675whp 500ft lbs. TQ!!!!
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (28)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, Chicago - Washington DC
no pics/vids except whats on my gf phone... i will try to take some this weekend and maybe even take the car out for a spin if this weather goes above 0 deg!!!!
he still has a band, and can rev to 11k.
hell hes making 400 @ 5k. and his band should be 7-10.
what the hell else does he need? If he was on a 2.3 like me and only revving to 8800 i would say YES he needs the ball bearing. But he doesn't. However i feel that ball bearing turbos are superior in other ways and shine at higher boost beacause of less heat.
hell hes making 400 @ 5k. and his band should be 7-10.
what the hell else does he need? If he was on a 2.3 like me and only revving to 8800 i would say YES he needs the ball bearing. But he doesn't. However i feel that ball bearing turbos are superior in other ways and shine at higher boost beacause of less heat.
he still has a band, and can rev to 11k.
hell hes making 400 @ 5k. and his band should be 7-10.
what the hell else does he need? If he was on a 2.3 like me and only revving to 8800 i would say YES he needs the ball bearing. But he doesn't. However i feel that ball bearing turbos are superior in other ways and shine at higher boost beacause of less heat.
hell hes making 400 @ 5k. and his band should be 7-10.
what the hell else does he need? If he was on a 2.3 like me and only revving to 8800 i would say YES he needs the ball bearing. But he doesn't. However i feel that ball bearing turbos are superior in other ways and shine at higher boost beacause of less heat.


