Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Most WHP on Pump Gas 93/94 Octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #46  
evoracer32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
well i have the ams gt3076 turbo kit with aem ems and hks 272 cams and it was on tunning techs dyno
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #47  
locam's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown, Maryland
Edited my post on page one to include the needed data.

caelin~
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #48  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Updated. Thanks guys, this thread should be very useful for newb's and guru's alike.


Scorke
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #49  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Guys can you please all post up your tq numbers, it helps answer the lag questions for lots of people....... tq is good.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #50  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by KOEvo
^ You should remove your middle paragraph there about why you dont like racegas/injection because it is just personal opinion. I see what you're saying, but this thread is going to turn into a why racegas/injection systems aren't bad for your car.


And this is to good of a thread to ruin.
Their is nothing wrong with Scorke's Question. It is a Valid one for Members that do not want to run anything but pump gas.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #51  
evoracer32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
im not sure of my torque off the top of my head and im out of town so i dont have the dyno sheets, but i beleive on pump when i hit 402 whp the torque was right around 377
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #52  
locam's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Randallstown, Maryland
lol, updated first post again. Included tq numbers. Do they seem low?

caelin~
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #53  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
For a GT35R yes, for a T4 GT35R no. I bet your turbo shine's on race gas, but thats not what this thread is about, but lets see......

Scorke


p.s.- tiny cams should help tq but help topend, I dunno what explains it, if you have the sheet post it up, I bet it is just a by product of the laggy hotside.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #54  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
IHI RX6 TCW77L - 400whp/349TQ@5000rpm, 3rd gear, 23psi, SAE corrected on a Dynapak.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #55  
GTREVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: Malaysia
My Evo 6 put down 422 WHP AWD at 22 psi on a Dynojet running a 2.3 stroker engine with a TRust T67-8cm turbo kit and HKS 280 cams hitting full boost of 22 psi at 4100 rpm, am targeting 450 WHP at the same boost on my new GT35R setup
On the very same day, a brand new Evo IX running a Kelford 272 exhaust cam, Autronic SM4 ecu, 700 cc injectors, stock fuel pump putting out 365 WHP on the same Dynojet at 23 psi on a stock TME turbo.

All of the above on 93/94 octane pump gas only.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #56  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Im just saying the numbers as my progress went at that time i had no alk just pump.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #57  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
375 whp 285 tq gruppe-s mustang dyno 91 octane GT35R
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #58  
fromWRXtoEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,087
Likes: 5
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by scorke
Carlos you seem nice, and well intentioned but I am going to have to ask, did you read the first post?

Scorke
You have all the right in the world to call me stupid and dumbass. I am apologizing to you, I did not read the entire topic. My bad.
It is all good now and again sorry for the inconvinience and thanks for being nice when responding me.

I also sent you privately an apology but your PM was full

Carlos

Last edited by fromWRXtoEVO; Jul 6, 2006 at 11:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 04:11 AM
  #59  
scorke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Hehe np man, just trying to keep this thread on track!!!!!!!!!! Bump for more pump gas monstars, I'll update again around noon, and I will do some searching on my own for some impressive numbers with the smaller turbos.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 05:00 AM
  #60  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by trevor
I belive I dyno'd my '04 on the same Dynapack as jj_008 when it was bone stock, and it came out to 225 AWHP, which I thought was pretty accurate. If Dynapacks read high, I don't think they're THAT high. Actually I think they are relatively accurate, but it may be worth comparing #s from a dynapack to a dynojet and so forth.
FWIW, SBR's Dynapak showed 252whp/316 ft lbs for a bone stock '04 EVO VIII. Quite a sizable variance . . .
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:25 AM.