WOT porting?
WOT porting?
Im just trying to figure this out because its bothering me, I hear alot of ppl talking about WOT porting and I cant find out what this is. Im guessing its a shop but i cant find any info.
Thanks, Doug
Thanks, Doug
Trending Topics
Man, his username on EvoM is, "WOT". Normally, the porting job on the Green from FP only involves gasket matching the turbine housing inlet to the exhaust manifold flange. I'd guess that WOT's porting job is more involved and complete and reduces backpressure within the 10.5 housing itself. You can PM him though.
Man, his username on EvoM is, "WOT". Normally, the porting job on the Green from FP only involves gasket matching the turbine housing inlet to the exhaust manifold flange. I'd guess that WOT's porting job is more involved and complete and reduces backpressure within the 10.5 housing itself. You can PM him though.
WOT
First off, i am not a vendor. i just modify stuff for my friends within the evo community.
I dont have a dyno compare of my 65mm tb's vs others, but check out my 65mm tb vs. oem tb dyno compare within my signature that was conducted on the same day, same car, same mbc setting, same fuel, same cal, etc.
the car never got pulled off the dyno & this was performed in front of ~20 socal evo members. the inlet manifold was ported prior to both dyno runs, in order to support the 65mm tb
This is the ONLY dyno compare that i have seen comparing oem vs. 65mm tb's.
it's not gospel, but it is a dyno compare that was paid for by me.
I dont have a dyno compare of my 65mm tb's vs others, but check out my 65mm tb vs. oem tb dyno compare within my signature that was conducted on the same day, same car, same mbc setting, same fuel, same cal, etc.
the car never got pulled off the dyno & this was performed in front of ~20 socal evo members. the inlet manifold was ported prior to both dyno runs, in order to support the 65mm tb
This is the ONLY dyno compare that i have seen comparing oem vs. 65mm tb's.
it's not gospel, but it is a dyno compare that was paid for by me.
WOT, looking at the dyno comparo of the two TBs in your sig, it looks like both runs are within the noise of the dyno, and that the peak hp "gain" is just a spike in the noise. They look like the normal run to run variation you'd see even if no mods were made between runs... its seems misleading to quote a 8.3 hp gain on a spike...
WOT, looking at the dyno comparo of the two TBs in your sig, it looks like both runs are within the noise of the dyno, and that the peak hp "gain" is just a spike in the noise. They look like the normal run to run variation you'd see even if no mods were made between runs... its seems misleading to quote a 8.3 hp gain on a spike...
however the 3 runs made with the oem were within 1.8 whp of each other & the 3 pulls with 65mm tb run were within 2 whp of each other. so for the most part, the dyno was reading fairly consistant alonfg with the tune. power did not degrade from run to run due to an overly aggressive/ambitious tune.
the 2 runs from each config were the highest peak value. the 8.3 does in fact come from the peak numeber, but clearly there is a 5whp gain made about 90% across the entire power curve.
hence the statement of:
"My 65mm tb vs oem tb dyno comapre illustrating a avg. of 5whp gain / max 8.3 whp gain over oem"
it's funny how someone who is willing to disect the finer points of a dyno chart is capable of missing the bold print describing the dyno chart
ron- all 3 runs with the 65mm tb were higher than the best oem run.
The higher reading values on the dyno graph posted were experienced with the 65mm tb, not the other way around. Not just the 8.3 whp gspike that your refering to or implying was the only gain. i can email you or anyone else a copy of the scan if you want, so you can view it closer. just pm me your emial address
since your a stickler for detail, please tell me the differnce's you see in the other vendors 65mm tb whp claim from their dyno compare........oh wait, there arent any
Last edited by Aby@MIL.SPEC; Jun 30, 2007 at 04:12 PM.



