500rpm you had 350whp. Strangest dyno Ive ever seen.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 07:01 AM
  #78  
Eclipsed Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge VA
Originally Posted by Ted B
FWIW, SBR's Dynapak showed 252whp/316 ft lbs for a bone stock '04 EVO VIII. Quite a sizable variance . . .
I think that dyno pak was messed up or maybe not seup right. I only made 329whp and 318tq with TBE,intake,272 cams and a tuned UTEC. On that same dyno I got 275whp and 272tq with a TBE and a tuned UTEC.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #79  
KOEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by dexmix
He should leave it.

I completely agree with what he said, and thats part of why this thread is important to alot of people. There are enough of us with the same concerns, who want to know the potential of these cars on straight pump gas.

We are not here to argue the merits of race gas or meth/alky.
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
Their is nothing wrong with Scorke's Question. It is a Valid one for Members that do not want to run anything but pump gas.
I understand it was a valid thing to say, i'm not fighting anyone on that. All i'm saying, is why even debate over why pump is better then racegas/injection in this thread? It's a waste; this thread is supposed to be strictly about numbers, not on the merits of pump gas.

If you want to read one of those threads, they aren't hard to find, i could pull up 10 "which is better pump, alky, or racegas" threads right now.

All i was saying is lets stay on topic, and lets NOT go down that road ...which is now odviously happening. All it takes is one person to read that post and say "this is stupid, alky injection has safegaurds, and you can run duel maps via SAFC to run racegas" and this whole thread will blow up with "ifs" and "buts" and "_____ is better then pump because...

I was just simply asking if he could please remove that statement, so we didn't have to go over that, AGAIN. But odviously that was a completely insane thing to ask of someone, so just scratch it and continue on.

Back on track, i think it's amazing that so far the stock turbo has produced the biggest TQ numbers and very strong HP numbers, it makes me want to pat on the back for doing it right the first time.

Last edited by KOEvo; Jul 7, 2006 at 07:07 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #80  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
One of the DSM guys got 521/435 on pump on a dynapack with a 2.3/fp3052

http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/memb...ls&userid=5500
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #81  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Well thats sweet, but its on the wrong car.

Scorke

Do I need to specify EVO in my original post, or can everybody assume that from now on?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #82  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by ibanez_926
One of the DSM guys got 521/435 on pump on a dynapack with a 2.3/fp3052

http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/memb...ls&userid=5500

saw his car he pulled out alot for just pump hard to almost belive
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:19 AM
  #83  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Slow boy's dyno read a lil funny, somebody posted that they had a stock 04 evo put down 255/314, so this is not surprising, but it is the wrong car, and helps us none here, so let keep this on topic.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:28 AM
  #84  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
True that i would like to see who's king of the pump
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #85  
Spooldyou's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
little OT, But i wonder why noone has a FP green or red on there car, aside from flanges, whats the major hold up. FP makes great turbos they do wonders on DSMs. wish we had access to these turbos
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #86  
locam's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown, Maryland
bump tp put topic back on top again

caelin~
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #87  
supersupra's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: NW
Evo MR 2005
91 octane
277 HP /272 TQ uncorrected Dynojet 79.37F 20% humidity 19psi
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 04:00 AM
  #88  
locam's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown, Maryland
bump
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #89  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Bump, guys/tuners if your results are higher than the ones on the first page post or pm me.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #90  
ibanez_926's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
wow. I figured since it is still a 4g63 or variation of it, and makes some insane pump gas numbers, you wouldnt get all bothered

My mistake
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:32 AM.