Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Mangus Intake Manifold, Good or Not??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 12:55 AM
  #31  
Rcebowl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally Posted by Frenchy4g63
Im not saying the Magnus manifold isn't top quality, it most certainly is. I based my comment about AMS being the best because most of the fastest Evo's have switched from the Magnus to AMS. (DynoFlash, Buschur etc.) and have stated the AMS piece is the best out there. Now I will admit that I dont have flow numbers or back to back dyno pulls to back up this statement, but I feel their word should be good enough.

(edit)
The Magnus intake you linked looks promising it seems some of the newer designs as well as the higher price ones (HKS, Jun etc) seem to have the TB angled as the air enters the plenum. Does anyone know what advantage this would serve?

On another note, the Full Race mani (which also has the angled TB) looks VERY nice, and from the pictures I've seen the TB looks to be a spectacular design. It will be very interesting to see how it compares to Magnus or AMS here shortly.

ACTUALLY dynoflash did another change soon after using the AMS intake manifold .... if memory services me correctly ... Al currently uses the HKS intake manifold with a Q45 TB (last time he gave out a list of mods ... that's the intake manifold he was using)


but yes ... he did go from Magnus to AMS to HKS
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 01:10 AM
  #32  
funnyclub's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
Originally Posted by EvOcHaRgeR
Yeah its been released! Its like 1200 bucks and looks similar to the JUN unit. I don't remember which thread it was in but it has the pics.
Are u sure mate? As I have done a search and nothing has come up.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #33  
Rcebowl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
here you go bro... it's like the 2nd or 3rd page

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...6&page=1&pp=15
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #34  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Rcebowl
ACTUALLY dynoflash did another change soon after using the AMS intake manifold .... if memory services me correctly ... Al currently uses the HKS intake manifold with a Q45 TB (last time he gave out a list of mods ... that's the intake manifold he was using)


but yes ... he did go from Magnus to AMS to HKS

Well, thanks for clearing that up.. last I had heard that was what he was using. Makes sense though, he seems to change parts pretty often.

I wonder how long it will be before he's using the Full Race piece.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #35  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Rcebowl
here you go bro... it's like the 2nd or 3rd page

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...6&page=1&pp=15

That is one perty intake mani. Looks like a really well enginered piece. And the TB should be well ahead of the accufab etc. ones.

It is pricey but does include IIRC; the manifold, fuel rail, TB, and hardware. so all in all not too bad.

SO.. does anyone know why a lot of the newer designs (FR, JUN, HKS), have the TB angled where it meets the plenum?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
03BoostedVIII
Site Feedback / Suggestions
6
Sep 18, 2011 09:49 AM
bouncintiga
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Nov 18, 2009 12:14 PM
zboy's_lancer
04-06 Ralliart General
17
Jun 24, 2007 12:24 PM
yesevo
Evo General
15
Sep 4, 2005 06:24 AM
ozracer4
Lancer General
8
May 17, 2004 06:41 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 AM.