FP Green
well the previous owner had dynoed the car before with the same mods on a dynojet and the car put 325AWHP. I figured with the mods I have that it would put me right around 300 AWHP. The guy above just said he got his stock evo 9 dynoed at the same place and he put down 245whp. My car has a tune from AL at dynoflash also so its not just intake and exhaust along with a greddy Boost controller set at 23psi.
South Florida, it was probably on TTP's dyno, which has proven itself here over and over to yield dynojet-like numbers. So, yes, he probably DID make those numbers, and they were probably also corrected. 425 on their dyno is like 375 on most other mustangs in the country.
Don't believe everything you read or hear, and carry a large shovel to get through the BS.
side note: NO knock on TTP, they put out good stuff! Ask the guy what a STOCK evo puts down on that exact dyno.
Don't believe everything you read or hear, and carry a large shovel to get through the BS.
side note: NO knock on TTP, they put out good stuff! Ask the guy what a STOCK evo puts down on that exact dyno.
im so sick & tired of people quoting dyno numbers as absolute.
Dyno numbers are relative numbers to show gains specifically to your car & environment, not as a general number that can be compared to all vehicles in the world.
Dyno your car stock, then dyno it again after you have modded it to see what those mods did.. that is what a dyno is for, to show your own progression as its relative to you & only your car.
Mustang, dynojet.. whatever.... its all relative & can be manipulated.
Dyno numbers are relative numbers to show gains specifically to your car & environment, not as a general number that can be compared to all vehicles in the world.
Dyno your car stock, then dyno it again after you have modded it to see what those mods did.. that is what a dyno is for, to show your own progression as its relative to you & only your car.
Mustang, dynojet.. whatever.... its all relative & can be manipulated.
Yes it's possible. This is what I did last week. FP Green, Sunoco 93

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362655

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362655
Last edited by SLVRNBLK; Aug 12, 2008 at 03:09 PM.
The Japtrix dyno reads a little high. I made 385 hp there on 93, then went too see Mike at AWD Motorsports 2 weeks later and made 399 hp 2nd pull. Mike has a dynojet, nicely done too. ...but it easy to change the settings...
I suppose they could have made 425, but something doesn't sound right.
I suppose they could have made 425, but something doesn't sound right.
Yes it's possible. This is what I did last week. FP Green, Sunoco 93

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362655

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362655
The OP is asking if a car with a stock bottom end, stock cams and stock head would put down 425 on a Mustang Dyno. Obviously, that isn't going to happen given the mods of said car.
Built bottom end means nothing powerwise, and again, that's on TTP's dyno which has been proven to read high, end of discussion. There's nothing "wrong" with any of these numbers! You just NEED to put them into PERSPECTIVE.
End the benchracing sillyness.
ps--silvrnblk, damn your car is clean, saw pics in another thread
End the benchracing sillyness.
ps--silvrnblk, damn your car is clean, saw pics in another thread




(on a standard low reading mustang). 270whp is more likely.




