No also cools the intake charge signifigantly. It cools the air a TON which makes a lot more power because the denser the air the more air, also when turboing which makes the air pretty damn hot the help is even more of an increase.

To me alky and 24 psi is an injustice, alky and 25-30 psi makes sense.

Scorke

 

o so its cooling the air more after the intercooler, it is going in the system post intercooler correct? yea i guess thats a good idea, cooler denser air = more air into the cylinders = more power, but yea i still dont get the 24 psi thing.

 

I don't mean to come across as a hater, but I'm gonna have to call shenanigans on that graph.

I'd be pretty skeptical of those dyno number based on the fact that we are looking at an uncorrected dyno pull in February in Connecticut. Corrected numbers will most likely be lower. I just had my car dynoed at AMS - 70 degrees ambient temps - and uncorrected numbers would add more than 5 whp to my chart as opposed to SAE corrected. I'd also be skeptical of any number coming off of Pruven's dyno ... one of the most inflated AWD dynos in the country. If I was you, I'd get it dynoed somewhere else just to validate...

l8r)

 

in fact that day was not as cold as u would think. it was about 45 out and sunny. as for being the most inflated in the country, how the hell do u know? what about "the shop" mustang dyno? thats showing higher numbers than Pruvens dnojet. hosestly i think u just want to hate on me and Pruven. because as i have said b4, Dan the owner, has takin his car to a local dyno, paid to get it dynoed in the same conditions, same day as he dynoed his car. the results were within 5whp.

also u do realize that a dynojets numbers are what they are. they can not be altered like mustangs and DD's. think about it

 

Not hating on you personally, just skeptical of the circumstances surrounding that graph, that's all. In the end as long as you're happy with your car that's all that matters.

l8r)

 

45 Out will make much better numbers than 70 or above for sure. I didn't want to say what you did ludi but your right, that dyno has always read high...

Scorke

 

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=178448

Anybody else made 480 wtq on the stock turbo?

Scorke

 

and look at the stock numbers, hum looks like 259 whp and 260 tq. so as u can see the dyno is right on as for stock numbers for a mivec headed evo. so i really dont know what else to say here fellas.

 

o thats sharkebites old setup. the last dynosheet he made, (i was there for) was like 700whp and like 550tq with a fully built, modded to the gils 37r. so i dont think thats crazy numbers for a 37r on 40 psi.

put everything into perspective.

 

Nothing to say DB. The numbers are what they are and really aren't an issue.

Now, let's see if we can get back ON TOPIC. What happend with the OP's car? Have I missed it in all the side tracks?

I had actually planned on doing a 50 Trim 3076 comparison, but just don't have time and recently put on a 35R. I had the 3076 and was very happy with it. I was going to switch it out for the 50 Trim, but got a great deal on a 35R.

 

700 450, yeah that would be more realistic than 700 650, which is ridiculous https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ight=sharkbite .

Scorke

 

You would be able to advance timing a butt-load without detonation

 

ok 700 600, thats not unrealistic.

ps im done, 400whp is a ok with me and i love my ATP 3037s

 

We will see what my car puts down at AMS dyno and then we will really see whats up.

 

Agreed, I think AMS will coax more power out of it however as these crazy setups are there bread and butter, make sure you not baseline and after.

Scorke