Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Update on TurboTrix HP61 turbo...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #46  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by 2006EBPIX
No I explained the fact that the potential for a faster 1/4 mile exists in the 61 than the 50 trim. It is in the numbers. Peak torque values don't mean squat in the realm of drag racing. Why do you think all the fastest evo shops run 2.0l instead of 2.3l? The LT1 is actually just as good an engine as the LS1. The example was to state my point that in attaining quarter mile times peak torque values don't paint the whole picture. Faster cars are faster because of the torque curve in the powerband not because of a value which is higher a lot of times due to a tuning inefficiency etc.

I think all the fastest drag racing evos are running 2.0's or 2.1's because in order to spool there rediculously oversized turbos they need an assload of rpm's. That guy that made 1041 hp basically spooled for 6.5 thousand rpm then has about 2k rpms where its making insane power, to me, and most people that is far from optimal.

Why do you think the fastest road racing evo's are running 2.3's or 2.4's? To me that is far far more important and usefull for any evo that isnt only going straight.


Silly me, I thought at 30 psi and at full bore down a drag strip that the 50trim would be faster than the 61 Come on, I never said anything like that, all I claimed was that on pump the 50 trim is faster and more fun to drive.

Peak torque values might not mean squat at the dragstrip, but me and lots of other evo owners who know our cars werent made for covering 1320 feet in a straight line, and doing other things (including daily driving) apprecaite and want tq and usable power over all out ***** to the wall top end, otherwise we would of bought a honda and slapped a gt42R on it.....

I agree that peak numbers are not nearly as important as the area under the curves.


Scorke
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #47  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by KOEvo
Scorke, don't forget that the Apex'i RX6 actually holds the record for highest horsepower on pump gas.

And also the stock 16g turbo holds the torque record on pump gas.

Just to clarify...
I know that a 37R or 42R will make more power than anything else on pump gas, but this will be on a 2.1 or 2.0 revving to 9k+, however nobody cares or talks about it because these turbos are slim to no fun on pump gas, and if your shelling out 2k+ for a turbo alone you have the cash to build your motor and run c16 or import whenever you please.

I think your incorrect about your second fact, unless meth injection counts as pump gas for you? I believe your citing sharkbites 512 tq before he jumped up to a 35R?

Scorkes
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #48  
TurboSpoolinIns's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by scorke
I know that a 37R or 42R will make more power than anything else on pump gas, but this will be on a 2.1 or 2.0 revving to 9k+, however nobody cares or talks about it because these turbos are slim to no fun on pump gas, and if your shelling out 2k+ for a turbo alone you have the cash to build your motor and run c16 or import whenever you please.

Scorkes
Not to chime in again, but not true once again. I, and everyone who is actually making bigger power, "care" about these turbos. A 2.3 or 2.4L with a 37R won't be revving to 9k+,more like 8-8500, and it will still be fun as hell on pump gas. I can vouch for that. You can still run "big" turbos on pump gas. Just my .02 and own experience.

C. Lee
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #49  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
The setup that delivers the most average hp through the gears will give the best 1/4 mi performance, it's that simple.

Judging from the graphs above, there should not be a big difference in performance between the two setups (50 trim and 'HP61') as tested. The difference in spool time appears to be the largest difference.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #50  
Guerillah's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Average HP through the powerband used. Any hp below 5000rpm is null in drag racing.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 02:01 AM
  #51  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Come on,Sorke,everyone have thier own prefences,not everyone want a small turbo for turning nor big turbo for drag racing.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 06:38 AM
  #52  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
^ Ang-I completely agree man, but I really really feel that no matter what tricks anybody can pull anything larger than a 35R on pump gas is just kidding themselves if they think its fun on the street, I guess I just don't have that sort of threshhold for lag, but your right, it is a preference not a fact. However I dont even use a "small turbo" I just feel that if I am going to be swapping out my turbo I want my gains everywhere if possible, and to be substantial, I hate to comprimise when it comes to power band......

Spoolins, so come on, why the change of sig when I ask which of your cars has a big turbo on it? Also if your not revving a 37R to 9 grand I'm sure its interesting to drive on the street

Scorke
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #53  
EvoBroMA's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 1
From: MA
Originally Posted by Guerillah
Average HP through the powerband used. Any hp below 5000rpm is null in drag racing.
you can't argue this!
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #54  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
Ok guys, got back from the track this weekend extremely happy

All we have is an 1/8 mile around here so yeah....

But neway

7.32 @ 95.67mph 1.86 60ft

Car spun all through first, and I wailed the rev limiter in 3rd a few times...I'm used to being right at top RPM in 3rd under the lights, but with this setup I'm getting there faster, so I either need to raise my revlimit(still on stock head/bottom so I'm not keen on this) or shift to fourth.

This was my first run of the nite, and I wasn't able to complete another decent run b/c I kept bogging the launch, but still trapping in the mid 90's, lmao.

I know the car has a 7.1 in it...just have to get it now These times should be good for an easy 11.0 or so.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 02:19 AM
  #55  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Originally Posted by ExViTermini
Ok guys, got back from the track this weekend extremely happy

All we have is an 1/8 mile around here so yeah....

But neway

7.32 @ 95.67mph 1.86 60ft

Car spun all through first, and I wailed the rev limiter in 3rd a few times...I'm used to being right at top RPM in 3rd under the lights, but with this setup I'm getting there faster, so I either need to raise my revlimit(still on stock head/bottom so I'm not keen on this) or shift to fourth.

This was my first run of the nite, and I wasn't able to complete another decent run b/c I kept bogging the launch, but still trapping in the mid 90's, lmao.

I know the car has a 7.1 in it...just have to get it now These times should be good for an easy 11.0 or so.
Nice!!You can rev the revlimit tonorth of 8k(Serval Guys Do It) if you want or get some 4.11 gear.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2006 | 05:49 AM
  #56  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by Ang Wen Yan
Nice!!You can rev the revlimit tonorth of 8k(Serval Guys Do It) if you want or get some 4.11 gear.
I figure shes already a ticking time bomb as is, as I do drive it fairly often during the week. I'd rather not take my chances w/out at least some valvesprings. Car is not really a drag car anyway, I just like to have a stupid fast street car
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:03 AM.