Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FP Green

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #16  
JdmSyndicate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
well the previous owner had dynoed the car before with the same mods on a dynojet and the car put 325AWHP. I figured with the mods I have that it would put me right around 300 AWHP. The guy above just said he got his stock evo 9 dynoed at the same place and he put down 245whp. My car has a tune from AL at dynoflash also so its not just intake and exhaust along with a greddy Boost controller set at 23psi.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #17  
ken9gsr's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach FL
you should ask him if they ever took it to the track and how much did it trap.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #18  
black_evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by scheides
South Florida, it was probably on TTP's dyno, which has proven itself here over and over to yield dynojet-like numbers. So, yes, he probably DID make those numbers, and they were probably also corrected. 425 on their dyno is like 375 on most other mustangs in the country.

Don't believe everything you read or hear, and carry a large shovel to get through the BS.

side note: NO knock on TTP, they put out good stuff! Ask the guy what a STOCK evo puts down on that exact dyno.
Really? Hmmm.....I can care less about dyno numbers, but where's the proof?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #19  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Search around, stock IX turbos don't usually make over 400whp on a mustang dyno.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #20  
ROGERV's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by scheides
Then their mustang reads high as well, you have 300whp@23psi listed in your sig, but no cams. Not super likely on a VIII w/o cams (on a standard low reading mustang). 270whp is more likely.
+1
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #21  
JdmSyndicate's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Well I don't know if there dyno reads high, because I saw a brand new evo X get dynoed at the same shop with only a catback and intake and the car put down 257AWHP.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #22  
SixOneNine's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Chula Vista, CA
Originally Posted by nils
im so sick & tired of people quoting dyno numbers as absolute.

Dyno numbers are relative numbers to show gains specifically to your car & environment, not as a general number that can be compared to all vehicles in the world.

Dyno your car stock, then dyno it again after you have modded it to see what those mods did.. that is what a dyno is for, to show your own progression as its relative to you & only your car.

Mustang, dynojet.. whatever.... its all relative & can be manipulated.
Couldn't have said it any better. Evom is just so caught up on the number game.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #23  
SLVRNBLK's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: ArmyFCOTM Winner
iTrader: (169)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 51
From: Tampa, FL
Yes it's possible. This is what I did last week. FP Green, Sunoco 93

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362655

Last edited by SLVRNBLK; Aug 12, 2008 at 03:09 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #24  
IguessNot's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: orange county, ca
you should go back to this guy and show him this thread...lol
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #25  
black_evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by scheides
Search around, stock IX turbos don't usually make over 400whp on a mustang dyno.
Does not "prove" anything.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 02:34 PM
  #26  
SWOLN's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 13
From: In the Florida Swamps
The Japtrix dyno reads a little high. I made 385 hp there on 93, then went too see Mike at AWD Motorsports 2 weeks later and made 399 hp 2nd pull. Mike has a dynojet, nicely done too. ...but it easy to change the settings...

I suppose they could have made 425, but something doesn't sound right.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 05:05 AM
  #27  
TeStUdO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 41
From: Secret Tweaker Pad
Originally Posted by SLVRNBLK
Yes it's possible. This is what I did last week. FP Green, Sunoco 93

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362655
That is on a built bottom end and stage 3 head.

The OP is asking if a car with a stock bottom end, stock cams and stock head would put down 425 on a Mustang Dyno. Obviously, that isn't going to happen given the mods of said car.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 06:31 AM
  #28  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Built bottom end means nothing powerwise, and again, that's on TTP's dyno which has been proven to read high, end of discussion. There's nothing "wrong" with any of these numbers! You just NEED to put them into PERSPECTIVE.

End the benchracing sillyness.

ps--silvrnblk, damn your car is clean, saw pics in another thread
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #29  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by scheides
Built bottom end means nothing powerwise...

^This is a too broad, generality.^
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #30  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by sparky
^This is a too broad, generality.^
Sparky, I think he meant that your car will never make power with whatever bottom end you put on there. Just kidding, of course

Now, lets compare DLL graphs and arm wrestle to prove who's right
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 PM.