The "untuned" log was just my quick-n-dirty tune. It had a bit of knock, so it may have been too aggressive in certain areas. I had Scot Gray do the fine tuning last night (which resulted in the "after" log). He was also the fine-tuner of the IX "before" log. It feels stronger after last night's tuning session, and I feel safer knowing the knock sums are lower (almost none).

Yes, I do have a wideband that I'm logging via ECU+. I can see the data on the graphs, but haven't yet figured out how to export the data to a spreadsheet. The "export" feature in this old version of ECU+ doesn't seem to work. However, the tune I'm running now has low 11's all the way through on AFR.

 

I put up the FPGreen turbo against my stock turbo car. My car only has a TBE and a tune. That is it. I used the same temps, humidity, pressure, and weight in both runs. My car makes a bit more torque and the same hp down low, but loses power and torque up top.

IMO, I think this car should make more power given the mods that it has.

 

Not to get O/T... but those are decent numbers there nj1266.

 

nj1266, yeah, im just not seeing the $1700 power here..

 

Thanks for your valuable input.

 

is your stock turbo an 05 VIII turbo?

 

Yes it is. The car's only power mechnical mod is the TBE. I have a JDM DV aside from that. I am a big fan of the stock turbo. The only turbo I might swap to is the Evo IX turbo.

 

I noticed that too. My TBE car loads up to 245-250 @ peak boost torque. Maybe that is what is keeping the car from achieving its power potential.

 

that's what i was thinking. a stock IX turbo brand new is less than half the cost of the evogreen, even a 20g-9 is half the price. i'd like to see a comparison between the evogreen and stock IX turbo on a car with just minor stuff like exhaust or an air filter on pump.

 

You mean $1970 for a bolt on turbo??? You might as well put $1000.00 on that and get a full blown turbo kit.

 

just a note i have had my magnacore wires for over a year and a half now and never once had any issues, by the way they were purchased from BR

 

Thanks...Here's my best one. Peak is lower, but the overall curve is better. Notice how the car holds hp up top. I love the stock turbo I am tempted to get 272 cams and tune the car to see what I can get.

 

He probably has larger injectors, which is why his calc load is low. My car logs about 220 or so but I hit over 260 load column. I've been too lazy to change the XML.

 

He's got Blitz (Denso) 660's

 

Yes, I do have Denso 660cc injectors.

After some additional tweaks on the tune, I'll post up another pull for analysis.