Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Mustang Dyno comparison.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #136  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by Evoryder
Buschur you did contradict yourself...you said you didn't log the car and now you said you didn't see that much knock?

Nick, I believe clearing the codes does reset the ecu. Just like disconnecting the battery or removing the ecu fuse.
It does not. The only way to reset the fuel trims is to remove power from the ECU using the fuse or battery terminal.

Originally Posted by 9sec9
OK, now I've got to learn something. Are you saying that by clearing the LTFT's, the performance at WOT changes? I've always been with the understanding that WOT is 'you get what you want, but you may not like it'. Does clearing the stock ecu codes (other than obvious equip failure, etc) have any effect on WOT operations?
Fuel trims are global.

Last edited by Mr. Evo IX; May 16, 2008 at 12:32 PM.
Old May 16, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #137  
bolio's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: san antonio
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Just from sitting back reading all this regarding these 2 Mustang Dynos and the pump gas wars, I definitley think Buschurs reads lower no doubt. I do believe that DTMs dyno does read like a normal Mustang dyno though, I just think Buschurs reads the lowest of any Mustang dyno. With that said, I am sure that the car that made 600+ on DTM's dyno would be around in line ~550-570 on Buschur's dyno. The only real way to end this would to have a 550+ BUschur cars or DTM's 600+ car go to each others dyno, one or the other.
The MZM Mustang dyno in Austin reads like Buschurs I believe. It takes around 290-300whp to run 11's on a full weight evo 8-9.
Old May 16, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #138  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Mr. Evo IX
Fuel trims are global.
Thanks Mr. Evo IX, I guess since the battery get's disconnected so often as well as trims being kept in check, I've been lucky enough to not have an issue. I appreciate the response.
Old May 16, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #139  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
Ok. So the battery reset and fuse removal is the only complete way for a ecu reset. Good info.
Old May 16, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #140  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
battery reset OR fuse removal actually. Fuse removal being the quickest and easiest and you dont lose your radio stations or clock.
Old May 16, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #141  
dsycks's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
From: Logan Ohio, USA
This has really just taken on a bit of a life of it's own.
Old May 16, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #142  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
Originally Posted by Mr. Evo IX
battery reset OR fuse removal actually. Fuse removal being the quickest and easiest and you dont lose your radio stations or clock.
thats what i meant. either or...

yes this thread has made quite a few turns ...
Old May 16, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #143  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
So let me get this straight. If you have an exhaust leak before the front 02 sensor, that is setting a lean code, it will trim the fuels richer even at WOT? I just want to be clear on this. I'd like an answer from someone at DTM, please.
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #144  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Shearer
Norwalk is an NHRA track.

Screw dyno numbers, they are a point of reference and the machine itself is a tuning tool. Only three numbers matter in the grand scheme of things; vehicle weight, ET, and MPH. For those of you claiming big numbers then get your asses to the track to back up your mouth and dyno numbers.

Sorry for that rant, just got off the phone with some idiot who wouldn't shut up about how great his dyno queen is. Bla bla bla.
I was reading this thread thinking to myself there is no way I can read this to the end of the thread this is such nonsense

Anyway, thanks for the perspective to give me a book end and escape with my mind intact

Some of us make it a point to back up our claims with real world results. I have managed to take time from my busy schedule to get my fat *** to the track and run 9's every year for the last 4 years - thanks to Shearer for a great manifold which stands the test of time. Talk is cheap, actions speak louder thyan words.

Buschur has many 10 second Evos on pump gas with ample verification and proof to back up his claims - end of story.

Al
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #145  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
So let me get this straight. If you have an exhaust leak before the front 02 sensor, that is setting a lean code, it will trim the fuels richer even at WOT? I just want to be clear on this. I'd like an answer from someone at DTM, please.

DAVID - would you be willing to accept my offer to repair the man's 02 housing gasket (at my expense) ? I would like to see the car re-dyoned with the gasket leak repaired (just for my amusment)

I would be happy to pay for Master Dan's time to fix the problem and then we can see what effect the leak has on ultimate power.

Also we can log the pre and post repair LT fuel trims and a/f under WOT to see what kind of effect this situation has on the car's performance.

Every theory needs to be tested.

Al
Old May 17, 2008 | 02:21 AM
  #146  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
For DTM being a "little guy" shop, the "big guys" sure seem hell-bent on discrediting them.
Old May 17, 2008 | 02:55 AM
  #147  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
I am not going to read more than the first page and a half here, but it is clear that the car is knocking on the current tune based on the large drop in torque on BR's sheet.

Unless there is a considerable load difference in David's AWD500, the readings should be similar if the same heat range plugs were used of same manufacturer as when the DTM dyno was run.

About the whole MD vs Dynojet debate, it is my professional opinion that periodically these MD tested cars should be run on a Dynojet 424x and a "Dynojet Mode" calibration should be programmed on the MD to replicate one run in a DJ Mode.

I would calibrate this mode for a number of cars 50whp apart from one another, i.e.- 400whp, 450whp, 500whp, 550whp actual Dynojet and the cal file for this Dynojet mode modified until this mode matches the HP numbers from the VERIFIED 424x readings.

This is for when it comes down to the whole "whats the correction factor for DJ?" line of questioning, there will be a mode to make one run for ****s and giggles to see what it puts down in this "test mode". So in essence the car would have two sets of figures. One true MD factory calibrated set of actual figures and one mimic test mode, Dynojet replicated and verified by means of an -as tested set of Evo's on the Dynojet 424x with known set of numbers.
Old May 17, 2008 | 06:00 AM
  #148  
fishdude's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Reston/Knoxville
Anyone posting anything else needs to read this first.


https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=345946
Old May 17, 2008 | 06:29 AM
  #149  
version 2 beta's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: JAPAN
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
For DTM being a "little guy" shop, the "big guys" sure seem hell-bent on discrediting them.
They have good reason for trying though... (I won't say it as I got banned for it earlier )

This seems to be a Magnus situation all over again.

I guess DTM now has a proper welcome to EvolutionM.net
Old May 17, 2008 | 07:46 AM
  #150  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
So let me get this straight. If you have an exhaust leak before the front 02 sensor, that is setting a lean code, it will trim the fuels richer even at WOT? I just want to be clear on this. I'd like an answer from someone at DTM, please.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
DAVID - would you be willing to accept my offer to repair the man's 02 housing gasket (at my expense) ? I would like to see the car re-dyoned with the gasket leak repaired (just for my amusment)

I would be happy to pay for Master Dan's time to fix the problem and then we can see what effect the leak has on ultimate power.

Also we can log the pre and post repair LT fuel trims and a/f under WOT to see what kind of effect this situation has on the car's performance.

Every theory needs to be tested.

Al
Im sure the two of you could do just fine trying to figure it out. After all the mastery and deception that this magic duo is good for, I'm sure you will be able to disprove gravity as well. Let us know how you make out.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 AM.