Buschur Racing tests the new HTA3076
Newbie
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
Matt we all know u love the 35R talk is cheap...go buy it.
diffrent stroke's for diffrent stroke' s my brotha..who care's abouth the 35R! were talking about the 30R .Of course it makes more power than a 30R is that ya point? it's a FACT already.i personally are going to have the HTA35R nest summer but only with a built bottom end.BUT my car is far from a slouch. u sit here and bash it everywhere u post ...lol meanwhile your on a stock turbo..
diffrent stroke's for diffrent stroke' s my brotha..who care's abouth the 35R! were talking about the 30R .Of course it makes more power than a 30R is that ya point? it's a FACT already.i personally are going to have the HTA35R nest summer but only with a built bottom end.BUT my car is far from a slouch. u sit here and bash it everywhere u post ...lol meanwhile your on a stock turbo..
disclaimer: did not have time to read every page of this thread...
Judging by the 30+psi HTA 3076 vs HTA 35 dynograph (both with .82's) -- the HTA 3076 spooled maybe 200rpm sooner and made 100whp less than the HTA 35 -- so, why are we all celebrating again?
we're talking about 200rpm here, people...
Judging by the 30+psi HTA 3076 vs HTA 35 dynograph (both with .82's) -- the HTA 3076 spooled maybe 200rpm sooner and made 100whp less than the HTA 35 -- so, why are we all celebrating again?
we're talking about 200rpm here, people...
+1...I agree 100% with you NYC drifter........No **** the 35r crushes the 30r. It flows more. Like NYC drifter said said this is about the 30r. My car is no slouch either. I love my 30r. I want a 35r but like he said ill feel better with a built block. An HTA35r that is pushed would kill a stock block
Account Disabled
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: NY
IMO not the best setup with the stock block with all these stock appearing turbos lately...IMO the hta30r is in the past
I agree it is not the best. I feel it is one of the best routes to go. If you could throw on a red or an hta30r turbo kit and pay the same price lets say around 2000 bucks I wonder what everyone would go with.
I, too, have been on the stock-framed turbo train/wagon since the FP Red came on the scene. I've seen the FP Red on E85 set at 30PSI put out around 490-525whp. This is/was with all the fixings. On pump, typically around 430-460whp or so. What I would like to see (and I'll search throughout previous threads) is how the FP Red stacks up on pump to the HTA3076r (equipped with the .63 housing) on pump with similar set ups. I just don't want to be that guy with a garage full of stock-frame parts sitting around that wouldn't be the case if I stepped up to the HTA3076 in the first place. I'm a fan of the HTA3076 but nowadays you have to really look at all of the details considering the EVO turbo variations out there. I have an E85 station less than three miles from my house so I'm seriously considering this as part of the equation. I've read about an EVO running the FP3065 equipped with 1600cc injectors, single fuel pump, set at 22PSI that ran a 10.95 @ 130MPH. I'll venture to guess that a set of 1250cc injectors on the HTA3076 set at low boost (21-24PSI) with one fuel pump on E85 would be quite fun. This leaves quite a bit left on the table if/when the time to step up comes around.
To go off topic to get a question answered...
What are the differences in spool (roughly) between the following turbos?
a) 3076
b) 3076r
c) HTA3076
d) 3065
e) 3065r
I'm interested in running one of these turbo kits with the .63 turbine housing. I use my car on the track/street and other than adding springs/retainers and rods, I'm not looking at doing very much else to the 2.0L stock bottom end. I'd be happy with 490-515whp with as much low-to-mid range grunt as possible.
Thanks fellahs.
To go off topic to get a question answered...
What are the differences in spool (roughly) between the following turbos?
a) 3076
b) 3076r
c) HTA3076
d) 3065
e) 3065r
I'm interested in running one of these turbo kits with the .63 turbine housing. I use my car on the track/street and other than adding springs/retainers and rods, I'm not looking at doing very much else to the 2.0L stock bottom end. I'd be happy with 490-515whp with as much low-to-mid range grunt as possible.
Thanks fellahs.
On the contrary, 30's still have their place in the world. But to your list, the BBK Full has proven to outdo the Green time and time again. At any rate, my intentions are to hopefully bridge the gap between the FP Red and HTA3076 by going with the .63 housing with the potential of upgrading down the line easier as opposed to having a garage full of parts for sale at a discounted price.
On the contrary, 30's still have their place in the world. But to your list, the BBK Full has proven to outdo the Green time and time again. At any rate, my intentions are to hopefully bridge the gap between the FP Red and HTA3076 by going with the .63 housing with the potential of upgrading down the line easier as opposed to having a garage full of parts for sale at a discounted price.
Account Disabled
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: NY
On the contrary, 30's still have their place in the world. But to your list, the BBK Full has proven to outdo the Green time and time again. At any rate, my intentions are to hopefully bridge the gap between the FP Red and HTA3076 by going with the .63 housing with the potential of upgrading down the line easier as opposed to having a garage full of parts for sale at a discounted price.
the BBK does better than the green because basically was designed from the green. It seems like a bigger better fp Green.
You are splitting hairs at this point. Having the red gives you 30R type power but a massive torque curve by retaining the OEM twin scroll design that no single scroll 30R can match, not even close. After the Red the only real choice is a 35R, go for the lag and BIG power. I doubt any turbo could compete with the Red in terms of power band, price, driveability.