My 4G64 block after machine work PICS

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 7, 2010 | 01:06 PM

#106

lp_ceo

Evolving Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts: 125

Likes: 0

From: Brooklyn NYC

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeanC

I doubt I'll have a problem that I can't solve...ATI dampers are pretty simple. They have different o-rings you can use for different applications. In some cases it may require some tuning for your engine. Also, it's important that the hub for the ATI damper is press fit correctly (about .0009" is ok). I doubt many people who installed the ATI damper actually checked the hub ID and crank snout OD to verify there was the proper press fit. Furthermore, if it was not quite right...how many people do you think actually had the crank pulley honed to the correct size?I'm using a proper dial bore gauge to measure the crank pulley and nice micrometer to check the snout. I'll post my results.

I'll be using a 4G64 DOHC belt.

who are ? are you the brains behind mitsubishi... lol ... damn you know your stuff... subscribed

Jul 7, 2010 | 01:08 PM

#107

n2oiroc

Evolved Member

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 3,180

Likes: 5

From: milwaukee, wi

if that thing is 1.5mm over the pistons, throw it out.

Last edited by n2oiroc; Jul 7, 2010 at 05:09 PM.

Jul 7, 2010 | 03:16 PM

#108

wcevo8tech

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 9

Likes: 0

From: walnut

well, i could read SI swimsuit issue thought it! IF the machine shop would have done HIS homework this wouldnt have happened.

there is a bunch of drama behind the owner and the shop that closed, im just trying to make it run under its own power and see what happens.

Jul 7, 2010 | 05:11 PM

#109

n2oiroc

Evolved Member

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 3,180

Likes: 5

From: milwaukee, wi

Quote:

Originally Posted by wcevo8tech

there is no way it will run, dont ruin the pistons and rings in it and waste the gasket money. .006" piston to wall is huge. .060" is beyond what would ever make it out the door without sucking the oil pan dry.

Jul 7, 2010 | 05:37 PM

#110

wcevo8tech

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 9

Likes: 0

From: walnut

Quote:

Originally Posted by n2oiroc

the wall thinkness im sure is thin, but the bore clearance is .0035, so were good there.

Jul 7, 2010 | 07:04 PM

#111

evo-kro

Newbie

iTrader: (2)

Joined: May 2009

Posts: 51

Likes: 0

From: wisconsin rapids

over my head but it looks great, wish i was a baller.

Jul 7, 2010 | 07:55 PM

#112

n2oiroc

Evolved Member

iTrader: (33)

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 3,180

Likes: 5

From: milwaukee, wi

Quote:

Originally Posted by wcevo8tech

the wall thinkness im sure is thin, but the bore clearance is .0035, so were good there.

oh! it sounded like you had 87mm pistons ordered and the block was 88.5mm. you had me worried.

Jul 7, 2010 | 09:10 PM

#113

wcevo8tech

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 9

Likes: 0

From: walnut

Quote:

Originally Posted by n2oiroc

oh! it sounded like you had 87mm pistons ordered and the block was 88.5mm. you had me worried.

Yeah, i had CP custom make these, saddly no body along the way ever cracked open a book to see what the proper bore size should have been. Believe me id rather have had to look for a 2.0 block than to do this BS again.

thanks to all that have givin imput, you Evo guys are cool!

May 7, 2013 | 09:54 AM

#114

anwkid

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2013

Posts: 19

Likes: 0

From: visalia

How did you get those prices from lesco? I was just there getting prices for the exact same machining and they wanted nearly $2800 for an assembled short block. That's just machining and assembly! I've bought all the parts already!